Please, answer this question with absolute honesty (*)
Is the Laver Cup an exhibition or not? If not, what is the tournament category it should be assimilated to:
(*): Just in case, sorry if the emphasis of the question offends you.
I wish the courts were a bit faster but other than that it’s a great atmosphere. The crowd there is more into it than at regular non-slam tour events.I just love the event
Unique format, great courts, ideal for the crowd as well as television , team emotions , what is not to like about it ?
Above all it is respect for Laver, Borg and McEnroe
When he kicks the bucket, they'll gold plate his skull and make it the new trophy.The Laver Cup is indeed that....The Laver Cup.
He actually had some of his trophies melted to make the new trophy you see today.
The point is that it looks and feels - fake. Fake team spirit is the worst...I like Laver Cup for the staged tight matches, the fake drama, the fake player reactions. I like that almost all of the matches finish in 3 sets. It's a pure entertainment and great fun, something different from the regular tour that's for sure.
who did Roddick mention as being 5th player on team but he was 4 in the world?
Nice post. I am enjoying it. Loved the Rublev/Schwartzman match.Fake? Perhaps. While the Laver Cup is an exbo, I don't believe it's a typical one where players are paid by "non tennis" entities specifically to entertain a selected clientele, and by extension the public as an afterthought. For example, the Kygrios (sp?) Federer match from a few years ago I believe was an authetic effort on both players to win. It seems to me that the up and comers know this is a great opportunity to play the top players that they may not otherwise get to do so in a typical tournament. The top players get to test their mettle against the popular at the moment up and comers to give the crowd the matchups they would love to see. Now, some players most likely take it more seriously than others, not realizing the long term effect of not being asked back by Fed and the organizers. How big of a deal is that? I suppose it depends on the personality of each player. Federer and the top players have so much clout within tennis circles that positive praise from them could lead to great opportunities outside of the existing tournament structure. Some will see this and play accordingly. Some will see this, not care, and play accordingly (ie for their own reasons and thus may be great or mediocre play, I suppose). Some will see only the short term, surface level benefits and play accordingly.
With the event being named the Laver Cup, I think it typifies Federer's love of tennis and genuine respect for it's history and subsequent humility to it. I've always sensed that it's Federer's hope to simply get great tennis, and concurrent entertainment value for the crowd, sharing a passion he has with hopefully like minded players and people.
Biggest event in tennis. Period.Please, answer this question with absolute honesty (*)
Is the Laver Cup an exhibition or not? If not, what is the tournament category it should be assimilated to?
(*): Just in case, sorry if the emphasis of the question offends you.
Atp cup is boring as hell....Laver cup is exciting.It's the ATP's idea of trying to take away from Davis Cup! The ITF and ATP have been at war for as long as I can remember and each have done things to hurt themselves and the game! I didn't think it could get worse with dueling YEC's back in the 90's (GS CUP a joke)! After all the whinging about long seasons, Federer of all people created this glorified exhibition called the Laver Cup! I've watched a few points here and there, but I can't take it seriously! The ATP Cup was interesting last year when Novak led Serbia to the Cup, but the dynamics were different with Nadal and Med challenging Novak at the end!
Yeah I’m sure the organizers sat down and said lets stage team Europe leading team World 11-1 after day two.I like Laver Cup for the staged tight matches, the fake drama, the fake player reactions. I like that almost all of the matches finish in 3 sets. It's a pure entertainment and great fun, something different from the regular tour that's for sure.
Yeah I’m sure the organizers sat down and said lets stage team Europe leading team World 11-1 after day two.
Sorry. I need to go back to the Srsh thread. I might answer to you later, probably never.Biggest event in tennis. Period.
Well, I'm sure it'll be around at least as long as Roger is. Likely post-playing he'll only put more effort into it, not less. If people keep attending, and it keeps making money then every reason to assume it'll flourish, and someone will pick it up when he's gone. The key, I guess, is that people need to care about the players involved to at least some degree. I don't suppose the old folks can sustain it all that long.Ryder Cup has been around for over 40 years. Who knows if Laver Cup will last that long but they get people to show up and the crowds are into it. I’ve been watching the Ryder Cup this week as well and so far it’s been quite boring. The European team is completely out of sorts, playing like crap. The score after a day and a half is 9 - 3 USA leading. And team USA usually performs best in the Sunday singles so this could be a complete blowout. At least the Laver Cup matches yesterday were competitive and a couple could have gone either way.
Aka the WWE of tennis.
In the end i see it as a cash grab only.
It's WWE kind show of Tennis.
MN No. 1 fan of the WWE Laver Cup.The ATP cup is just a.......
When he kicks the bucket, they'll gold plate his skull and make it the new trophy.
I knew i would attract some kind of WWE meme.The ATP cup is just a.......
A poor man’s new format Davis Cup.What is the ATP Cup?
What's higher than a slam?
broSnoop Dogg
That fake, really?it's tennis version of All Star weekend like in NBA, MLB etc
Fed’s 401K?It's Fed's retirement plan: a super exhibition masqurading as a major event.
So would a Russian golfer not get to play in the Ryder Cup? Anyway many of the Laver Cup matches were interesting. There were several that team World could/should have won. It was closer than the scoreline indicates.A cheap knockoff of the Ryder Cup. If it was meant to be serious and a real important tournament, they’d consider Russia part of Team World. Then maybe things would be interesting
I do not think that anybody doubts the quality of the matches, most were quite fierce and good. I think it is the whole 'team spirit' thing, when we all know some of them do not stand each other and were quite vocal in critisizing each other (i.e. Zverev/Tsistipas). It all looks staged to me. Someone mentioned Davis cup and compared the two - the difference is that in Davis cup they play for their countries, so patriotic effect comes in. In the Laver cup?I don't know why people are so desperate to bring it down by constantly reminding us of the fact that it's an exho. Most fans here do know that it is an exho but enjoy it for what it is nevertheless. The bigger problem lies in the imbalance of the teams.