In that case, I guess we can shut down the ATP, WTA, and the ITF, since the majors are independent of all other organizations.But,common it's all about Slams.
If it was all about slams then why do people think Murray was so good??????????Ok. 6 finals in a row is crazy achievment. He could won 5 if luck was just a little bit on his side.
But,common it's all about Slams.
As long as Medo never win any GS, all M1000 and crazy form is IF,IF,IF...
I would still prefered Gaudio 2004 season over Medvedev 2019 ANY DAY.
Djokovic: 17 in 2015.It's not overrated when 4 of the 6 are 1000's or above, and 1 of them is a slam. Who was the last guy to play 6 finals in a row?
Exactly. This is not something just anybody does, ever.Djokovic: 17 in 2015.
It's not overrated when 4 of the 6 are 1000's or above, and 1 of them is a slam. Who was the last guy to play 6 finals in a row?
Ok. 6 finals in a row is crazy achievment. He could won 5 if luck was just a little bit on his side.
But,common it's all about Slams.
As long as Medo never win any GS, all M1000 and crazy form is IF,IF,IF...
I would still prefered Gaudio 2004 season over Medvedev 2019 ANY DAY.
you’re obviously not very sharp but Murray has 3 slamsIf it was all about slams then why do people think Murray was so good??????????
Rublev great right now, but:Rublev is probably the only thing possible keeping him from 7. We'll have to see if it plays out or not and then see the Vienna draw, but he just might go 8 in a row.
And then a bunch after; legendary season.Murray played 7 in a row in 2016: Madrid, Rome, Roland Garros, Queen's, Wimbledon, Rio Olympics, Cincinnati.
And then a bunch after; legendary season.
Bionic Clayray must live.
So does Wawa, yet most people rank Murray as better than him ...who's not very sharp now?you’re obviously not very sharp but Murray has 3 slams
To be fair, Murray reached SF and Finals all the time at slams. He lost to prime/peak Fed, Djoker, and Rafa 18 times at slams from QF on. So Murray had impressive runs in slams.So does Wawa, yet most people rank Murray as better than him ...who's not very sharp now?
So does Wawa, yet most people rank Murray as better than him ...who's not very sharp now?
Go back to OP. "But come on. It's all about slams".And how manu Masters 1000 does Murray have compared to Wawrinka ? How consistent was Murray compared to him ? Titles ? Olympics Gold ? Has Wawrinka even reach world's number 1, heck has even reach 2 ?
You evaluate again your post, Mishter !!!!
Again, Murray has 3 MajorsGo back to OP. "But come on. It's all about slams".
You like to lose don't you?To be fair, Murray reached SF and Finals all the time at slams. He lost to prime/peak Fed, Djoker, and Rafa 18 times at slams from QF on. So Murray had impressive runs in slams.
Med Bear has had one? Against an aging big 3. While this has been an impressive run, it means nothing in the grand scheme if he is not winning slams... and real soon.
Excellent, we're on the same page. So, if it's "all about slams", and Murray and Wawrinka have the same number of slam titles, they have equal careers? Again, referring to OP assertion that it's "all about slams" when claiming that Meds recent accomplishment is over rated, then providing an example where 2 players have the same number of slam titles, but one (due to other accomplishments, perhaps like this run Med is on) had a better career.Again, Murray has 3 Majors
Well I sure don't count moral victories.You like to lose don't you?
3 Slams and 8 extra finals serves as a bit of a testament, no?If it was all about slams then why do people think Murray was so good??????????
If no not atg player had had such a run before, I I believe tht's the case, then it's HUGE.
Yeah, but mury's both overrated and underratedMurray played 7 in a row in 2016: Madrid, Rome, Roland Garros, Queen's, Wimbledon, Rio Olympics, Cincinnati.
I never said I agreed with that statement "all about the Slams ".Excellent, we're on the same page. So, if it's "all about slams", and Murray and Wawrinka have the same number of slam titles, they have equal careers? Again, referring to OP assertion that it's "all about slams" when claiming that Meds recent accomplishment is over rated, then providing an example where 2 players have the same number of slam titles, but one (due to other accomplishments, perhaps like this run Med is on) had a better career.
Repoarted.Yeah, but mury's both overrated and underrated
Since being overrated cancels out being underrated, that means mury doesn't matter
is joke, don't report me
Yeah, but mury's both overrated and underrated
Since being overrated cancels out being underrated, that means mury doesn't matter
is joke, don't report me
So does Wawa, yet most people rank Murray as better than him ...who's not very sharp now?
The extra slam finals alone would put Murray over WawrinkaSo does Wawa, yet most people rank Murray as better than him ...who's not very sharp now?
Lets just say he's got plenty of steaks in the fridge nowYeah but money matters. And making 3 consecutive Masters Finals winning 2 along with USO Final is huge. Outside of Big 3 obviously.
Not overrated, just means very little in the grand scheme if he does not win a slam soon. An early loss at AO? Well...
He won three of them, which is more than 99.9% of all tennis pros, past and present, have ever done.If it was all about slams then why do people think Murray was so good??????????