Tennis sensation
Legend
Nadal holds
3-0
3-0
I've never seen a guy Miss so many easy returns
Nope, this IS tennis.Nope. This isn’t beach volleyball.
Yeah we now have the right to just respond with "STFU" if any of them reply to us. lol. Frauds.Didn't you love the fake news of Novak storming out the other day after bullying the organizers to suspend the match and without waiting to see if the match would be called? The lengths some of these people will go...
Forget it man, this guy got no class, unlike Federer.
Djokovic loses to Thiem but it's Nadal who "escapes" him. "Yet again" makes this even more ridiculous.Nadal escapes Djokovic yet again. Must have had a party last night when he saw what happened.
Sad.
Not unreturnable by any means. You can't mug up these returns if you want to win slams.GTFO people, those were good serves on break points.
Maybe Wimby TOs will be nice and let Nadal withdraw and re-enter as a wild card.Not theoretically possible, they're on opposite halves.
Nope, this IS tennis.
Again, in a surface using a shot that's been used and has been effective since clay was used to play TENNIS.
Also, that argument is devoid of logic as well, it's like saying that a smash isn't tennis because it seems like a shot used in badminton.
You not only do not know basic things about tennis, but your basic logic is pretty weak as well, wow.
Thiem is mentally fatigued, not physically. Nadal is too intense for a bit too long in these kinds of matches
Rafa's confidence and net game will translate very well. I agree.Look at the positives, the grass season starts in 15 minutes.
GTFO people, those were good serves on break points.
Isn't it? I thought Fed could be the #2 seed if he won Halle and Nadal didn't pick up any points.
Tennis sold it's soul for that AO17 final ... how has almost every final since been one of the worst matches of the tournament?
Yeah we now have the right to just respond with "STFU" if any of them reply to us. lol. Frauds.
Yep, keep barking. You are the AndyM of the Federer fans. Don't bother replying.Right. Because completely misrepresenting what I said and then refusing to provide evidence when asked is “classy”?
Lmao
Nope, this IS tennis.
Again, in a surface using a shot that's been used and has been effective since clay was used to play TENNIS.
Also, that argument is devoid of logic as well, it's like saying that a smash isn't tennis because it seems like a shot used in badminton.
You not only do not know basic things about tennis, but your basic logic is pretty weak as well, wow.