JohanLiebert
Rookie
"Tennis great Gustavo Kuerten says the likes of Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal have an unfair advantage over players from previous generations.
However, Kuerten says Federer and Nadal owe as much to scientific advancement as they do to their undisputed talent, when not comes to measuring their trophy hauls. “The fact is that life is going to change a lot over the next 50 years, and this is a reflection of what is to come,” Kuerten said.
“Nadal and Federer have five or eight years of extra tennis life compared to previous generations. Kuerten points to the fact that the 39-year-old Federer is still competing for grand slam titles and 34-year-old Nadal has just won his 20th.
The 44-year-old Brazilian - a three-time French Open singles champion - suggests that the advancement in areas like medicine and sports science gives the current stars an advantage over the former greats of the game. “They are from a generation that has science at its disposal, they have the physical capacity to do things much better for much longer. And their time is decisive. “If you think about a 15-year career, it’s 50 percent more than a ten-year career. They started before us and will finish later. “Tennis players will play for 20 years and will still be competitive at 40. And that’s when they have to try to play well at 35, at 38."
Link: https://au.sports.yahoo.com/tennis-...r-federer-rafael-nadal-records-043034010.html
I suppose, longevity is going to improve with time. Lendl similarly noted recently that "33 is the new 27". Imagine, Shapovalov and Tsitsipas playing 20 years from now. But even if advancement in medicine is considered, Federer is still the oldest man in the top 130, which is nothing short of extraordinary.
Edit: Noticed another thread that was just posted at: https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/keurten-weighs-in-on-the-debate.682167/
However, Kuerten says Federer and Nadal owe as much to scientific advancement as they do to their undisputed talent, when not comes to measuring their trophy hauls. “The fact is that life is going to change a lot over the next 50 years, and this is a reflection of what is to come,” Kuerten said.
“Nadal and Federer have five or eight years of extra tennis life compared to previous generations. Kuerten points to the fact that the 39-year-old Federer is still competing for grand slam titles and 34-year-old Nadal has just won his 20th.
The 44-year-old Brazilian - a three-time French Open singles champion - suggests that the advancement in areas like medicine and sports science gives the current stars an advantage over the former greats of the game. “They are from a generation that has science at its disposal, they have the physical capacity to do things much better for much longer. And their time is decisive. “If you think about a 15-year career, it’s 50 percent more than a ten-year career. They started before us and will finish later. “Tennis players will play for 20 years and will still be competitive at 40. And that’s when they have to try to play well at 35, at 38."
Link: https://au.sports.yahoo.com/tennis-...r-federer-rafael-nadal-records-043034010.html
I suppose, longevity is going to improve with time. Lendl similarly noted recently that "33 is the new 27". Imagine, Shapovalov and Tsitsipas playing 20 years from now. But even if advancement in medicine is considered, Federer is still the oldest man in the top 130, which is nothing short of extraordinary.
Edit: Noticed another thread that was just posted at: https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/keurten-weighs-in-on-the-debate.682167/