StringSnapper
Hall of Fame
Not pointless in that you get no benefit, pointless in that you could be playing matches instead and will benefit more from that (in terms of becoming a 'better' player => defined as winning more matches).
Why does match play have to be different from drilling? Matches are the drills. Drills can never come close to match play.
Okay in a match I was out played by someone who hit skidding slices, and I couldn't get under them for topspin. So I went to a wall and hit heaps of slices to develop the shots, so I could slice back on my fh and bh.
Aside from having a decent shot (and I'm talking a decent slice here, one that can work under pressure. I'm not talking a technique-fetishized every angle of every moment must be the exact same as Roger Federers slice), there is not much more benefit from doing drills compared to other things.
But outside of that scenario, of literally having no shot / technique, isnt match play the ideal drill? Match play against a decently similar opponent. It gives you a completely balanced rounded tennis improvement.
Unless you know you have one particular glaring weakness holding you back, just play matches.
Actually I really like rallying, which i guess is a drill. But i rallied a lot when i first started and my serve, return and volleys suffered comparatively for it. I still like to rally, but I don't think it will make me a better player the fastest way.
Doubles works serve / return more.
Singles works tactics / groundstrokes/ fitness more.
I guess it depends on how you approach matches. If you go in there choking up and only hitting junk to win vs going in there and trying to play your best tennis. It takes awhile before your best tennis consistently beats junk ballers perhaps which enables you to make the jump. Why I named this over 3.5.
You might say "what about the serve - the most technically difficult shot in tennis". Maybe the serve is worth drilling, but can't you just hit a bunch of serves in a match? If your coach tells you to try something else, is it really going to benefit your overall game, 10 years down the track, if you spent 50% of your time serving buckets of balls and 50% playing matches over 100% of your time playing matches? (Aside from the serve lesson of course)
I'm sure everyone is different, but a lot of people lately here it seems have this combo of perfected technique but losing matches. Just look at Medvedev, world number 2, but world number 1 ugliest technique.
Why does match play have to be different from drilling? Matches are the drills. Drills can never come close to match play.
Okay in a match I was out played by someone who hit skidding slices, and I couldn't get under them for topspin. So I went to a wall and hit heaps of slices to develop the shots, so I could slice back on my fh and bh.
Aside from having a decent shot (and I'm talking a decent slice here, one that can work under pressure. I'm not talking a technique-fetishized every angle of every moment must be the exact same as Roger Federers slice), there is not much more benefit from doing drills compared to other things.
But outside of that scenario, of literally having no shot / technique, isnt match play the ideal drill? Match play against a decently similar opponent. It gives you a completely balanced rounded tennis improvement.
Unless you know you have one particular glaring weakness holding you back, just play matches.
Actually I really like rallying, which i guess is a drill. But i rallied a lot when i first started and my serve, return and volleys suffered comparatively for it. I still like to rally, but I don't think it will make me a better player the fastest way.
Doubles works serve / return more.
Singles works tactics / groundstrokes/ fitness more.
I guess it depends on how you approach matches. If you go in there choking up and only hitting junk to win vs going in there and trying to play your best tennis. It takes awhile before your best tennis consistently beats junk ballers perhaps which enables you to make the jump. Why I named this over 3.5.
You might say "what about the serve - the most technically difficult shot in tennis". Maybe the serve is worth drilling, but can't you just hit a bunch of serves in a match? If your coach tells you to try something else, is it really going to benefit your overall game, 10 years down the track, if you spent 50% of your time serving buckets of balls and 50% playing matches over 100% of your time playing matches? (Aside from the serve lesson of course)
I'm sure everyone is different, but a lot of people lately here it seems have this combo of perfected technique but losing matches. Just look at Medvedev, world number 2, but world number 1 ugliest technique.