I thought this was a very interesting post by The Truth in another Thread:
You can add Coria and Gaudio to that list as they have both had mental breakdowns.(which probably explains how federer even got to a french open final)
You can also factor in the sameness of all the surfaces to explain his year round dominance.
Clay is much much faster, grass is waaaaaaay slower.
Any thoughts?
I'm just thinkning about this because, as with Sampras, all people are going to see when they look at federer in the last couple of years of his career is a guy with a weak backhand, over reliant on his serve and forehand, and not noticably more incredible than the rest of the field, and the commments will come that, ''federer wouldn't be top 20 if he played today etc...)
The Truth said:Yes, I am. Check out his contemporaries who all left at the same time and the newbies he was gifted with. Now throw in all the mind influence of the commentators and voila! What healthy grand slam winners did Federer compete with during his reign?
Safin-knee injury, considered quitting
Hewitt-Chicken pox, never got back to form
Ferrero-See Hewitt
Roddick-Once his serve was exposed no longer a true threat to the field
Guga-surgeries
Haas-three surgeries
Canas-gone for several years due to trumped up charges
Nalbandian-in and out, who previously owned him
the rest of the field are newbies, five to seven years younger than Fed who are/were gaining experience.
Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, Berdych, Gasquet, and others.
So who or what was Federer reigning over? A decapitated field. Simple as that
Now, three players are playing good tennis and Fed is in a crisis? Oh wait, mono, and even some of his staunchest fans are jumping ship. Where is the magic in that? I ain't the one smoking, dude!
You can add Coria and Gaudio to that list as they have both had mental breakdowns.(which probably explains how federer even got to a french open final)
You can also factor in the sameness of all the surfaces to explain his year round dominance.
Clay is much much faster, grass is waaaaaaay slower.
Any thoughts?
I'm just thinkning about this because, as with Sampras, all people are going to see when they look at federer in the last couple of years of his career is a guy with a weak backhand, over reliant on his serve and forehand, and not noticably more incredible than the rest of the field, and the commments will come that, ''federer wouldn't be top 20 if he played today etc...)