Fintft
G.O.A.T.
Today we had my....avatar (well the girl in it) winning a tournament, attacking beautifully and at times drop shotting:
What style do you use?
What style do you use?
Don't get stuck in your waysI'll give you one guess.
You play “undead” or zombie tennis?I'll give you one guess.
Hey now, I didn't give you the "other" optionYou play “undead” or zombie tennis?
You play “undead” or zombie tennis?
I'll give you one guess.
The problem is its possible to play all court tennis and be terrible at it..
Counterpuncher is also called a pusher...Hey where's the pusher option? You gonna exclude 90% of us from your survey.
Pusher, final answer!I'll give you one guess.
Counterpuncher is also called a pusher...
The Four Styles of Tennis Play and Strategies to Beat Them
There are four primary styles of singles play in tennis: aggressive baseliner, serve-and-volleyer, counterpuncher, and all-court player. For each style, I describe the key strategies you can employ to beat them.howtheyplay.com
I'd like to say all court player since I have no aversion to attacking the net on short balls. But I'm mostly aggressive baselining/counterpunching, especially on clay, until I get an opportunity that's too good to pass up.
But there's wasn't an option for "every style" depending on the circumstance.
I TRY to be an all court player, but probably end up being an aggressive baseliner half the time.
I'll give you one guess.
I think my medical training holds me back. The old saying, "one bad anecdote is worth a dozen clinical trials" is a true analogy to a doctors thinking. You always remember the patients that have a bad reaction to your treatment moreso than you remember all the times the treatment worked. So you are constantly on defence in medicine.
Similar in tennis, I'll recall the times I got passed or lobbed on a net approach and forget all the times I put away the volley or the opponent panicked and made an error. That tends to keep me back and only attacking when it's a clear and obvious opportunity.
Don't get stuck in your ways
I change my approach [no pun intended] when my opponent proves he can counter it.
Yeah, but you make it sound easy to turn into an all court player or an aggressive baseliner on the dime lol
I find playing S&V takes more explosive energy /footwork /movement.That's the advantage of S&V: being terrible at it takes less energy.
Similar to me serving and volleying at 30-0, 0-30, 40-0, 0-40...Hey, I never said I was good at plan B, just that I have one.
Just adding the word "volley" means you've at least moved 20 or 30 feet forward, even if that's all you do before shrugging and giving up. You can be a terrible, lazy power baseliner without ever taking a step. Just say, "too good," and racquet clap a lot.I find playing S&V takes more explosive energy /footwork /movement.
You can be a terrible, lazy power baseliner without ever taking a step. Just say, "too good," and racquet clap a lot.
Just adding the word "volley" means you've at least moved 20 or 30 feet forward, even if that's all you do before shrugging and giving up. You can be a terrible, lazy power baseliner without ever taking a step. Just say, "too good," and racquet clap a lot.
I'm the opposite: I forget the lobs and passers and savor that CC half drop volley winner.
Good thing I'm not a doctor.
I find playing S&V takes more explosive energy /footwork /movement.
If you were to plot energy output over time, BLers would have a much steadier graph with lower highs whereas a SnVer would have lower lows but huge spikes.
If you are playing someone not very good - baseliner is way easier energy wise, IMHO. I can't speak for being a great S&V guys play other great guys like a Dustin Brown..
But I suspect S&V guys like playing it - so maybe it feels easier to them - but if we counted steps and heart rate - I'd wager its much much harder. I mean just on the serve alone you have to hustle up on every single one. But if you stay back you can just try to smack your first serve and hopefully get a free point. No hustling behind it needed..
Compare that to baseline play - if you are tall we are talking about only a few steps back and forth. Jeff Salzenstein does some cool demos where he covers like the whole half of the court in 3 steps. But sometimes its only one step!
Maybe the S&V guys are imagining that all baseliners are defensive players - but in reality most points are very short even at the rec level. Lots of the MEP points are short and he is the most famous pusher of all.
Especially if you try to use that low, athletic position and bounce all the time like the pros...I play mostly from the baseline but when I have played net rushing tennis I found it much easier physically than staying back. I have never understood some players saying that SnV style tennis is more tiring than backcourt grinding.
Are your opponents weak or unsincere?Sometimes, my opponent and I don’t even agree on what style I played to beat them…so, who really knows. There are days where I feel like I hit out very well, served big etc. and opponents will make comments like I just outlasted them. There are other days where I feel like struggled with timing, racquet head speed, windy conditions etc. and opponents will say that they have never seen me hit out so freely. I‘ve asked some of my regular opponents what style they think I play and I get every description you can think of - it is like the parable about several blind people describing an elephant.
They are at my level and some of them beat me or play me close - so, they are not all weak. But their perception of what happened on court often seems to vary from mine, maybe because my expectations for my performance might depend on how I grade myself against what I was trying to do tactically and they only see the result of how I played. Some might be insincere just to mess with my head for future matches, but I would think that would be a small minority.Are your opponents weak or unsincere?