I've been reading a lot of things on racket customization and trying to figure out the best set-up for my game i just have a few questions for some experts out there. I've been playing tennis for 10 years, 24 years old, I'm a 4.5-5.0 player. My game is pretty much what it is, I just want to maximize my strengths by doing some equipment mods. My goal is to get to 350-360 SW just to challenge myself and see if i can play with a pro spec racket.
My racket is a Yonex DR 98 & after being strung and adding 3 over grips i was at 323 g (11.4 oz), 10-11 pts HL. I believe My SW is around 310-315 and not 324 as listed on TW, due to my racket being under spec weight wise and more HL.
I know polarized rackets SW > static weight
* for example Wilson Blade at 320g and 326 SW
* Carlos Moya, Henin, Fognini, Fed, Nadal
*better for topspin, manuverability, clay courters
versus depolarized which would be static weight > SW
*prince phantom 93p 343g and 330 SW
*sampras, djokovic, agassi, blake
*better for all court game style, flatter hitting, volleys
My racket is 323g and my SW is 310 roughly which would mean it's slightly depolarized already.
In order for me to get to 360 SW the two extremes would be
1. add 15g of lead at 12, which would give me 339g and 355-360 SW 6 pts HL (more polarized)
2. add 30g of lead at 3 and 9 which would give me 354g and 355-360 SW 6 pts HL (still polarized, just not as much as the first option, a lot more twist weight)
Now of course i don't plan to do this all at once, but over time i would like to slowly add weight to get to 360 SW.
So my questions are...
1. I'm hearing that adding weight at 3 & 9 can flatten strokes and reduce spin, would a set up that has a lot of weight at 3 & 9 have WORSE spin access than the stock form of the racket with no weight at 3 & 9 and lower SW?? I'm worried if i choose the second option I will loose spin, however in stock form I have more than enough spin for my gamestyle.
2. Would both set-ups be equal in maneuverability ? or would the higher twist weight of the second option make the second option less maneuverable?
3. Should Federer be grouped in with other polarized set-ups because his static weight is 364 g with SW being 355-360, compared to Moya who is much more extreme
4. What are the downsides of high twistweight? How do you know when it's too high?
5. It seems like adding weight at 3 & 9 is still slightly polarizing the racket no? maybe not as much as 12 o clock, but I feel like extreme depolarization would be either in the buttcap or throat correct?
6. Which option would be better for a slice backhand? I love my slice backhand and I use it quite frequently
I'm leaning towards the second option because I am more of an all court baseliner (I like to stay at the baseline but serve and volley on occasion to throw in variety, and use my slice backhand a lot, plus dropshots) and I don't really play on clay. Ultimately only I will know what racket is best after playing with both, but i would love to hear some of you guys' experiences so I have modded both my DR 98's
*More polarized set up
6g of lead at 12 o clock (330g, 330 SW, 9 pts HL)
*More Depolarized set up
12g of lead at 3 and 9 (338g, 330 SW, 9 pts HL)
I have already hit with the more polarized set-up for a week now and It's doing okay. I do notice more spin than stock form, however it is slightly unforgiving. More un-returned serves which is nice. But i think thats due to the higher SW. I'm excited to try the more depolarized set-up this week though!
Will report back soon!
My racket is a Yonex DR 98 & after being strung and adding 3 over grips i was at 323 g (11.4 oz), 10-11 pts HL. I believe My SW is around 310-315 and not 324 as listed on TW, due to my racket being under spec weight wise and more HL.
I know polarized rackets SW > static weight
* for example Wilson Blade at 320g and 326 SW
* Carlos Moya, Henin, Fognini, Fed, Nadal
*better for topspin, manuverability, clay courters
versus depolarized which would be static weight > SW
*prince phantom 93p 343g and 330 SW
*sampras, djokovic, agassi, blake
*better for all court game style, flatter hitting, volleys
My racket is 323g and my SW is 310 roughly which would mean it's slightly depolarized already.
In order for me to get to 360 SW the two extremes would be
1. add 15g of lead at 12, which would give me 339g and 355-360 SW 6 pts HL (more polarized)
2. add 30g of lead at 3 and 9 which would give me 354g and 355-360 SW 6 pts HL (still polarized, just not as much as the first option, a lot more twist weight)
Now of course i don't plan to do this all at once, but over time i would like to slowly add weight to get to 360 SW.
So my questions are...
1. I'm hearing that adding weight at 3 & 9 can flatten strokes and reduce spin, would a set up that has a lot of weight at 3 & 9 have WORSE spin access than the stock form of the racket with no weight at 3 & 9 and lower SW?? I'm worried if i choose the second option I will loose spin, however in stock form I have more than enough spin for my gamestyle.
2. Would both set-ups be equal in maneuverability ? or would the higher twist weight of the second option make the second option less maneuverable?
3. Should Federer be grouped in with other polarized set-ups because his static weight is 364 g with SW being 355-360, compared to Moya who is much more extreme
4. What are the downsides of high twistweight? How do you know when it's too high?
5. It seems like adding weight at 3 & 9 is still slightly polarizing the racket no? maybe not as much as 12 o clock, but I feel like extreme depolarization would be either in the buttcap or throat correct?
6. Which option would be better for a slice backhand? I love my slice backhand and I use it quite frequently
I'm leaning towards the second option because I am more of an all court baseliner (I like to stay at the baseline but serve and volley on occasion to throw in variety, and use my slice backhand a lot, plus dropshots) and I don't really play on clay. Ultimately only I will know what racket is best after playing with both, but i would love to hear some of you guys' experiences so I have modded both my DR 98's
*More polarized set up
6g of lead at 12 o clock (330g, 330 SW, 9 pts HL)
*More Depolarized set up
12g of lead at 3 and 9 (338g, 330 SW, 9 pts HL)
I have already hit with the more polarized set-up for a week now and It's doing okay. I do notice more spin than stock form, however it is slightly unforgiving. More un-returned serves which is nice. But i think thats due to the higher SW. I'm excited to try the more depolarized set-up this week though!
Will report back soon!
Last edited: