Hitman
Bionic Poster
Nadal could have six titles there and I'd still pick Fed.
Reasoning? Competition? Court conditions? Something else?
Nadal could have six titles there and I'd still pick Fed.
Reasoning? Competition? Court conditions? Something else?
perhaps but i have been told that nuncle taught him to cast left handed.Federer is better at tennis but I'm sure Nadal is better at the fishing.
Berrettini, Anderson etc...
Berrettini, Anderson etc...
There is a big difference between 'Tennis' and 'THE Tennis' when it comes to Nadal
Meme'ing a little but 2017 was an absolute joke...
That is one you do not want to catch.'The Nadal'
legends like butterdatis, gonzo, boderling, *******, mugit made it very difficult for fraud in slams during the strong era.......
I personally would give Nadal the nod if he wins 6, because to me, you cannot control who you play. Rafa played only those that could make it to him. At 5 all though I am still leaning towards Federer.
@vive le beau jeu ! says The Nadal like it is a sSaturday mornng horror movie matinee
Salty Sampras fan alert.
You don't want to get into an argument about competition. Especially not when it comes to a Nadal at the USO.
I'm a Sampras fan, and I rank Sampas over Federer at USO, but rank Federer over Nadal for now.
I rate Sampras ahead too but not because of his competition. It should be assumed that anyone reasonable gives the nod to Federer over Nadal, should go without saying.
Yeah it's not even a worthy debate.Easiest vote I've ever made.
What are arguments for rating Sampras higher?
More finals and probably robbed of a couple by injury too (1994/1999).
Yes, these were my metrics also. I also put in the fact that Sampras was undefeated in the night matches at USO.
Yes, these were my metrics also. I also put in the fact that Sampras was undefeated in the night matches at USO.
Fed was undefeated until 2012 I think?
It's obviously Rafa by a light year. Let's not insult Rafa by comparing him to a bum like Federer.
The question is this: Is Federer in the top 200 ever at the USO. I'm not so sure.
Federer was at his peak in 2017, yet needed baby world #70 Tiafoe to choke badly to allow Federer to win in 5 sets in the first round. In round two, world #101 Youzhny had Federer on the ropes, but then Federer scraped by another 5 set win.
2018: Baby Millman that was clearly hobbled by the 98 degree heat index stomped peak Fed that was fresh as a daisy in round 4. Millman didn't have enough practice in those humid conditions. But his killer talent allowed him to slaughter peak Fed, despite the massive disadvantage there.
The clincher is at the 2013 USO. Peak Fed got destroyed in 3 sets by Robredo, the same Robredo that lost to Nadal 6-0, 6-2, 6-2 in the following round. 2013 was the best version of Federer that I've ever seen, especially at the USO. But Robredo was far too evolved for a zoning Federer.
The only fair thing to due is cancel Fed's 5 consecutive titles at the USO. We also need to cancel Fed's 14 consecutive wins vs the top 10 at the USO, mainly because each one of those opponents tanked their matches to Fed. Each one of those guys was the favorite against Fed, yet was paid off to tank to Fed.
del po 2009
Federer dominated 2000-2009 decade winning 5 in a row in that time. Nadal owned the event 2010-2019 winning 4 titles in 8 attempts in that decade. Who is better? 5 is more than 4. So Federer has to have the vote. Best 3 US Open players are Sampras Federer and Connors with Nadal 4th.i don't want to give any introduction to this thread, we all know how many times they participated in the slam, who they beat and how many titles they won........let us settle this once and for all........who edges out who in this race at the us open and historically who is greater at this fast hardcourt slam?
OP might mean peak level. Say Nadal 2010 v Federer 2004. Djokovic and Murray would be the beat ones to ask. I voted Federer btw.Why is this even a question? 5>4.
Period.
Still Rafa.Nadal vs Djokovic at the USO is a much better debate.
5 is more than 4. 4 is more than 3.Nadal vs Djokovic at the USO is a much better debate.
What is worth discussing is your lack of objectivity.Fed beat more top 10 players en route to his titles and his draws were not easier than Nadal's by any means.Now check Nadal's draw till the final in 2010, and how about 2017 ? That's right, just because he won vs Djokovic in 2010&2013, that doesn't mean his wins were in the strong era and Fed's in the weak era.I forgot that you didn't watched too much tennis before 2008, ahamUS Opens won in Strong Era
Federer: 1
Nadal: 4
Not worth discussing.
I just said that it is a better debate.Still Rafa.
Fed was undefeated until 2012 I think?
Then why did you vote for Nadal in this poll?5 is more than 4. 4 is more than 3.
del po 2009
LOLFed.
Rafa.
Djoker.
Default sets him back a bit.LOL
Djokovic and Nadal are too close overall.
Did i? I should have voted Fed!! How do i change it?Then why did you vote for Nadal in this poll?
Sometimes, the questions are so insane, that I have to go with the most insane answer. If you asked me who's better at boxing, peak Tyson, or my wife, I'd pick my wife.Glad I read this post. I was shocked at seeing your name among the others who had voted for Nadal.