And the 107 A.A
Looks like Prince remade two 80's classic style oversized 107 graphite rackets one weighs 12.2 oz & the other 12.9 oz. Wish they make one in 97-100 headsize. I don't understand the manufacturer's (Prince & Wilson) design philosophy back in the 80's, they either make one that is too small (85-90) or too big (107-110) but did not make one in between (97-100).
For example, I had the Wilson Sting 85 & 110 back in the 80's. I love both rackets and I still prefer the feel and control of the classic thin beam design over today's modern design. Even though the 85 was accurate but was unforgiving and the 110 was too big and not too accurate. I really wished that I had a 98 size.
I happened to witness the tennis racket size revolution and used all of the size categories in different eras.
I started playing recreational tennis in high school during 1977. My first racket was a standard size wooden Wilson racket, then a Donnay wooden composite and then a Yamaha fiberglass racket YFG30 & etc; all of them were the tiny and frail standard size rackets which I broke in a matter of months.
Then came the Prince Pro, an all aluminum 110 oversize racket in the late 70's. It was very easy to hit and became a revolution! My brother had that racket for quite a while then he later got the Prince Original Graphite Oversize until today. Seeing the immense success of the Prince Pro (110), many manufacturers started making 110 oversized rackets as an effort to steal the market share. That's when I bought my Wilson Sting 110 around 1980.
After the debut of the oversize rackets, the standard size became obsolete and hence were replaced by midsize rackets. That's when the Wilson Sting Midsize came and I bought that one too. But Wilson never make the thin box beam Midplus version for Sting, they did however manufactured a 95 size much later with a high beam design. For Prince, the midsize 90 graphite came several years after the 110, and the midplus came much later I don't remember the exact timeline.
So in summary the standard size (73?) came first, then the oversize (107-110), then the midsize(85-90), lastly the midplus(93-102).
They are actually very different racquets. The 100P has much higher SW, better stability, power, control and plays a bit firmer than the 100x. The 100P is a real player's frame and is geared towards a stronger player who can handle the 330 SW.Hi, maybe that's an easy one, but could somebody explain me something ? I'm wondering what is the "obvious" difference between prince phantom 100x(305) and prince phantom 100p ... I mean, 5g difference, 5 SW difference, beam a little thiner but same stringing pattern, same head size, same racquet lenght, same balance, they seem very similar to me, is there something that I'm missing please ?
In addition what @t_pac and @tennis347 said, different beams, so they swing a little differently. The rackets are very similar in specs but IMHO suit different playing styles.Hi, maybe that's an easy one, but could somebody explain me something ? I'm wondering what is the "obvious" difference between prince phantom 100x(305) and prince phantom 100p ... I mean, 5g difference, 5 SW difference, beam a little thiner but same stringing pattern, same head size, same racquet lenght, same balance, they seem very similar to me, is there something that I'm missing please ?
Hi, on prince tennis website, both sticks are listed having ATS, and both sticks are listed having textreme+twaron.In addition to the differences you've mentioned (and they are fairly different there) it's a different layup with Twaron added plus Textreme added at 10/2 (ATS).
I do not know if it has been posted before, but this is a nice reviewIs anyone playing with the Prince Phantom O3 100X. I don't see any posting about it.
I just saw that. Unusual stencil, too. Anyone know for sure what the racquet is?Zvonareva got herself a Grand Slam (doubles) title with a Prince stick. Possibly o3 phantom 100x. Hard to tell. About time for her and Prince.
Zvonareva got herself a Grand Slam (doubles) title with a Prince stick. Possibly o3 phantom 100x. Hard to tell. About time for her and Prince.
Looks like the O3...I just saw that. Unusual stencil, too. Anyone know for sure what the racquet is?
Nice match!
The stencils are a Prince stencil with the Solinco stencil below it.I just saw that. Unusual stencil, too. Anyone know for sure what the racquet is?
Nice match!
Really hope the new Tours get a European release soon! Holding off getting more 310g O3s for now...
I do not know if it has been posted before, but this is a nice review
Anyone know anything about the pro stock.TX200P-TK2A/27.5 100. It is on the bay and seems interesting.
Any pros who use the Phantom 93P?
Wowing everyone with your impressive tennis acumen once again. Not that I've looked or anything, but I'd safely assume that any number of pros could use a mid-size frame in the modern game and be successful with it.Can't imagine that they do. It's not really a fit for the modern pro game of defending from behind the baseline until you get the short ball.
Any pros who use the Phantom 93P?
Wowing everyone with your impressive tennis acumen once again. Not that I've looked or anything, but I'd safely assume that any number of pros could use a mid-size frame in the modern game and be successful with it.
Still waiting for you to give us a demonstration of your considerable tennis prowess to validate your baseless BS opinions.
Sorry, how many slams did Roger win with his mids?Even Roger went to a 97 from his 90. Mids are a dying breed. When a pro shows up with a mid on the tour I'll defer to your impressive tennis acumen.
Not sure what my abilities have to do with whether a pro wants to use a mid or not.
Measurement | Phantom 93P (18x20) | Pro Staff RF97 Autograph 2018 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Spin Window (in) | 5.74 | 5.56 | 0.18 |
Measurement | Phantom 93P (18x20) | Blade 98 (18x20) CV | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Spin Window (in) | 5.74 | 5.56 | 0.18 |
Measurement | Phantom 93P (18x20) | Pure Drive 2017 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Spin Window (in) | 5.74 | 5.8 | -0.06 |
Measurement | Phantom 93P (18x20) | Graphene 360 Speed Pro | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Spin Window (in) | 5.74 | 5.77 | -0.03 |
Measurement | Phantom 93P (18x20) | Pro Tour 2.0 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Spin Window (in) | 5.74 | 5.67 | 0.07 |
Measurement | Phantom 93P (18x20) | Textreme Tour 100 (310) (2019) | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Spin Window (in) | 5.74 | 5.76 | -0.02 |
Applause for your application of science.The 93P has a wide face and a thin beam. It's not a shank monster. If you are going to shank with it, you are going to shank with just about any frame that isn't an oversized.
The spin window is bigger than the RF97
Measurement Phantom 93P (18x20) Pro Staff RF97 Autograph 2018 Difference Spin Window (in) 5.74 5.56 0.18
Bigger than the Blade 98
Measurement Phantom 93P (18x20) Blade 98 (18x20) CV Difference Spin Window (in) 5.74 5.56 0.18
Just a tiny, tiny bit smaller (.06" - 1.5mm) than the Pure Drive.
Measurement Phantom 93P (18x20) Pure Drive 2017 Difference Spin Window (in) 5.74 5.8 -0.06
Even less of a difference (.03") to the Speed Pro
Measurement Phantom 93P (18x20) Graphene 360 Speed Pro Difference Spin Window (in) 5.74 5.77 -0.03
Tiny bit bigger than the Pro Tour 2.0
Measurement Phantom 93P (18x20) Pro Tour 2.0 Difference Spin Window (in) 5.74 5.67 0.07
And pretty much identical to the Prince Textreme Tour 100s
Measurement Phantom 93P (18x20) Textreme Tour 100 (310) (2019) Difference Spin Window (in) 5.74 5.76 -0.02
IMO the 93P 18 x 20 is very underated frame. I think it could be used by a pro with success along with some modifications.
I have not hit with the 93P but have heard that it has a huge sweetspot for a midsize frame and has a hefty swingweight to enhance the plow through which will give you some nice pop on your strokes. Certainly a pro can generate plenty of racquet head speed with modifications to make this a viable stick on the tour. There is so much precision which can't be duplicated by many other players frames.Completely agree. I can use my 93P 18x20 interchangeably with any MP (95 or 98) offering from other manufacturers. I modified mine with a bit of weight at 3 and 9 and 7" above the butt cap, put on an overgrip and I was good to go. The feedback from my hitting partner was that the ball had good weight and good power. It is not the most powerful racquet I have, but it is certainly one of the most precise. What it "lacks" in power, it certainly makes up for in creativity and variety and opens up a whole new facet to one's game.
Sorry, how many slams did Roger win with his mids?
I have not hit with the 93P but have heard that it has a huge sweetspot for a midsize frame and has a hefty swingweight to enhance the plow through which will give you some nice pop on your strokes.
Please post a video. I'd love to see you hitting with the 93P.Different era. Borg won a bunch of slams with a woodie.
And Roger is one of the few remaining all court attackers on the pro tour which is being increasingly dominated by defenders and counter-punchers.
But I'll believe a pro can be as successful with a mid when a pro plays with a mid and is successful. I certainly can play just as well with my 93p as any of my other frames from 100-107. But as has been pointed out, I'm a crappy tennis player. At the highest levels, it's yet to be proven in the 2020's that you can be successful with a mid. I'd personally love to see it.
I'd agree it has a generous sweetspot for a mid but not really "huge". I like it for it's feel and precision. When I play with it, I can move my opponent around and go for tighter windows which makes up for some of the lower power and more demanding contact. So in the end I play as well with it as any stick. In fact it's my go to frame for hard court singles. I just have to tailor my game differently. I'm not going to push with my 93P. I'm going to go to deep corners, get a short ball and come in.
Any word out there on when they are releasing the Phantom Graphite, especially the LB? Anxiously awaiting...
Please post a video. I'd love to see you hitting with the 93P.
With respect to the sweet spot size, I found it to be decent (especially for a 93" head size), but I added Tungsten Tape at 3 and 9 (maybe some at 12 as well - can't check now or remember from the top of my head) and I counter-balanced with weight at 7" above the butt cap. This increased the sweet spot and the TW, improved the racquet on defense, yet still kept the balance and maneuverability of the original setup.
I have heard "late September or early October".
I'm looking forward to the LB as well. I had the Graphite LB and shouldn't have sold them. The Phantom LB specs are pretty much identical to the Graphite LB, but it should be just a little stiffer at the tip - which will be nice. Paint job is super stealth as well. Very classy.
Different era. Borg won a bunch of slams with a woodie.
And Roger is one of the few remaining all court attackers on the pro tour which is being increasingly dominated by defenders and counter-punchers.
But I'll believe a pro can be as successful with a mid when a pro plays with a mid and is successful. I certainly can play just as well with my 93p as any of my other frames from 100-107. But as has been pointed out, I'm a crappy tennis player. At the highest levels, it's yet to be proven in the 2020's that you can be successful with a mid. I'd personally love to see it.
He's got a point, but there are players who are successful with smallish headsize rackets. I don't know if we're considering 95's to be mids or MPs, but there's plenty of players who are using older Prestiges, Radicals, and Six.One's on tour and are doing quite well. Many of which would likely do just fine with a 93P; the newer 93P's with the ATS system have sweetspots the size of 97/98's according to TWU. Agreed on what you said in match situations; my favorite headsize for those seems to be 97/98. I can work with a 95 (my CX200 Tour works well for me) or a 100, but when 100s get over 330SW, it gets too demanding on my 1HBH. I really like my Phantom 100P's, but can't gel with them on that shot....tbh idk how Gasquet does it with his extended LM Instinct at 380SW. My Diadem Elevate should be strung soon so hopefully that's the end of racket searching for the immediate future.I don't know, you may have a point. I know for myself, match situations, I need a 97 or a 98 to do my best work (100 just starts being too much torque for my one handed backhand). Still, I'm always surprised to hear how many guys are actually using smaller headsizes. I believe that Cilic uses a 93, not sure who else. According to Tennis Nerd, Djokovic actually uses a 95 along with Medvedev and possibly Rubilev as well.
Specs out on LB?
He's got a point, but there are players who are successful with smallish headsize rackets. I don't know if we're considering 95's to be mids or MPs, but there's plenty of players who are using older Prestiges, Radicals, and Six.One's on tour and are doing quite well. Many of which would likely do just fine with a 93P; the newer 93P's with the ATS system have sweetspots the size of 97/98's according to TWU. Agreed on what you said in match situations; my favorite headsize for those seems to be 97/98. I can work with a 95 (my CX200 Tour works well for me) or a 100, but when 100s get over 330SW, it gets too demanding on my 1HBH. I really like my Phantom 100P's, but can't gel with them on that shot....tbh idk how Gasquet does it with his extended LM Instinct at 380SW. My Diadem Elevate should be strung soon so hopefully that's the end of racket searching for the immediate future.
From the top 20: Djoker uses a 95 PT113B, and Medvedev uses a leaded Dynacore 305 back when they were 95 headsize, but Rublev uses a blacked out Gravity Pro (he's still sponsored by Wilson). RBA has his Six.One, Shapo his SV95, Wawrinka his 95D, and Schwartzman his IG Radical of some type...by the way, can somebody tell me whether the IG radicals were actual 98's or were 95's like the "98" IG and earlier Prestiges?
He's got a point, but there are players who are successful with smallish headsize rackets. I don't know if we're considering 95's to be mids or MPs, but there's plenty of players who are using older Prestiges, Radicals, and Six.One's on tour and are doing quite well. Many of which would likely do just fine with a 93P; the newer 93P's with the ATS system have sweetspots the size of 97/98's according to TWU. Agreed on what you said in match situations; my favorite headsize for those seems to be 97/98. I can work with a 95 (my CX200 Tour works well for me) or a 100, but when 100s get over 330SW, it gets too demanding on my 1HBH. I really like my Phantom 100P's, but can't gel with them on that shot....tbh idk how Gasquet does it with his extended LM Instinct at 380SW. My Diadem Elevate should be strung soon so hopefully that's the end of racket searching for the immediate future.
From the top 20: Djoker uses a 95 PT113B, and Medvedev uses a leaded Dynacore 305 back when they were 95 headsize, but Rublev uses a blacked out Gravity Pro (he's still sponsored by Wilson). RBA has his Six.One, Shapo his SV95, Wawrinka his 95D, and Schwartzman his IG Radical of some type...by the way, can somebody tell me whether the IG radicals were actual 98's or were 95's like the "98" IG and earlier Prestiges?