StrongRule
Talk Tennis Guru
Both have 8 titles. Choose between being 8-0 in finals against having 12 Wimbledon finals but having a 0-3 record against your main rival.
Djokovic. He has been unbeaten there. Fed has been beaten multiple times.
Funny you should mention that, because it has literally no relevance to the discussion.Wimbledon is 10 times more important the aus open
Djokovic. He has been unbeaten there. Fed has been beaten multiple times.
This thread was unnecessary man.This is an invitation for Fed haters/trolls and H2H aficionados.Both have 8 titles. Choose between being 8-0 in finals against having 12 Wimbledon finals but having a 0-3 record against your main rival.
Both have 8 titles. Choose between being 8-0 in finals against having 12 Wimbledon finals but having a 0-3 record against your main rival.
In Federer's defence, he won the title 5 times in a row and reached 6 consecutive finals.Djokovic slightly ahead IMO despite the extra finals for Federer. He is more dominant in Aus than Fed at Wimbledon.
Did you complain about that one though?This thread was unnecessary man.This is an invitation for Fed haters/trolls and H2H aficionados.
off course it has, better be greater in the biggest tournamentFunny you should mention that, because it has literally no relevance to the discussion.
Did you complain about that one though?
Don't worry, this forum still has too much Federer fans, so he will probably win the poll. (though I have a different opinion)
I wasn't on this forum in september 2018, but anyway, this is TTW.Did you complain about that one though?
Don't worry, this forum still has too much Federer fans, so he will probably win the poll. (though I have a different opinion)
Now detractors will value more H2H and no wonder, we already knew that.Titles and number of finals have always been secondary on this forum and the H2H was always glorified.Federer, higher level. Djokovic played six five-setters during his runs (and the last three were disappointing quality); Federer played two. Lost four finals to fitter & clutch(er) greats, three in five sets. No such luck that he could play crap sets and still win.
@SummerBreeze @Tennis_Hands - just to clarify (not being harsh as there may be a language barrier at work here) but being "unbeaten" in this context is referring to Djokovic's unbeaten record in title matches. It's not a claim that Djokovic has never lost a match at AO.
Now detractors will value more H2H and no wonder, we already knew that.Titles and number of finals have always been secondary on this forum and the H2H was always glorified.