While Nadal and Federer had the luxury to enjoy their decade long years of senior citizenship, Djokovic is coursed to be forever young it seems. Poor Nole, can't catch a break...
Get a blackberry.Lmaooo. This Samsung makes it so hard to type.
Get a blackberry.
This one is underrated because of the extremely poor level Djokovic showed in the final. But before the final he was in great form.Lets not forget Djokovic also had to deal with Del Potro's peak on grass also during that time....the five hour epic semi in 2013.
This one is underrated because of the extremely poor level Djokovic showed in the final. But before the final he was in great form.
Same story with USO 2012 but there, the drop in level wasn’t all his fault. Wind had a bit of a role to play.This one is underrated because of the extremely poor level Djokovic showed in the final. But before the final he was in great form.
Yes, it was very high quality. Though I didn't believe even for a moment that Del Potro can win the match.One of my favorite grass court matches of the last 10 years.
In USO 2012 I didn't think he was a clear favorite though. For once I actually believed Murray has a chance in a slam final.Same story with USO 2012 but there, the drop in level wasn’t all his fault. Wind had a bit of a role to play.
Really? After the absolute demolition job against Delpo, I figured that Slam was Djokovic’s.In USO 2012 I didn't think he was a clear favorite though. For once I actually believed Murray has a chance in a slam final.
He lost the first set 6-2 to Ferrer in the semifinals. I was mad when rain stopped the match. Would be interesting to see how it would continue at the same day.Really? After the absolute demolition job against Delpo, I figured that Slam was Djokovic’s.
2 wins in Djokovic's worst year on the tour = beating him in Wimbledon while still prime.Please remind me what is Djokovic's record against Kyrgios.
Which years weren’t prime/peak?
2019 Federer? Was 1 point away from defeating Nadal/Djokovic b2b... something younger federer could never do.
LOL, Nadal wasn't in his prime after AO 2014. He was coming from his worst clay season since 2004.2 wins in Djokovic's worst year on the tour = beating him in Wimbledon while still prime.
it's nice to see that you are not one of those people who rush as soon as a new product is released, try to buy a new phone (for example) as soon as possible, who are subject to a universal influence on their brain, and who love and appreciate what they really like, and not what's really fashionable at the moment (especially this tendency is strongly traced among admirers of the iphoneI had a few of them but that was like 12 years ago. Lol. I'm not buying another Samsung though.
They weren’t prime years, but they played prime/peak tennis at those tournaments.None of the years were prime/peak except Nadal in 2011.
His prime ended after Wimbledon 2014, when he got injured before the USO season.LOL, Nadal wasn't in his prime after AO 2014. He was coming from his worst clay season since 2004.
it's nice to see that you are not one of those people who rush as soon as a new product is released, try to buy a new phone as soon as possible, who are subject to a universal influence on their brain, and who love and appreciate what they really like, and not what's really fashionable at the moment (especially this tendency is strongly traced among admirers of the iphone
BB Key2 LE... telling you.Yea I'm not really someone who will go with what everybody is buying just because it's popular and the "in" thing. I was a big HTC fan and I loved their phones, bought like 3 or 4 of them, but then they went basically went under unfortunately. So when I was going to get a new, I didn't see any phones I liked and didn't want to spend $1000 for another phone when I would have to get another in 2 years, since they never last, so I bought a cheaper Samsung. Not the worst phone I've had but not among the best either.
Yes, it was very high quality. Though I didn't believe even for a moment that Del Potro can win the match.
But I understand why Djokovic fans don't talk about it much. It is very hard to take when you fail to win the title after a great win.
BB Key2 LE... telling you.
LOL, Nadal wasn't in his prime after AO 2014. He was coming from his worst clay season since 2004.
Love it. Then again I have only ever had a PKB.Are they any good? I heard BB was trying to make a comeback but I haven't really looked at their phones.
No. Nadal's prime clearly ended after the injury in AO 2014. Nadal who lost to Ferrer and Almagro on clay, should have lost to Nishikori and Andujar and also struggled against players like Simon and Youzhny was anything but prime. Nothing close to that happened to him in any year between 2005-2013. His level on clay in 2014 was way closer to 2015 than to his prime. And even though he somehow won RG 2014, it was clearly his least impressive slam win. His level at Wimbledon was at most decent, nothing more.His prime ended after Wimbledon 2014, when he got injured before the USO season.
2014 Wimbledon was very much a decent level from him for 3 rounds and just got outplayed by Kyrgios.
Physically he was still in his prime. And if 2018/2019 is post-prime, no reason to think 2014 wasn't still prime.
No version of Djokovic except for 2016-2017 loses to that Kyrgios in Wimbledon. 2019 would be close, but he still did well pre-final.
They weren’t prime years, but they played prime/peak tennis at those tournaments.
Are they any good? I heard BB was trying to make a comeback but I haven't really looked at their phones.
You won't be hearing from the OP for a little while by the looks of things....
2014 RG was better than any Slam win he got during 2017-2020 (bar FO 17), arguably better than RG 2006 and RG 2013, but on par at the very least.No. Nadal's prime clearly ended after the injury in AO 2014. Nadal who lost to Ferrer and Almagro on clay, should have lost to Nishikori and Andujar and also struggled against players like Simon and Youzhny was anything but prime. Nothing close to that happened to him in any year between 2005-2013. His level on clay in 2014 was way closer to 2015 than to his prime. And even though he somehow won RG 2014, it was clearly his least impressive slam win. His level at Wimbledon was at most decent, nothing more.
Don't get the comparison with 2018-2019. I rate these two years higher than 2014 for Nadal.
Please remind me what Nadal's record is against Dustin BrownPlease remind me what is Djokovic's record against Kyrgios.
Based on what? For me it is clearly his worst slam win. He actually had cramps during the fourth set in the final, so physically he was also far from his best. And the comparison with RG 2006/2013 is not even worth a discussion.2014 RG was better than any Slam win he got during 2017-2020 (bar FO 17), arguably better than RG 2006 and RG 2013, but on par at the very least.
As for rating 2018 Nadal ahead 2014 at Wimbledon, I am talking about physical capabilities, not level. The fact that he underperformed is another story, but that was no 2015 Nadal who showed up in Wimbledon either.(2015 being a year his game and physical ability were down)
Frankly, except for confidance, I am not even sure how much better Nadal was during Wimbledon 2019-2019, but I guess it's kind of pointless to discuss given he crashed out early in 2014.
I mean Nadal faced Fed 3 times in his prime and Djokovic twice in his prime (18 was a prime performance) in 5 of his 6 best runs. It's tough to argue against Nadal having it tougher. He also is kinda to blame for that himself with his injuries and 6 straight years of suckitude. He coulda had some more easy draws like he did in 2010 if he was there to capitalize on them.
Look who's back, back againBump
Slander thread on Djokovic but his handle is Novak's greatest ever shotBump
Slander thread on Djokovic but his handle is Novak's greatest ever shot
he lost to both, so that is pretty roughFedr had it the toughest since he played both peakest Grassdal (2008) and peakest Grassovic (2015).
Extremely debatable.Lol. Back ready to rumble I see. You can't let this one go. 2011-2016 is a tougher grass era than 2006-2010. I'm not really sure how you think the opposite.
With 2014 you have a great point. Difficult draw for Djokovic.I'm sorry but going through a sequence of Tsonga, Cilic, Dimitrov and Federer in the final is tougher than playing a lesser draw and playing Federer in the 2008 final. The reason is, playing many tough opponents wear you down where you are less sharp for the last match. I can think of more than one Slam where this worked against Djokovic and he wasn't as great in the final as he was throughout the tournament, and ended up losing.
My ass. Djokovic was lucky to play notorious chokers like Cilic and Dimitrov considering he was playing very mediocre tennis until the F.With 2014 you have a great point. Difficult draw for Djokovic.
I just disagree with the other instances.
2011 over 2006Extremely debatable.
Raye them out of 102011 over 2006
2007 over 2012
2008 over 2013
2009 over 2014 ( closest yes pick )
2015 over 2010
Very close actually.
No.Raye them out of 10