Cincinnati - the real Slam

Today's semifinals feature the top 4 players. Unlike the last 2 "Slams". I contend that whoever wins here is the real #1 and the GOAT. I have a feeling it won't be the guy with the elegant strokes.
Whether bee el oh double-you es or just plain "blows," one thing's for certain:

this thread blows.
 

stringertom

Bionic Poster
Federer never really cared all that much about Cincinnati (at least not more than any other MS tournament) until this thread was created. Thank you, sureshs, good job.
Yes, the need to rejoice in the sureshsian vortex and thus achieve such greatness only became apparent as a result of Poobian pretzel logic. thank you mr sureshs!:D
 

sbengte

G.O.A.T.
Today's semifinals feature the top 4 players. Unlike the last 2 "Slams". I contend that whoever wins here is the real #1 and the GOAT. I have a feeling it won't be the guy with the elegant strokes.

Trolololol...the thread that keeps on giving 6 years later....

282dzs9.jpg
 

D.Nalby12

G.O.A.T.
Written on August 2009:

Fact is, Fed is up against 3 players who have all beaten him in the past, and who share the attribute of not having too much love for him. Quite different from a Roddick or Del Potro or Haas or Soderling who lose a match to him before the first serve is struck. This is his real test as a champion.


August 2015:

Federer def. Murray 6-4 7-6
Federer def. Djokovic 7-6 6-3.
Real Slam winner - Federer (For 5th time)

Fail Level: Out of this World.
 

THE FIGHTER

Hall of Fame
Because, when you are a defending champion everybody is gearing up towards taking you down. Everybody is playing with that extra motivation against you.

Defending means that you met the challengers and defeated them, when you were in the center of the things and there was a target on your forehead. The alpha male.

Hitting when flying under the radar (i.e. when nobody expects you to do so well) can be attributed partly to the surprise element. There is no surprise element when you are the defending champ.

Of course that nothing disappears form the statistics! Why would you even say that, when it is obvious?

Well, that, but more importantly a player is defending points when attempting a title defense.

If the title is not defended, his ranking points go down. Thats why commentators, players, et al use verbiage like, "no/very little/a lot of points to defend"
 

jelle v

Hall of Fame
I could not help but to think of this thread when I was watching the final... :D

On top of that he beat Djokovic and Murray, the #1 and #2 of the world at that time.. LOL!!
 

Mainad

Bionic Poster
I could not help but to think of this thread when I was watching the final... :D

On top of that he beat Djokovic and Murray, the #1 and #2 of the world at that time.. LOL!!

Apparently, it was the first time he did this to win a tournament!
 

gn

G.O.A.T.
Fact is, Fed is up against 3 players who have all beaten him in the past, and who share the attribute of not having too much love for him. Quite different from a Roddick or Del Potro or Haas or Soderling who lose a match to him before the first serve is struck. This is his real test as a champion.

How wrong it turned out to be!
 

Zebrev

Hall of Fame
Can someone explain the joke here. What is the significance of "the real slam" and what is "the gift that keeps on giving"?
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Can someone explain the joke here. What is the significance of "the real slam" and what is "the gift that keeps on giving"?
I don't know about the latter, but with regards to "the real slam", Sureshs had pointed out that at that time the semis were occupied by the Big 4, thus labeling it the real slam and that there was no way Fed was going to win the event in that scenarion.

Of course 2 days later, a huge egg was thrown on his face as Fed steamrolled through Murray and Djoker in the semis and final.

Since then, Cincy has been labeled the Real Slam, further evidence that Fed is GOAT ;)
 

HipRotation

Hall of Fame
Can someone explain the joke here. What is the significance of "the real slam" and what is "the gift that keeps on giving"?
I don't know about the latter, but with regards to "the real slam", Sureshs had pointed out that at that time the semis were occupied by the Big 4, thus labeling it the real slam and that there was no way Fed was going to win the event in that scenarion.

Of course 2 days later, a huge egg was thrown on his face as Fed steamrolled through Murray and Djoker in the semis and final.

Since then, Cincy has been labeled the Real Slam, further evidence that Fed is GOAT ;)

It also stems from the fact that Federer had won the pervious two Slams without facing any of the Big 4 and had lost the last 4 matches to Murray and 2 to Djokovic. So Sureshs took the plunge and declared Cincinnati to be the "Real Slam" as in his mind it would be the actual test of ability compared to the weak draws of pervious slams.
 
D

Deleted member 733170

Guest
It also stems from the fact that Federer had won the pervious two Slams without facing any of the Big 4 and had lost the last 4 matches to Murray and 2 to Djokovic. So Sureshs took the plunge and declared Cincinnati to be the "Real Slam" as in his mind it would be the actual test of ability compared to the weak draws of pervious slams.

"So Sureshs took the plunge..." lol

And to finish the fairytale Roger has been trolling Sureshs ever since...
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
It also stems from the fact that Federer had won the pervious two Slams without facing any of the Big 4 and had lost the last 4 matches to Murray and 2 to Djokovic. So Sureshs took the plunge and declared Cincinnati to be the "Real Slam" as in his mind it would be the actual test of ability compared to the weak draws of pervious slams.
It wouldn't have mattered anyway. Fed beat the real in form players at those slams.

I actually believe Fed would have had an easier time with Djoker at RG than with Delpo and an easier time with Murray at Wimb than with Roddick.

And he proved that by straight setting Djoker in their only slam match that year.
 
Top