Dammit. I hate seeing Nadal injured. This really stinks. I won’t even bother watching the final now. As much as I will hate it when Nafsl breaks Fed’s slam record, I hate it even more when Nadal is injured.
This s a big loss for tennis.
Get better soon Rafa.
So if im correct, Nadal will roll into the WTF with a 640 point lead. Gimme the scenarios please!
Multiple, but I can promise you that that WTF will be a carnage. No one will come out of it unscathed. Both Nadal and Djoke will post losses in the group stages and that would favour the Nadal (if he turns up, of course, but I think that he will). The group draws will be crucial. Imagine Feddie boy and Imhotep in one group with everything on the line from the get go!
So if im correct, Nadal will roll into the WTF with a 640 point lead. Gimme the scenarios please!
Only if Djokovic wins. Djokovic could lose and Nadal would have 1040 point lead.
He's not losing to mugavolav lol. Admittedly the weak era is great when your fav is winning, but when things are on the line, and you KNOW the next gen has zero chance, it's like
This is the irony of many of "their" arguments. They have said Rafa or djoker were "tiger" because of "other" reasons, but now it will be about slams? Hmmmm...Why is that ? We have been hearing Fed is not the GOAT even though he has every record imaginable as on date.
Why does the narrative change when Nadal gets the slam record alone ?
Now we should be scared, I first thought of you when he withdrew. Hopefully he will be fine for WTF.He's not losing to mugavolav lol. Admittedly the weak era is great when your fav is winning, but when things are on the line, and you KNOW the next gen has zero chance, it's like
Only for it to heat up again come January.I need this season to hurry up and end so I can move on from this nonsense lol
Only Nadal can get injured while practicing. Oh well, for the second year in a row Djokovic gets the YE#1 for free...
Only for it to heat up again come January.
What is it that you smoke? Are you actually saying Novak will win 9 more GS?Good post.
I think it is pretty obvious that Novak will end up his career with the most slams. By some counts, he could break Margret Court's record and get to 25.
Nadal and Fed would play for 2nd place.
If Nadal is healthy he can try getting over 20. If not , then Fed will be 2nd.
Nadal is right to conserve his health and not play these tournaments since they are meaningless at this point for all the big 3.
1 slam at this point is greater than 10 masters or WTF.
2020 is the swan song for Djokodal imo. Don't see either one winning more than 1 slam post 2020.
Nishikori is the master. He has injured himself brushing his teeth, combing his hair, taking a **** and looking for his car keys.
Abdominal strain? That's not good. Might have just ended his season with that.
Dammit. I hate seeing Nadal injured. This really stinks. I won’t even bother watching the final now. As much as I will hate it when Nafsl breaks Fed’s slam record, I hate it even more when Nadal is injured.
This s a big loss for tennis.
Get better soon Rafa.
What happened? He looked PERFECTLY fine yesterday. Can anybody say what happened?
Ah, the same line told last 10 years...Looked like an injury during the warmup.
If there is any positive to take, better that a shocking piece of luck like this happens in junk time of the season.
Hopefully this gives him the impetus to nix WTF and concentrate on preparing for AO2020.
I don't like the match-up given their Australian Open encounter earlier this year, but if we look at stats from Paris and Stockholm that capture his vein of form....55.5% points won in Paris with 44.4% on return. Stockholm was 57.8% points won with 43.8% return points won, plus a peak Roddick like 74.6% on serve points. I'll be surprised if you don't find his level extremely pleasing, but not sure he matches up well with Djoko. Shapo is definitely in Mad Lad territory entering this match so anything could happen.
Even grabbing a set would be huge for me. Shapo just plays to error prone, but if he is locked on and Djoker is not playing his best defense, I could see it happening. I do see Shapo electing to play very slim margins and very offensive on every shot tomorrow.I don't like the match-up given their Australian Open encounter earlier this year, but if we look at stats from Paris and Stockholm that capture his vein of form....55.5% points won in Paris with 44.4% on return. Stockholm was 57.8% points won with 43.8% return points won, plus a peak Roddick like 74.6% on serve points. I'll be surprised if you don't find his level extremely pleasing, but not sure he matches up well with Djoko. Shapo is definitely in Mad Lad territory entering this match so anything could happen.
I think the Colonel will beat him severely if he breaks down and does that. He needs to open Nole up like a can of worms hitting quality shot after quality shot. Let sickly Nole try to shorten the points.Even grabbing a set would be huge for me. Shapo just plays to error prone, but if he is locked on and Djoker is not playing his best defense, I could see it happening. I do see Shapo electing to play very slim margins and very offensive on every shot tomorrow.
I just don't see Shapo being able to defend long enough to challenge Djoker.I think the Colonel will beat him severely if he breaks down and does that. He needs to open Nole up like a can of worms hitting quality shot after quality shot. Let sickly Nole try to shorten the points.
Sounds like he got what he wanted from the tourney though, confidence without losing and playing good tennis. Could play to his advantage rather than losing to Djoker.
I just don't see Shapo being able to defend long enough to challenge Djoker.
What is it that you smoke? Are you actually saying Novak will win 9 more GS?
Andreescu? Awesome. Raonic and Bouchard? Big letdown from what we thought was coming. FAA and Shapo? We shall see, but fun and exciting for now, but we have been tricked before.Andreescu, Rao, Shapo, Bouchard and FAA!
Why not? He won last 4 of the 6 slams. The 2 he missed were one loss in 5th set because of bad weather. The second with injury and Stanimal in the UsOpen.
He has 4-5 years of prime tennis left. Who will challenge him except Medvedev? Nadal's body is breaking and I won't be surprised if Nadal retires before Fed. Fed meanwhile can NEVER beat Novak at slams.
So conservatively: 5 years: 2 slams each year: Total slams: 26
5 years: 2 slams each year plus 1-2, three slams years: Total 28.
So 24-28 slams are within reach for Djokovic.
I am not getting ahead of myself this time. I remember too well what happened in the final last year. Lol. Now I know you didn't believe this when Mad Lad clawed his way back in the USO final. Mad Lad and Tsits have come on strong this year for parts of it and I think will be tough next year too. Shapovalov does have weapons but he can be erratic. He's struggled with that but just won his 1st title. Djokovic is the favorite but I'm not banking on anything before it happens.
Barring injury, there's no way Djokovic is losing this imo. His level is frightening at the moment.
Shapovalov is an impressive player but a guy like Djokovic is looking at Shapovalov's stroke production and the amount of preparation time he needs on each shot.
Novak will be strategizing to blitz him in rallies and take away the time he needs on each ball.
Shapovalov is left with only two options: Redline out of his comfort zone and risk overhitting or try and play a defensive game against a guy with better stroke mechanics.
Lol no it isn't. He looks more human than I've ever seen him. He has more mental fortitude than these mugs in tight moments and that makes the difference. You can see the cuts starting to show.
Barring injury, there's no way Djokovic is losing this imo. His level is frightening at the moment.
Shapovalov is an impressive player but a guy like Djokovic is looking at Shapovalov's stroke production and the amount of preparation time he needs on each shot.
Novak will be strategizing to blitz him in rallies and take away the time he needs on each ball.
Shapovalov is left with only two options: Redline out of his comfort zone and risk overhitting or try and play a defensive game against a guy with better stroke mechanics.
Will still be a great match to watch, and the impression that I get is that Shapovalov acquiring Youzhny has been one of the best coaching changes of the year. Youzhny has some of the best tennis acumen in the game, and is a good, serious guy in the mould of Ljubicic. He will also help Shapovalov learn to shorten his strokes and develop more improvisation in his game.
Sorry but Nole will wear Shapo down with his boring style, winning by an equally boring scoreline (6-4, 6-3).
Hope I'm proven wrong though. I'd love to see Shapo win a 1000.
Well, got to give it to them Djoker fans, they reach high. If this does happen though, that would mean this is the downfall of tennis. If Djoker can win 12 slams after the age of 32... there is a problem with tennis.
I will be tricked into watching cause he is Canadian, but we all know what will happen. But if Shapo redlines it, maybe. But like @Shaolin said, he is likely to get beat by a defensive and boring Djoker who waits for errors.Lol true. Im def not watching, my time is too precious
Well, got to give it to them Djoker fans, they reach high. If this does happen though, that would mean this is the downfall of tennis. If Djoker can win 12 slams after the age of 32... there is a problem with tennis.
I will be tricked into watching cause he is Canadian, but we all know what will happen. But if Shapo redlines it, maybe. But like @Shaolin said, he is likely to get beat by a defensive and boring Djoker who waits for errors.
Federer unabashedly skips the ENTIRE CLAY SEASON and they don't say anything, claiming Federer deserves it. I still recall the names I was called when I questioned the fact he was given a pass but past players or other professional athletes weren't. I did it out of fairness, not out of hatred of him.
Now Nadal skips a few hc matches for good reasons (unless they can prove him guilty), they have the audacity to question his motives? If Nadal is really purposefully doing it and we talk about mileage, hasn't Nadal been around for long enough to deserve it too?
Federer unabashedly skips the ENTIRE CLAY SEASON and they don't say anything, claiming Federer deserves it. I still recall the names I was called when I questioned the fact he was given a pass but past players or other professional athletes weren't. I did it out of fairness, not out of hatred of him.
Now Nadal skips a few hc matches for good reasons (unless they can prove him guilty), they have the audacity to question his motives? If Nadal is really purposefully doing it and we talk about mileage, hasn't Nadal been around for long enough to deserve it too?
The point I'm making is simple and not directed against anyone: people are self-serving, and so are Fed and Nadal? Why act surprised and cry wolf using double standards?