Nothing about comfort level and strung RA value in the review. That would have been both interesting and relevant I feel.
Nothing about comfort level and strung RA value in the review. That would have been both interesting and relevant I feel.
The written text in the video description says "a tad more comfortable than a pure drive". For me that is a reason to stay with my current strikes since they are "much more comfortable than a pure drive".
If only it had the paint scheme of the previous Strike, although white would be my second choice.
Suggest you demo the racquet before coming to such a conclusion. Without a demo, you may not know what you are missing
I'm stoked to see the TWU specs (twist weight and sweet zone). Definitely going to demo.
No it wouldn't.The video review makes it very clear that the reviews were conducted using a range of different strings so I can understand why they wouldn't mention strung RA values. It would introduce unnecessary confusion into the review.
No it wouldn't.
"-RA stiffness value varied between 66 and 67 depending on string choice so we feel it reminds us about X and Y but slightly more comfortable than Z."
No confusion.
It's on tennis warehouse's ytI don't actually see any of the Pure Strikes on either of the TW websites. Where was that review video found?
I totally agree with you that comfort is subjective.I challenge your implied assertion that lower RA values means "more" comfort. As I stated in my prev. post, "comfort" is a highly subjective characteristic.
You are actually a realistYou have to laugh when you examine the chronology of the Pure Strike: The racquet is basically brought into existence to be Tsonga's stand alone model (and an attempt to create a Babolat 'player's stick' that might actually sell); Tsonga drops the racquet like sixth period French - claiming his modified Aero+ has way more power - leaving the Strike flat lining in marketing limbo; just when all seems lost Thiem and his spectacular game rise to the top with his 'orphan' racquet going on to sell at a two for one discount and Babolat decide to play 'if at first you don't succeed...' and mildly revamp the Strike mould - and for good measure reposition the Control in the hope it will catch some of the sales hype pixie dust being generated. Before he pulled the pin,Tsonga was meant to be using a customised/weighted 27.5" version of the Strike 100, despite no plus length models being available retail and the existence of a heavier 'tour' model. Anyone know what Thiem is really using? Is he actually on board with the 'new' model? How will his game cope with such a radical change, and one made 'on the fly'?
I totally agree with you that comfort is subjective.
Which is exactly why I felt that the reviewers should utilize their unparalleled opportunity to share their thoughts on the matter.
and Thiem did not switch you can still see indent at 3 and 9 :
Nice!
I don't want to start a debate about "comfort" levels but how does someone else's opinion of "comfort" apply to your personal view of it if you haven't directly experienced it yourself?
X-sider is there for shure, that's old mold, but what about photos from us open?I see lead tape but I don't see indent.
Are you sure that the lead tape isn't creating a bit of an optical illusion that looks like an indent? Or are you talking about something else I'm not seeing in that picture?
In any case, why would you care either way. You aren't Dominic Thiem are you? So why do you care what racquet he uses anyway?
You are actually a realist
and Thiem did not switch you can still see indent at 3 and 9 :
Perhaps, but is the same not true of the other attributes that they talk of? Taken to its logical conclusion we would have no reviews, simply spec charts. And even then, if the experience is different in the hand of the player than it is on the objectively measured specs, why have them either? Of course it's preferable to experience all of this in a demo, but prior to that, and in helping us all to determine what to demo, I think there is a role for their reviews, including how the playtesters experience the comfort.
Could not find specs on TW website
I would like to see the specs of the PS16x19 and PS100
Anybody can help?
Thx
What kind of ridiculous rating! 94 on groundstrokes. That makes me just want to buy it straight up without demoing lol. I hope it lives up to the hype cuz I've never seen a racquet drastically improve that much from a previous iteration that was not well-liked at all.Got a 90 score!!
Looking forward to read the review for the PS100
Both are quite attractive
I talked to one of my colleagues at TWE this morning and he said, September 19th as well!@BabolatOfficial
Any word on when the racquets will be available on TW EU or more generally in Europe?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Check your eyes.I see lead tape but I don't see indent.
Are you sure that the lead tape isn't creating a bit of an optical illusion that looks like an indent? Or are you talking about something else I'm not seeing in that picture?
In any case, why would you care either way. You aren't Dominic Thiem are you? So why do you care what racquet he uses anyway?
I see lead tape but I don't see indent.
Are you sure that the lead tape isn't creating a bit of an optical illusion that looks like an indent? Or are you talking about something else I'm not seeing in that picture?
In any case, why would you care either way. You aren't Dominic Thiem are you? So why do you care what racquet he uses anyway?
Looking at TW website, there is no indent in their pictures. Nice pickup.Indent and unless they didn't change the bumper on the new one, this is a Pure Strike bumper (notice the little U shaped notches).
Agree. He is still playing with the older 18x20 PureStrike.Look at the pic again and zoom in...clear indentation. Also zoom in on the bumper guard...same as original pure strike just in black. Case closed!
What kind of ridiculous rating! 94 on groundstrokes. That makes me just want to buy it straight up without demoing lol. I hope it lives up to the hype cuz I've never seen a racquet drastically improve that much from a previous iteration that was not well-liked at all.
@atatu,
Sorry for any confusion. We do have the same criteria for each racquet. The scores will all be visible in the graph at the bottom of the review. In the past, we didn't show all of the different scores on the top box but in the last couple months have added all the criteria in the top box.
Thanks,
Brittany, TW
The scores on this racquet review are freaking OUT OF CONTROL.
Can someone find a racquet review that has this kind of rating that is not Federer's racquets?