Alright correction. Protect the top players of the games health. Also to allow them to play more tournaments.I have a hard time believing the change was in order to protect the players' health. Out of 64 players in the draw, only 2 would be affected by a long match in the finals.
Alright correction. Protect the top players of the games health. Also to allow them to play more tournaments.
Take a look at 70's.
All great event best of 5.
Nobody protects those players, great players.
Today everybody have so many problems to just play and shut the moyh.
It was a great idea. I think the slams should do the same in the early rounds. It is not good for the players health to be extended in such long matches.
It was a great idea. I think the slams should do the same in the early rounds. It is not good for the players health to be extended in such long matches.
It was a great idea. I think the slams should do the same in the early rounds. It is not good for the players health to be extended in such long matches.
It was a great idea. I think the slams should do the same in the early rounds. It is not good for the players health to be extended in such long matches.
Sure and some of the top guys were on nonperformance enhancing drugs; and training off court was very limited.
So what are we to conclude that tenns has changed quite a bit from the 70's I hope. Whether its a better game is a different issue, but its a much more physical game. The strings and racquets benefit players who swing virtually as hard as they can on nearly every shot. The wood racquet era didnt allow that.
They didnt want guys from pulling out of the next weeks events.
Look at Rome//Hamburg for many years.