Tennis_Freak99
Legend
Yes cry some moreNope. Shanghai was fast at first, but they slowed it down. Bounce was also ridiculously high by 2008 too.
Got another one?
Yes cry some moreNope. Shanghai was fast at first, but they slowed it down. Bounce was also ridiculously high by 2008 too.
Got another one?
Yes - also on grass which is pretty low and skiddy.
Yes cry some more
10,12,13,14 USO were all relatively slow with good bounce so it’s a moot point.Nope. Shanghai was fast at first, but they slowed it down. Bounce was also ridiculously high by 2008 too.
Got another one?
It really isn't and the bounce is so untrue.LOL .. Are you even serious? I know you're a fan, but to suggest current Wimbledon is low and skiddy is ridiculous.
2017 was not peak and 2014 Djokovic played an average match but Nishikori was GOATingSome versions of Hewitt can beat Djokovic. That guy lost to Nishikori and Chung at his peak lol.
Didn’t peak 2012 Djokovic lose a set to one legged Hewitt at Australian open? Think peak Hewitt can do much better at the US, especially against weaker versions.Versus better versions he is an underdog? USO 2011 Djokovic takes him to the cleaners and tears him a new a$$hole. Understatement of the century.
The problem with Hewitt is that he has no significant weapon to beat Djokovic over a BO5. Even against a mediocre Djokovic.
But then again you are the same guy that was wondering whether 06 Fed was beating 12 Murray, which is a laughable post altogther.
One leg hewitt took a set off peak Djokovic at his best slam. At his best he causes Novak big problems at the US. He lost to Murray and Nishikori LOLPrime Hewitt would even lose to 2017 Djokovic in straights
Djokovic the favourite, but people saying he would destroy Hewitt are equally as ridiculous.LOL all the Fed fans voting for Hewitt... kidding themselves...
didn’t Gilles Simon take Djokovic to 5 sets at AO 2016 before he peaked against Fed and Murray?Didn’t peak 2012 Djokovic lose a set to one legged Hewitt at Australian open? Think peak Hewitt can do much better at the US, especially against weaker versions.
No-ground gamerer with bad knee and bad hip bad back post back surgery mind elsewhere murray brodidn’t Gilles Simon take Djokovic to 5 sets at AO 2016 before he peaked against Fed and Murray?
No need.OP should have made the votes public.
No need.
abmk, tonylg, PilotPete, ThirdServe voted for Hewitt.
Everyone else, the non-delusionals, voted for Djokovic.
Loaded poll bro. Djokovic lost slam matches to murray Nishikori Chung Istomin. Prime Hewitt would have his chances vs a lesser version. Especially 2012 in the hurricane or 2014/2016/2017 for example.No need.
abmk, tonylg, PilotPete, ThirdServe voted for Hewitt.
Everyone else, the non-delusionals, voted for Djokovic.
Loaded poll bro. Djokovic lost slam matches to murray Nishikori Chung Istomin. Prime Hewitt would have his chances vs a lesser version. Especially 2012 in the hurricane or 2014/2016/2017 for example.
2017 Djokovic held 2 slams and was world number 2 bud. This means you’re peak right?The thread title says Prime Djokovic.
Thank goodness, I thought it was just me.The thread title says Prime Djokovic.
2017 Djokovic held 2 slams and was world number 2 bud. This means you’re peak right?
2017 Djokovic held 2 slams and was world number 2 bud. This means you’re peak right?
Read the post. Abmk: Hewitt pummels 10,12,13,14 Djokovic. Maybe prime Hewitt snags one but that’s it.Djokovic the favourite, but people saying he would destroy Hewitt are equally as ridiculous.
I dont know anymore2017 Djokovic held 2 slams and was world number 2 bud. This means you’re peak right?
Roddick def. would.
I voted Hewitt for the memes.No need.
abmk, tonylg, PilotPete, ThirdServe voted for Hewitt.
Everyone else, the non-delusionals, voted for Djokovic.
dafuq2017 Djokovic held 2 slams and was world number 2 bud. This means you’re peak right?
I voted Hewitt for the memes.
Serious reply (which your thread doesn't deserve): Obviously Djokovic, but Djokovic didn't always play prime-level throughout 2011-2016, and Fed didn't always play prime-level throughout 2004-2007 (he was a lot more consistent at keeping a high level though, whereas Djokovic kinda underperformed in 2012-2014).
Please, cut the BS.Maybe if Hewitt actually had some weapons like 2012-13 Murray I could see him posing a threat to non-Peak Djokovic. Even an average Djokovic did almost everything better than prime Hewitt.
dafuq
Thought it was a computer virus?he just loaded lewlogic.exe
Roddick would be passed senselessly at the net. Serve wouldn’t be as effective against the best/2nd best returner of all time.
I see Roddick 03 Hard courts or 04 W beating a non 11/15 Djokovic but that’s it. Post 04 Roddick with a loopy forehand and exploitable backhand isn’t beating Djokovic anywhere in a slam though.
How many times did they play prime v prime? About 0 times.H2H indicates otherwise.
Even an average Djokovic did everything better than prime Hewitt.
Alright so Hewitt doesn’t beat prime Djokovic at USO 10,12, 13, 14, 16? Agreed then.Hewitt was more than capable at the net and rock solid overhead. He approached infinitely better and also battled harder, not needing to cheat when down.
I gave the edge to ******** because on slow high bouncing courts those glaring deficiencies don't matter, but it would give the edge to Hewitt on faster courts.
It’s just Fed fan agenda meant to artificially bolster Fed’s weaker era.Hewitt had 2 M1000s.......
The fact that this is being entertained is laughable.
Djokovic is a better player than Hewitt but nowhere near as mentally strong as Hewitt. Hewitt was beating prime Federer at times before injuries hit. Federer has never spoken of Djokovic in as glowing terms as hewitt.Prime Hewitt beats Djokovic at the USO in 10, 12 final, 13, 14 and 16.
Djokovic not top 3 at the USO achievements wise or level wise.
Deal with it.
Not really as it is about US Open match up. Hewitt thrives in bear put atmospheres. Djokovic does not in generalIt’s just Fed fan agenda meant to artificially bolster Fed’s weaker era.
Djokovic is a better player than Hewitt but nowhere near as mentally strong as Hewitt. Hewitt was beating prime Federer at times before injuries hit. Federer has never spoken of Djokovic in as glowing terms as hewitt.
You are spot on in your analysis. At USO Hewitt would beat Djokovic.
Hewitt got wins over 2003 Federer i think. Past 2003 Hewitt hip had given out.Prime Federer is 2004 onwards. When did he beat prime Federer? He was getting fed bagels by prime Federer in GS finals.
Hewitt got wins over 2003 Federer i think. Past 2003 Hewitt hip had given out.
Federer era was definitely harder than right now. The fact Nadal federer and djokovic are in top 4 still when all are way past their best is a sad indictment on the young players now. Only Thiem is the real deal. He is 27.
He was Wimbledon champ in 2003.He did. But Federer wasn't even #1 to end 2003. Roddick was.
He was Wimbledon champ in 2003.
Close to it definitely.....
His GS results that year were 4R, 1R, W, 4R. Given the difference compared to his 2004-2007 results, can you truly say with a straight face that Federer was in his prime in 2003?