the Artist
Rookie
http://www.australianopen.com/en_AU/news/articles/2009-01-21/200901211232524245312.html
This match promises some classic tennis
This match promises some classic tennis
"What does it mean: "star"?" he [Safin] once said. "There is no explanation for a star. A star is in the sky, and that's it.
"I'm living my life; I'm not living the life of anybody else. I want to live my life and I'm enjoying it very much and I'm doing well and I'm playing tennis and I'm having fun and I think I have a great life. At least I made it this way. I've been trying to live this life for a long time, so why I have to change something which is not broken?"
Not as gifted as a linguist/philosopher
Actually, I find his words inspiring. He's comfortable with his career. Tennis is not everything to him. I can only imagine the great times he's had off the court. Looking at the various babes in his box over the years, I'd say he's made some great decisions.
You guys know that Federer is 9-2 against Safin, right?
Good looking, empty headed chicks are a dime a dozen even if you're not a professional tennis player. If you're reasonably good looking/fit and more importantly reasonably successful (i.e have some cash to throw around) you will find plenty of opportunities to be around beautiful women.
This kind of "philosophy" always amazes me.
Ah...you can also "have fun" with the "various babes" after 30 years old, after you've realized your potential...if you really need to "prove something to yourself" in that regard.
I'm not saying to "see nothing but tennis" until you are 35...but you can STILL make some wise decisions and live a "healthy life" since it's your JOB to do so...instead of "having fun" and getting 2 hours sleep before a grand slam match.
There ARE some things in life that are more important than tennis...but getting YET ANOTHER chick in bed with you instead of focusing on an important match is not really my idea of "important thing" worth sacrificing for.
Andrei Pavel drove some 8 and 1/2 hours to Germany and some 6 hours back from Germany when he reached a Quarter final at Roland Garros in 2002, before having to play his quarter final match against Corretja. His reason was that his wife had just had a baby born a bit prematurely and he wanted to be with them even for a couple hours.
He had some 2 hours sleep before his match was supposed to start, but then as far as I remember there was a rain delay and he got to rest a bit more instead of playing against Corretja after that "adventure".
He still lost the match...but that kind of decision I can understand...
Sleeping 2 hours before a match because you have to spend the previous night chasing yet another chick in a club...is not what I call "getting your priorities straight".
You have plenty of time to do that after you've retired from a sport that deems you "old" @ 28-30.
My 2 pence
I'm going have to disagree with you. Beautiful Women > Tennis. Any day of the week. Either you have your priorities wrong, or you're obviously not a man.
You do realize most of their matches were competitive right? And that Safin tanked about 4 of those probably anyways?
+1 great post! I would add that sexual addiction is not a laughing matter (despite what horny teenage boys might think!). People actually get treatment for that. Now I'm not saying that Safin falls into that category of course but compulsive girl chasing is something that can turn out as a handicap in one's life rather than a privilege.Good looking, empty headed chicks are a dime a dozen even if you're not a professional tennis player. If you're reasonably good looking/fit and more importantly reasonably successful (i.e have some cash to throw around) you will find plenty of opportunities to be around beautiful women.
This kind of "philosophy" always amazes me.
Ah...you can also "have fun" with the "various babes" after 30 years old, after you've realized your potential...if you really need to "prove something to yourself" in that regard.
I'm not saying to "see nothing but tennis" until you are 35...but you can STILL make some wise decisions and live a "healthy life" since it's your JOB to do so...instead of "having fun" and getting 2 hours sleep before a grand slam match.
There ARE some things in life that are more important than tennis...but getting YET ANOTHER chick in bed with you instead of focusing on an important match is not really my idea of "important thing" worth sacrificing for.
Andrei Pavel drove some 8 and 1/2 hours to Germany and some 6 hours back from Germany when he reached a Quarter final at Roland Garros in 2002, before having to play his quarter final match against Corretja. His reason was that his wife had just had a baby born a bit prematurely and he wanted to be with them even for a couple hours.
He had some 2 hours sleep before his match was supposed to start, but then as far as I remember there was a rain delay and he got to rest a bit more instead of playing against Corretja after that "adventure".
He still lost the match...but that kind of decision I can understand...
Sleeping 2 hours before a match because you have to spend the previous night chasing yet another chick in a club...is not what I call "getting your priorities straight".
You have plenty of time to do that after you've retired from a sport that deems you "old" @ 28-30.
My 2 pence
You do realize most of their matches were competitive right? And that Safin tanked about 4 of those probably anyways?
I agree. Although Safin has heavy groundstrokes, his movement is poor, that's gonna be a huge handicap vs Fed (although a little less than it would be on grass).Yeah--but what's going to change tonight? Nothing. Federer in straight sets.
Why does Safin not say "yes, i'm going out there and I
ll be playing to win" instead of his assuming that he will lose attitude (see also Wimbledon semi 08). How can he win if he assumes that he will not win?
Nadal is humble, but makes it clear that he plays to win and that has always sent clear messages to the opponent.
Grrr Marat.
I'm with you on that, you're not gonna win with that attitude.Why does Safin not say "yes, i'm going out there and I
ll be playing to win" instead of his assuming that he will lose attitude (see also Wimbledon semi 08). How can he win if he assumes that he will not win?
Nadal is humble, but makes it clear that he plays to win and that has always sent clear messages to the opponent.
Grrr Marat.
Djoko's loss had more to do with Djoko "losing it" than Safin stepping it up. That attitude doesn't work, that's why Safin hasn't won a title since 2005 and hasn't even made a final since 2005 (other than Moscow). Safin is going absolutely nowhere with that attitude of his. I feel sorry that noone in his entourage has been able to make him change it.Marat is putting himself in that "nothing to lose" mindset. If he believes he's going to lose, somehow he wins. I promise you, it works. He's a genius and a mad man at the same time. I mean, he booked a plane already when he saw he was playing Djokovic, and somehow by some miraculous means beat the living crap out of Djokovic.
I'm with you on that, you're not gonna win with that attitude.
Yes but if you're going on court to play Fed, and your name is Safin, you should take heart in having already beaten the guy rather than tell yourself that it's impossible anyway. Safin had such a dejected attitude that Fowler felt the need to pat his arm and anxiously ask "But you're gonna show up for the match tomorrow, right?". I don't think a player's attitude should ever trigger that kind of concern in a journalist. Too much negativity.He said it was impossible to beat Federer on grass unless you are Nadal. Outside of Nadal, who's beaten Federer the past 5 Wimbledons again? Oh yeah, just Nadal.
Yes but if you're going on court to play Fed, and your name is Safin, you should take heart in having already beaten the guy rather than tell yourself that it's impossible anyway. Safin had such a dejected attitude that Fowler felt the need to pat his arm and anxiously ask "But you're gonna show up for the match tomorrow, right?". I don't think a player's attitude should ever trigger that kind of concern in a journalist. Too much negativity.
Yes but if you're going on court to play Fed, and your name is Safin, you should take heart in having already beaten the guy rather than tell yourself that it's impossible anyway. Safin had such a dejected attitude that Fowler felt the need to pat his arm and anxiously ask "But you're gonna show up for the match tomorrow, right?". I don't think a player's attitude should ever trigger that kind of concern in a journalist. Too much negativity.