Skip is a salty ex-girlfriend who low-key follows you on Facebook.Kawhi icing the game like a man. Can't wait to hear Skip complain tomorrow.
THE fix was in.
Some people made a bus load of cash because of this series. And that's a fact.
Great for Raptors cause they played superb, and the league's expansion plan.
But this final smells very fishy. It would be naive to think otherwise.
THE fix was in.
Some people made a bus load of cash because of this series. And that's a fact.
Great for Raptors cause they played superb, and the league's expansion plan.
But this final smells very fishy. It would be naive to think otherwise.
They will always have the AlouettesFunny many people in Montreal were cheering and celebrating for a team from Toronto last night. Lol
I know it's a cliche, but horrible officiating all series going both ways. Some egregious calls made this game too (I'm talking Kawhi charge, counsins goaltending foul and Cook/Lowry collision). Not to mention the why-the-hell-not time extension after the foul on Kawhi at the end of the game
Lendl, who?
They have Canadiens and crazy about them.They will always have the Alouettes
Who?They have Canadiens and crazy about them.
Paranoid schizophrenic?THE fix was in.
Some people made a bus load of cash because of this series. And that's a fact.
Great for Raptors cause they played superb, and the league's expansion plan.
But this final smells very fishy. It would be naive to think otherwise.
I know it's a cliche, but horrible officiating all series going both ways. Some egregious calls made this game too (I'm talking Kawhi charge, counsins goaltending foul and Cook/Lowry collision). Not to mention the why-the-hell-not time extension after the foul on Kawhi at the end of the game
Curry says he makes this shot all day long in practice...Had a pretty good look. But shot way off.
"The best shooter ever" needs to step up and do better in final shots.
Look at VanVleet hustle for the offensive rebound, with 6 seconds still left, while Curry just stands around.
TBF nearly all players fail more often than not in potential game-tying/winning shots. Agreed on his lack of hustle in the end, but he really should've tried for a better shot. 9.6 seconds is plenty of time for a good old-fashioned P&R, for one.
The great ones step up in the final seconds. If Curry wants to lay claim to "best shooter ever", he needs to do better when the game is on the line. Agreed that it makes no sense to be going for three when down by only one. IMO, that is a horrible call but as you say that is a reflection of Curry's limited athleticism which forces him to heave up a three when down by one.
Yes, there is a difference between a scorer and a shooter. Curry is likely the best three point shooter ever but he has struggled in final seconds. A GOAT needs to do better at crunch time. Compare and contrast Curry's numbers with LeBron and MJ.
Curry has gone 0-for-8 on go-ahead shots with less than 20 seconds left in his NBA playoff career. He's played 112 postseason games.The latest miss in crunch time came when Curry was short on a potential game-winning three-pointer — off a well-designed Steve Kerr play with 10 seconds left and the Warriors trailing by one — a shot he's hit countless times throughout his career.
And I've seen that about Curry, and while it's not a good look for him we just agreed that this was not "a well-designed Steve Kerr play" but somehow the player is still getting flak for taking the shot as if on a whim. That's one thing, and another is that we can see Steph barely stops on the arc upon catching the pass before launching the fateful trey with Ibaka's hand in his face. I rather doubt either MJ or LBJ connects on many of those, provided that either even gets the shot off in the first place as neither has as quick a release as Steph. So why did he attempt such a low-% 3 to begin with? Is that because he didn't try harder to create more space or lose his guy, or maybe because, as that critical article itself notes, it's "a shot he's hit countless times throughout his career"? In other words we're dissing him for being too good a shooter to have failed, which is almost a compliment if you ask me. And though I don't know exactly how his other 7 go-ahead shots went down I bet those were considerably tricker or at least longer-range than MJ's or LBJ's.
To say he's "not clutch" for missing those shots (though the headline is somewhat kinder with its "struggled" angle) strikes me as myopic at best. Most sportswriters simply don't know what they're talking about, and Gleeson is no exception.
Yes, the article states it's "a shot he's hit countless times throughout his career". But it is still at a relatively low percentage shot for him (45% odds at best). Don't like that play. Granted Kerr's options may be limited with KT out.
Does MJ and LeBron make that shot? No, because with plenty of time left (9 seconds) and down by only one, they are both driving to the basket instead of heaving a desperation three.
Terrible matchup? You made it sound like Nadal vs Fedr at RG.The Raptors are a terrible matchup for GS without KD. Lol at thinking they won because the fix was in.
Paranoid schizophrenic?
I feel like we're talking past each other here. If we agree that it's Steve Kerr who drew up that play then the bulk of the blame falls on Kerr the coach and not Curry the player. Now we may well learn later on that Steph did get carried away and launched the low-% trey himself that ended his team's 3-peat run at which point he'll be rightly criticized, but I don't think we know that yet.
Almost a given that MJ would do a P&R because Phil would demand it. Not so sure about LBJ because he's known for defying his coaches in the past, but yeah most likely he'd try his patented left-to-right spin move which I doubt would've worked against the Toronto D (read: Kawhi) in a half court, and barring that he'd probably go for a fallback jumper, not a trey unless he was running out of time.
We had discussions about PG13 calling The Dame’s series ending trey a bad shot and some I heard from the analysts about set plays from the perimeter being less risky than drives to the basket in the final seconds. In a GWing situation the zebras tend to swallow their whistles unless it’s an obvious hack on the shooter.My point is that Curry has no business launching a three when down by only one. Curry needs to develop his game so that he/Kerry is not reliant on drawing up a low percentage three-point play in that situation. 10 seconds is plenty of time to draw up a higher percentage play. So yes, I ultimately place the blame on Curry, even if it was a called play.
There is practically zero chance that Raptors are gonna be dumb enough to foul him on a last-second three. So it's do or die.
Curry was 3/11 for threes. 3/6 for twos...27% odds vs 50% odds. ... Never mind the fact Curry is 0/8 on go-ahead shots in final seconds of a playoff game.
Curry needs to have the confidence to drive to the basket. Plus there is a much greater chance of drawing the foul on a two-pointer.
Kerr and cousins were also trying to get a timeout. It was intentional I believe. Only way to even have a remote chance.Excellent playoffs by Draymond who led all players in rebounds and assists.
@stringertom Do you think Draymond knew that there were no time outs left and intentionally called TO to stop the clock? That really shows great presence of mind.
Is Draymond that smart?
Regardless of whether Kerr called the play or not, my point is that Curry has no business launching a three when down by only one.
There is practically zero chance that Raptors are gonna be dumb enough to foul him on a last-second three. So it's do or die.
Curry was 3/11 for threes. 3/6 for twos...27% odds vs 50% odds.
Curry needs to have the confidence to drive to the basket and 2 pointer. Plus there is a much better chance of drawing the foul on a two-pointer.
I ultimately place the blame on Curry, even if it was a called play by Kerr. Curry needs to develop his game so that he/Kerry is not reliant on a three-pointer in that situation.
We had discussions about PG13 calling The Dame’s series ending trey a bad shot and some I heard from the analysts about set plays from the perimeter being less risky than drives to the basket in the final seconds. In a GWing situation the zebras tend to swallow their whistles unless it’s an obvious hack on the shooter.
It’s a make or miss league these days. In the fourth quarter of Game 5, GSW made three straight treys to win the game. In Game 6, FVV made a couple of treys to build the lead and they hung on to win because Curry missed a trey on a fairly decent look. Simple as that.
@stringertom Do you think Draymond knew that there were no time outs left and intentionally called TO to stop the clock? That really shows great presence of mind.
Is Draymond that smart?
Kerr and cousins were also trying to get a timeout. It was intentional I believe. Only way to even have a remote chance.
Disagree. The coach made his call and the player followed it. Unless you think overruling your coach down the stretch a la LBJ is a swell idea I don't see how you can pin this on Steph.
Also the video you posted yourself shows at least three Raptors ready to swarm him should he decide to drive to the basket. It's not so clear that would've been a much higher-% play for the Dubs.
Remember there was no timeout so it wasn't set up. They just wanted to give the ball to Kawhi and hope for the best. They didn't know what to do when he had to give the ball back.Raptors were in an identical situation in Game 5. Down by only 1. Set it up for Kawhi to go for two. Kawhi was double-teamed
Remember there was no timeout so it wasn't set up. They just wanted to give the ball to Kawhi and hope for the best. They didn't know what to do when he had to give the ball back.
Kerr designed the last play very well IMO. If it had went in Raps would only tie when they score a 2 pt shot and GSW would still be alive and can win in OT. If it didn't, they had a better chance for a rebound and there was enough time. Good coaching from Kerr.
Heh, Kawhi might be lying low now but the same can't be said of the Canucks:
https://www.cbc.ca/sports/basketball/nba/why-kawhi-leonard-should-stay-in-toronto-1.5175435
286 comments and counting. Pretty sure even last nite's report about the big win didn't attract as many comments (though that might well be because everyone was out celebrating). Wild!
Agree that Curry must follow Kerry's play. I'm saying Curry, in general, needs to develop his game so that Kerry is confident in calling for a drive to the basket. The stats speak for themselves. Curry was 3/11 from deep and 3/6 for two. And, you are asking Curry to hit a game-winning shot when he is 0/8 in that playoff scenario...The long Curry shot, down by only one, even with the best three-pointer shooter ever, was a low percentage play in that situation.
Raptors were in an identical situation in Game 5. Down by only 1. Set it up for Kawhi to go for two. Kawhi was double-teamed
and passed it. Likewise, Curry should have driven in. If nothing there, pass it off to open Green or Iggy or Cook or Cousins. That would be much more preferable.