I assume Murray would agree with you!I used the PT280 for a bit when they went on the cheap. I never could get used to/like the 18X20 string bed. I believe I posted around here that I had problems squaring the string bed to the ball. I do agree that spec-wise they were similar, but while the C10 feels like a virtual extension of my arm, the PT280 never did feel right.
I used the PT280 for a bit when they went on the cheap. I never could get used to/like the 18X20 string bed. I believe I posted around here that I had problems squaring the string bed to the ball. I do agree that spec-wise they were similar, but while the C10 feels like a virtual extension of my arm, the PT280 never did feel right.
I used gut mains and TiMO crosses for a number of years. I liked the feel of the TiMO in the crosses better than the mains with this gut hybrid. Even when the TiMO last some of the feel the bed still felt good and played really nice for longer than if the TiMO was in the mains. I had two C10's I used and I tried this main/cross combo with TiMO mains and gut crosses and the other as gut mains and TiMO crosses.I've actually gone back to Timo albeit 10 pounds looser than way back. 45 now. I'm going to hybrid it next.
I used gut mains and TiMO crosses for a number of years. I liked the feel of the TiMO in the crosses better than the mains with this gut hybrid. Even when the TiMO last some of the feel the bed still felt good and played really nice for longer than if the TiMO was in the mains. I had two C10's I used and I tried this main/cross combo with TiMO mains and gut crosses and the other as gut mains and TiMO crosses.
I am not sure if the current TiMO strings have changed composition since I stopped using that combination a few years back. Seems like these string companies are constantly tinkering with strings. Even the strings everyone likes they are constantly messing with a good product to make it worse for the consumer, i.e. Babolat gut. Or just outright stopping production to introduce the latest, greatest string composition that will change the way you play and make you a super star on the court. Four months later no one buys that latest, greatest string because it is nothing special. I wish I had kept an older set to compare that one to a new production version.
I agree, once you start seeing that you can almost see they are getting rid of stock to make room for something else that is "better".I too tried gut mains and TiMO crosses. I thought it was nice, but I just didn't have the control as I did with TiMO mains. I also tried gut in the crosses and thought that a waste of gut, but now I'm thinking.....
What tension(s) did you use with the TiMO mains and gut crosses?
Perhaps the gut makes the bed last longer since it doesn't lose tension and playabilty as the a full bed of TiMO ( or any poly) would. I notice that with poly crosses. I can tell the playability diminishes as the poly fades. Some faster than others , some a lot more playability lost as crosses with the gut.
I agree. Always the profit margin with these guys! I noticed TiMO is no longer produced in reels, I did find one but the writing is on the wall. ALU is close to TiMO albeit a bit more arm friendly so there's always that option.
I agree, once you start seeing that you can almost see they are getting rid of stock to make room for something else that is "better".
Very true. They aren't getting rid of their ca$h cow.Yeah, the one thing you know is that ALU will always be there.
Very true. They aren't getting rid of their ca$h cow.
I look froward to your review and thoughts using these strings.alrighty then based on your post above, yesterday I strung one up with Wilson Sensation 16 mains and TiMO 18 crosses at 54/51 and one with Gosen OGSM 16 mains and TiMO 18 crosses at the same tension. I'll play this weekend and report back my thoughts. thanks for the inspiration
I look froward to your review and thoughts using these strings.
Thanks for the update. Again, give us an update when you switch it back to the TiMO mains. I have two racquets I need to restring so I will wait to hear what your updated string report is.Going back to TiMO mains as quick as I can string them. For the first time in forever, I almost broke a racket. So frustrated yesterday. Lost the first set, switched midway in the 2nd and we came back and won.
Thank you for the latest update. I'd like to hear how well you like this combination and at the tension you settle on.@mctennis - sorry, I didn't see this. I have gone back to my signature set up, TiMO mains and Gosen crosses @50 pounds. That really makes the racket become an extension of my arm. The ball goes where intended. The only change I may make is to decrease the tension by 3 pounds, maybe today even. My arm fares well with this set up, and I may keep bumping down tension just to see. I am confounded by my newest acquisition, the ERT 300 as it tells me to restring when the string is feeling good.
@DANMAN, do you have specific frames in mind? I think if you do a search, you'd find others saying that the C10 Pro, as a MP frame, probably has a bit more pop compared to other MPs. I have played 6.1s, Radical Pros, Prestiges, Fishcer M Pros...etc, and Yes I will have to concur. It does have useful power, despite being very soft. Mine are 367-9 grams strung, and I used poly in the mains, syn gut in the crosses (52-55lbs). They do have nice power, and are very stable. Mine are pretty headlight (despite lead at 3 and 9) and have leather grips. I really cannot imagine playing with anything else at the moment, given the combo of flexibility, mass, power, 16 mains...etc. In case you are wondering, I am a 4.0 on a good day, and like Pro Red Code, Timo, Cyclone Tour, and Silversting in my mains.
Can anyone compare the C10 pro power wise to other frames on the market. I looked at the TWU scores and its percent of energy/speed returned it high at 41.7%. Only a few frames are clearly higher. Pure aeros are around 42% and the blade 98 16x19 was 43.2% which tells me numbers aren't everything.
Thanks in advance.
fuzz nation : What year/paintjob C10's are you using? I know some of the C10's are softer than others.
Was watching an interview with Roddick and Federer from a few years ago and they flashed this photo of Fed. I assume when he was a junior. Did he every play with a C10 Pro? Sure looks like a fish scale version to me.
His coach Peter Carter used it and is holding it in that pic.
Ahhhh. Racquets crossed. That makes total sense. I knew that Peter Carter, but I didn't know he used the C10. Thanks!
Thanks for the update and the great racquet review. I, for one, would not think this racquet would give such performance. Glad to see you liked it that much to buy two.I just demoed some Volkls. I hit with the V-Sense 9, V-Sense 8 315 and today the Super G10 295. The 8 & 9 were good. The G10 however was like a tonic. If you're a little older and love the C10, you may want to give the G10 295 a try. I found it played like the C10 (save for the noise which takes a bit of getting used to). It has more power, more maneuverability, as much control, and is a spin monster. The demo I tried was strung at 55 with Cyclone 17. The Cyclone played really lively in the frame. I enjoyed it so much, I bought two.
Let us know how these string set ups last before you cut them out. Poly's , for me, do not last very long. The optimum time for them lasts me about 6-8 hours. After that they are pretty useless for me to play with.Cheers, ^^ rj ^^ !!
Happy to report that the skinny poly hybrid has been a plus for my C10's. I set both of my newest ones up with 1.20mm Isospeed Baseline mains and 16 ga. syn. gut crosses. One has 54 lb. mains/57 lb. crosses, while the other one has the same layout at 56 lbs. for both - proceeding cautiously with this one. No noticeable issues (happy arm!!), but also no need to go any more snug. Just a better behaving package and I definitely thump my biggest serves with these frames, even with the poly hybrid.
Aside from maybe swapping some Tour Bite into this hybrid, I have no ambitions to try any other changes. A pal of mine is hot to try some TB hybrids, so we're going to grab a set or two and I'll string him up... Okay, maybe I'll also sneak a set of Cyclone, but the Baseline is so bananas cheap and easy to stock that I can't see getting excited about the premiums.
Let us know how these string set ups last before you cut them out. Poly's , for me, do not last very long. The optimum time for them lasts me about 6-8 hours. After that they are pretty useless for me to play with.
Thanks.
Thanks for the update and the great racquet review. I, for one, would not think this racquet would give such performance. Glad to see you liked it that much to buy two.
All the experiments are over....back to work with the C10s, TiMO and Gosen @ 52.
That experiment was short. Any reason or just back to old faithful?
By the way, any C10 users plan on trying the new V-Sense 10 325? I've been reading volkl is making it feel more old school with the updated beam shape. Could be a slightly more modern c10. I loved the super G 10 325, thought it was a better racket objectively than the c10, but man they feel nothing alike. This new c-sense may be the bridge between the 2.
Ahhhh. The Universe back on its track.All the experiments are over....back to work with the C10s, TiMO and Gosen @ 52.
Yeah, the Super G 10 295 is a fine frame. It's just a bit light. The Pure Drive felt like crap and hurt my shoulder after one match and it was strung with gut.
The G10 325 looks every bit a C10....even the same paint. Diff?
Thanks for the final string choice. So TiMO 18 and the Gosen OG Sheep Micro, both at 52? I will give that combo a try.All the experiments are over....back to work with the C10s, TiMO and Gosen @ 52.
Yes, that rock hard feel is something I HATE. I can't play very well with that constant "jarring" type feeling with every shot. I like a string with more feedback.If I hit a bad shot with other strings I can tell if I mishit it and how I mishit it. With board like strings it is like hitting it with a piece of plywood.I'll have to restring one of them and use it non-stop to get an idea of how they hold up over time. Unfortunately I'm keeping a pair of C10's in the bag along with a pair of O10's that I string with 16 ga. syn. gut. Those behave fine with that string at 58 or 60 lbs., but the C10's are my big hitters and the skinny poly hybrid has given me a more consistent response without feeling rock hard.
I cut one set out and replaced it after maybe your 6-8 hour stretch, but I don't think it was necessarily used up. Since that was my first trial, I used rather low tension - maybe poly mains at 50 or 52 and crosses at 55 or 56. After it worked in, it seemed a bit close to the soft margin for me.
The fun experiment will likely be restringing both C10's at the same time. The skinny poly hybrid in one and the other roped up with full syn. gut at maybe 60 lbs. ought to make for a nice little Pepsi Challenge. Just need to track the service life with some accuracy.
Ahhhh. The Universe back on its track.
Thanks for the final string choice. So TiMO 18 and the Gosen OG Sheep Micro, both at 52? I will give that combo a try.
Yes, that rock hard feel is something I HATE. I can't play very well with that constant "jarring" type feeling with every shot. I like a string with more feedback.If I hit a bad shot with other strings I can tell if I mishit it and how I mishit it. With board like strings it is like hitting it with a piece of plywood.
Keep us updated I am always willing to try some other string combos that others find that work in the C10's.