no, there isn't.
At least 10 players better than Laver's career in the open era :
1. Federer
2. Sampras
3. Borg
4. Nadal
5. Djokovic
6. Mcenroe
7. Lendl
8. Connors
9. Agassi
10. Becker
11. Edberg
12. Wilander
abmk,
I won't disagree or agree with you but I will point out a few facts about Laver in the Open Era. Obviously Laver won the Open Grand Slam which I think should count for extra credit. He won five classic Open Majors but here's the thing, the system wasn't what it was now. The 1970 Dunlop was essentially the Australian for that year and Laver won it. Laver won the 1970 and 1971 Tennis Champions Classic, the latter Laver won 13 matches without a loss in defeating a field with Rosewall, Newcombe, Emerson, Okker, Ashe, Roche, Taylor and Ralston. Laver played a number of these players twice in winning $160,000 for the tournament, by far the richest amount won by a player. These were coveted tournaments and perhaps even more important than a major.
Laver also won the US Pro and French Pro in 1968 which were Pro Majors over extremely powerful fields that included players like Newcombe, Roche, Rosewall, Ralston, Buchholz, Pilic, Anderson, Gonzalez, Anderson, Drysdale in the the US Pro and Newcombe, Roche, Rosewall, Gimeno, Drysdale, Gonzalez, Taylor, Emerson, Segura, Anderson, Stolle, Pilic, Buchholz in the French Pro.
He also won a ton of Masters 1000 level tournaments like the 1971 Italian Open, the South African Open, the Pacific Southwest etc.
Laver won 76 total tournaments in the Open Era alone.
Analyze and decide for yourself. It's up to you.
I have no qualms with your list with or without Laver. Your list is fine with me. Incidentally I'm curious how much do you think Djokovic has to go to pass Nadal and later Sampras?