I mean Nadal just wins everything, boring as hell isn't it.
This is definitely a case of the pot calling the kettle. Fed is by far more boring to watch and the rest of the season is on hardcourts and Fed has been dominating that time of the year.
Except that Federer is actually a nice person.
I mean Nadal just wins everything, boring as hell isn't it.
Nadal is possibly even nicer and doesn't give excuses. So look for another reason outside of him beating your boy.
I mean Fed just wins everything, 5 years in a row? Boring as hell isn't it?
How about wanting to win at all costs, even if it involves cheating of any kind. Anything to give him an edge.
Not on clay he doesn't.
OK, what kind of cheating? Huh? I would like to see how you're going to put your foot in your mouth on this one.
How about time wasting, intimidation tactics, delaying the server on big points, general stalling as much as possible.
The time wasting is within the rules. What does Nadal do to intimidate outside of getting every ball back?
I mean Nadal just wins everything, boring as hell isn't it.
I guess that would make you American. Yes wanting to win at all costs is a bad thing.
Actually it's not, he regularly goes over the 20 second limit and the only reason he gets away with it is because he's the number 2 player in the world. If he was a nobody he'd be getting defaulted left, right and center.
I mean Nadal just wins everything, boring as hell isn't it.
It IS boring that Nadal is winning everything...now i know how some ppl felt when Federer was winning everything./
It IS boring that Nadal is winning everything...now i know how some ppl felt when Federer was winning everything./
If Roger knew you were his fan he'd quit tennis
CLay season is boring for me just cause it is such a slow surface and the style of play that goes with it is a snoozefest to me.
Except that Federer is actually a nice person.
I mean Nadal just wins everything, boring as hell isn't it.
The 'grass season'? Seriously?
Too bad they did indeed. But I've been rash on American players because of their cocky attitudes with their "sense" of entitlement whenever they step on court. I've been harsh on Joker, but with good reason. I'm sure you have been as well, if not you most likely hide under a different handle to do that in. I'll praise and bash the guys who deserve to be. Fed deserves kudos for staying alive and then going all the way to the final while guys like Joker deserved to be bashed for that "bailout", his parents should be told to shut up for future matches. But don't single me out because you have losers like ninman and grimjack who deserved to be critisized much more. I told you to don't worry about me, I ignore you and you still come after me like an obsession. I told you to leave me alone and yet here you are.
What part of that are you misinterpreting? Obviously Fed is the one winning the grass season all the time. So I guess in ninman's logic that would be boring. Oh wait. It's not Nadal winning so he doesn't find it boring.
Too bad you feel this way. I think clay and grass are beautiful. Organic surfaces are far more interesting. I guess you're a Roddick/Blake fan and enjoy watching big serves, ball-crushing tennis but not much else? To me, that is boring.
I mean Nadal just wins everything, boring as hell isn't it.
Too bad you feel this way. I think clay and grass are beautiful. Organic surfaces are far more interesting. I guess you're a Roddick/Blake fan and enjoy watching big serves, ball-crushing tennis but not much else? To me, that is boring.
I agree 100%!I agree sillymonkey
well said
Tennis needs more grass tournaments, like it used to be.Too bad you feel this way. I think clay and grass are beautiful. Organic surfaces are far more interesting. I guess you're a Roddick/Blake fan and enjoy watching big serves, ball-crushing tennis but not much else? To me, that is boring.
CLay season is boring for me just cause it is such a slow surface and the style of play that goes with it is a snoozefest to me.
I mean Nadal just wins everything, boring as hell isn't it.
Just to be fair, you've got the week of Queens and Halle. Then the week of Hertogenbosch and Nottingham. Two weeks of Wimbledon and then don't forget about Newport.
Oh yes, Hertogenbosch, Nottingham, and Newport. Well the first two occur the week before Wimbledon, so nobody worth a damn plays them.
And Newport... I think they started growing soybeans on those courts.
Not a fan of Roddick or Blake. Neither have the head of a top 10 player. I prefer variety rather than your Nadal style of heavy topspin shots of 30ball rallys. I much prefer finesse which 'real' grass allows. I like seeing players aggressive at getting to the net, serve and volley, chip and charge etc. Sadly that doesn't exist anymore and fast hard courts or indoor carpet is the closest you can get to it. And watching Nadal and Federer play on clay is not one of my favorite matchups as all Nadal does is loop it to Federer's one handed backhand and he struggles to do much with the ball as it is so high. Yes I know I am exaggerating but this really is the plan A of Nadal on every match I have seen the 2 play on clay and I see little deviation of Nadal from it and Federer's desperateness to try to un around it and hit a forehand. Seeing so many high margin for error shots do so much damage is uninteresting to me. I like to see pace and finesse outdoing opponents not a ridiculous amount of top spin that a player can get to but not do much with. I also like seeing the classic rallys where players hit down the line, crosscourt etc. Predictability is not so enjoyable for me and Nadal is very predictable in strategy.Too bad you feel this way. I think clay and grass are beautiful. Organic surfaces are far more interesting. I guess you're a Roddick/Blake fan and enjoy watching big serves, ball-crushing tennis but not much else? To me, that is boring.