LololololBehind ... Connors.
What about Rafa ? He made 5 consecutive finals in peak grass perod .
No chance in hell he surpasses Sampras, I even doubt it with Borg.I would say 4th but he will end his career second.
Behind Federer, Sampras, Borg, Edberg, Becker, Mac, and Connors, and that's just the Open era.
They weren't consecutive. He skipped in 2009 because his mommy and daddy had a fight.
Do Laver and Newcombe rank after Murray in open era?Open Era Wimbledon champions
1. Federer
2. Sampras
3. Borg
4. Djokovic
5. McEnroe
6. Becker
7. Edberg
8. Connors
9. Nadal
10. Murray
What's so funny? They've got as many majors on grass as each other, Connors has more finals, he's won grass court majors in 3 different places, and he's got 9 grass court titles compared to 5. If he didn't have to deal with guys like Newcombe and McEnroe who the surface catered so massively towards he might have a couple more. They're both such similar, baseline first, backhand lead players, and that Connors accomplished as much as he did on grass the way it used to play is a pretty remarkable thing. He beat McEnroe at Wimbledon when it was something close to impossible, he'd die to be playing Wimbledon on this **** they do now. Djokovic just defended his way to the Wimbledon title, I laugh at the idea he's one of the genuine all time greats.Lolololol
2009 doesn't count as Rafa was injured
What about Rafa ? He made 5 consecutive finals in peak grass perod .
2009 doesn't count as Rafa was injured
Not just no, HEEEEEEEELLLLLLL NOWhat's so funny? They've got as many majors on grass as each other, Connors has more finals, he's won grass court majors in 3 different places, and he's got 9 grass court titles compared to 5. If he didn't have to deal with guys like Newcombe and McEnroe who the surface catered so massively towards he might have a couple more. They're both such similar, baseline first, backhand lead players, and that Connors accomplished as much as he did on grass the way it used to play is a pretty remarkable thing. He beat McEnroe at Wimbledon when it was something close to impossible, he'd die to be playing Wimbledon on this **** they do now. Djokovic just defended his way to the Wimbledon title, I laugh at the idea he's one of the genuine all time greats.
Literally, Emerson and Tilden have 10 grass court majors, Laver 9, Perry and Newcombe 7, Rosewall 6, but these are the gods of grass.Funnily enough, nobody played tennis on grass until 1968. So Fred Perry, Bill Tilden, Rod Laver, Lew Hoad, etc, can be comfortably ignored in this discussion.
Nadal always has some excuse, doesn't he?
Literally, Emerson and Tilden have 10 grass court majors, Laver 9, Perry and Newcombe 7, Rosewall 6, but these are the gods of grass.
how many matches did he win against Fed and Rafa on grass?Connors won 2 Wimbledons, a US Open and an Australian Open on grass, plus a few Queen's Club titles.
That's kind of like saying Federer has almost twice as many Majors as Rod Laver.What's so funny? They've got as many majors on grass as each other
I guess you're going to be spending a good part of the next 50 years laughing then.I laugh at the idea he's one of the genuine all time greats.
how many matches did he win against Fed and Rafa on grass?
Do Laver and Newcombe rank after Murray in open era?
Yeah, do you? He did next to nothing for the first two sets today, just sat back and let Anderson implode. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but to suggest it makes him one of the absolute best grass court players ever is a laugh. He's got a very good serve that has helped him a long way, but that's about the only part of his game that genuinely makes me think he'd do well on grass any time any where. Would he be so able to neutralize these big servers bombs on a grass court where the ball doesn't kick up a metre in the air?Not just no, HEEEEEEEELLLLLLL NO
And lol at “defending his way” do you even watch these matches? Ffs
Achievement level: Djokovic > Nadal
Peak level: Nadal > Djokovic
Edberg won 2 Australian Opens on the grass of Kooyong that played like Wimbledon today, and 2 Wimbledon's on the grass of old. Shows a lot more grass greatness to me. Connors too won grass court majors all over the place on grass courts that didn't cater so massively to his game. Don't let context stand in the way of your count.He's behind Edberg and Connors when he has double the Wimbledon titles? LMAO.
There’s no arguing with blindness. We literally just had 3 straight days where Novak bombed pinpoint serves, dictated with his FH and BH, bit 70ish winners against Rafa and neutralized Anderson’s massive serve but still biased idiots spew nonsense. It is what it is. Djoker won, have a seatYeah, do you? He did next to nothing for the first two sets today, just sat back and let Anderson implode. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but to suggest it makes him one of the absolute best grass court players ever is a laugh. He's got a very good serve that has helped him a long way, but that's about the only part of his game that genuinely makes me think he'd do well on grass any time any where. Would he be so able to neutralize these big servers bombs on a grass court where the ball doesn't kick up a metre in the air?
What's so funny? They've got as many majors on grass as each other, Connors has more finals, he's won grass court majors in 3 different places, and he's got 9 grass court titles compared to 5. If he didn't have to deal with guys like Newcombe and McEnroe who the surface catered so massively towards he might have a couple more. They're both such similar, baseline first, backhand lead players, and that Connors accomplished as much as he did on grass the way it used to play is a pretty remarkable thing. He beat McEnroe at Wimbledon when it was something close to impossible, he'd die to be playing Wimbledon on this **** they do now. Djokovic just defended his way to the Wimbledon title, I laugh at the idea he's one of the genuine all time greats.
Edberg won 2 Australian Opens on the grass of Kooyong that played like Wimbledon today, and 2 Wimbledon's on the grass of old. Shows a lot more grass greatness to me. Connors too won grass court majors all over the place on grass courts that didn't cater so massively to his game. Don't let context stand in the way of your count.
This too but I didn’t even bother arguing cause Edbergs a class act and was a great serve and volleyer worthy of respect. Connors is just trashEdberg did win two AO titles on grass but 2 AO titles + 2 Wimbledon titles is not equal to 4 Wimbledon titles. Djokovic is greater since he won the most coveted trophy 4 times when Edberg did it twice. No one is going to rank Edberg over him when they look back over history.
Achievement level: Djokovic > Nadal
Peak level: Nadal > Djokovic
Damn, what a great argument.Yes, he bombed pinpoint serves, that was great. Dictated with his forehand and backhand? Are you kidding me? You're calling me blind? He was defending and defending like there was no tomorrow in that semi final. The dictating he did was minimal. Over 20 of his 70ish winners were the aforementioned aces, he was hardly slaying off the ground. And yes, he neutralized Anderson's serve, again, ball kicking up the way it does on todays grass makes that a lot easier than it was for someone like Agassi, or the aforementioned Connors (granted, the serves were not as big then). You calling other people biased. Nice one. Try acting like you weren't born yesterday. All I've said is he's in the bottom half of the ten greatest grass courters of the open era, and everyone's having a meltdown. Poor dears.There’s no arguing with blindness. We literally just had 3 straight days where Novak bombed pinpoint serves, dictated with his FH and BH, bit 70ish winners against Rafa and neutralized Anderson’s massive serve but still biased idiots spew nonsense. It is what it is. Piiss off
Lol no.Damn, what a great argument.Yes, he bombed pinpoint serves, that was great. Dictated with his forehand and backhand? Are you kidding me? You're calling me blind? He was defending and defending like there was no tomorrow in that semi final. The dictating he did was minimal. Over 20 of his 70ish winners were the aforementioned aces, he was hardly slaying off the ground. And yes, he neutralized Anderson's serve, again, ball kicking up the way it does on todays grass makes that a lot easier than it was for someone like Agassi, or the aforementioned Connors (granted, the serves were not as big then). You calling other people biased. Nice one. Try acting like you weren't born yesterday. All I've said is he's in the bottom half of the ten greatest grass courters of the open era, and everyone's having a meltdown. Poor dears.
You're saying he'll win 3 more Wimbledons?I would say 4th but he will end his career second.
God, I'm really not crying, nor salty, nor bitter. It's the day of the Wimbledon final and I'm talking tennis, god forbid.Cry more
Uhh do you mean century? Federer doesn’t have a season in this decade on that levelDjokovic's 2011 and 2015 were better than any seasons had by any ATP player this decade not named Roger Federer
What's so funny? They've got as many majors on grass as each other, Connors has more finals, he's won grass court majors in 3 different places, and he's got 9 grass court titles compared to 5. If he didn't have to deal with guys like Newcombe and McEnroe who the surface catered so massively towards he might have a couple more. They're both such similar, baseline first, backhand lead players, and that Connors accomplished as much as he did on grass the way it used to play is a pretty remarkable thing. He beat McEnroe at Wimbledon when it was something close to impossible, he'd die to be playing Wimbledon on this **** they do now. Djokovic just defended his way to the Wimbledon title, I laugh at the idea he's one of the genuine all time greats.
You can't just add their wins in other grass court majors. Who's to say how many grass court majors Djoker would have if 3 out of 4 majors were played on grass today?Edberg won 2 Australian Opens on the grass of Kooyong that played like Wimbledon today, and 2 Wimbledon's on the grass of old. Shows a lot more grass greatness to me. Connors too won grass court majors all over the place on grass courts that didn't cater so massively to his game. Don't let context stand in the way of your count.
Uhh do you mean century? Federer doesn’t have a season in this decade on that level
I don't know what to say, that's a very simplistic way of thinkingEdberg did win two AO titles on grass but 2 AO titles + 2 Wimbledon titles is not equal to 4 Wimbledon titles. Djokovic is greater since he won the most coveted trophy 4 times when Edberg did it twice. No one is going to rank Edberg over him when they look back over history.