Service Ace
Hall of Fame
Aha... Especially when one of them is not allowed to play
He could have played if he wasn't an idiot. He made his bed.
Any Fed/Djoko fans here that actually want Nadal to win AO 2022?
- Thread starter GhostOfNKDM
- Start date
-
- Tags
- nadal
He could have played if he wasn't an idiot. He made his bed.
Service Ace
Hall of Fame
Nah, in that case Safin would be the GOAT. Anyone who is logical acknowledges Slams as the ultimate barometer.
DSH
Talk Tennis Guru
MichaelNadal
Bionic Poster
Cmon Team Fedovic, let's all eat together for once
DSH
Talk Tennis Guru
Nadal is not going to lose against a limited player like Berrettini.
Take it for granted!
DSH
Talk Tennis Guru
Djokovic has won 12 hardcourt Majors, one more than Federer, although it is a small difference, for me that has been enough to surpass the Swiss on that surface as the best.I want Nadal to win this AO, then I want Fed to win this years USO to cement his HC GOAThood. He already is, but another USO would distance himself from the pretender who took advantage of his old age.
And at 41, I doubt Federer can even win more than two matches at Flushing Meadows.
Incognito
Legend
I’d take that anytime. He deserves another FO. Federer is the only player of this generation that I believe has more talent than Nadal and should not be below novaxx in majors count.
DSH
Talk Tennis Guru
For this reason, Djokovic has already surpassed Federer in the most important metric, which is why your statement does not make sense.
Mivic
Hall of Fame
It's one thing for Nadal to win this tournament after he supported the unlawful deportation of the best player on the planet who's won the last three editions of the event. It's another thing entirely for him to win this tournament playing at a standard which would constitute the lowest slam winning level in the past 20 years at a minimum on top of the above. After seeing his level today, I simply wouldn't be able to stomach seeing him vulture this one.
Last edited:
DSH
Talk Tennis Guru
Well if that's your definition of being the best hard court player it could be, but for me the Australian Open is just as important as the US Open, so, the total number of titles of both tournaments should be the definitive metric to define who of all is the best player in history on that surface.You can’t be HC GOAT when you have at least 4 people ahead of you in the biggest HC tournament of all, the USO.
Last edited:
Incognito
Legend
Well if that's your definition of being the best hard court player it could be, but for me the Australian Open is just as important as the US Open so the total number of titles of both tournaments should be the definitive metric to define who of all is the best player in history on that surface.
I see it more like you have the FO, then you have Monte Carlos.
Like Fed has 5 FO but the djoke has 9 monte Carlos
DSH
Talk Tennis Guru
You can't compare a Masters 1000 like Monte Carlo with a Grand Slam event like the Australian Open, please!I see it more like you have the FO, then you have Monte Carlos.
Like Fed has 5 FO but the djoke has 9 monte Carlos
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Poll
- Poll
- Poll
