S&V-not_dead_yet
Talk Tennis Guru
Brent Abel and Jeff Jacklich over at "Gold Ball Hunting" talk about the concept of "extending the match": when you're losing, when things are not going your way, when things feel "off", the best response is to try and extend the match. Lose more slowly. Switch to Plan B. Whatever you want to call it.
I also happen to think that most rec players ride waves of winning and losing points which mostly isn't in their control [ie I'm winning because my opponent hit a lull, not because I'm playing well]. So by extending the match, I increase the chance that I'll hit one of those good patches. I could end up turning things around and possibly even win not due to some miraculous improvement in my game but merely because I held out long enough.
I think the people who believe in this concept accept that there is a certain amount of randomness in a reasonably close match [it won't matter when the matchup is lopsided]. Extending the match is a way of trying to harness that randomness in some manner.
Thoughts?
I also happen to think that most rec players ride waves of winning and losing points which mostly isn't in their control [ie I'm winning because my opponent hit a lull, not because I'm playing well]. So by extending the match, I increase the chance that I'll hit one of those good patches. I could end up turning things around and possibly even win not due to some miraculous improvement in my game but merely because I held out long enough.
I think the people who believe in this concept accept that there is a certain amount of randomness in a reasonably close match [it won't matter when the matchup is lopsided]. Extending the match is a way of trying to harness that randomness in some manner.
Thoughts?