I never saw this frame personally, but on photos seems that it has a thicker beam(I hate this cosmetics...) like Burn or Ultra.
So,my simples question is:
-How can a thicker beam be translated in low RA?!?!Wich materials are used?
Curious...
Enviado do meu iPhone usando o Tapatalk
Bingo! This is the question that engineers from competitor R&D departments try to answer.
The racquet is super flexible while having a constant beam width. That means that the beam is thick on the throat area as well. RDC and RA actually shows how flexible a racquet is on the throat area.
Wilson comes up with a frame and says: We rock, it has low RA even if with a thick beam on the throat area, but we do not bother to use RA measurements. In fact if Wilson Class would come with a tappered beam and thin throat (such as Yonex DR98) then the RA would drop below 30 (it would be a very bad Clash).
IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT THE RDC SHOWS...
What matters is how can you make a truly (truly = non RA) flexible racquet, and stable at the same time? Apparently it needs to be a thick beam, constant beam width, and then what?
Is it an innovative technology from Wilson? Is it a scam similar to the Head iIntelligence? At least Wilson has not claimed that the racquet has a Chip inside the frame. Maybe there is not any innovation as Wilson claims, and it is just a tiny piece of wood in the throat area, but in each case Wilson Clash delivers on court what it says.
The time will come, and I will soon dissect a Wilson Clash, literally tear it appart!