roddickfan90
Banned
i reckon safin could have dominated today if he played like he did back in 2000. i just want your thoughts to whether safin would beat nadal today if he played like he did against sampras in 2000, thankyou
Sounds about right to me hater.50-50 on hard : HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
50-50 on hard : HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Sounds about right to me hater.
If the Old Safin was that great, he would've won more then 2 slams in his career. What he did to Sampras was impressive but that is just one match. Not the norm for him.No hate about it. Old Safin = murder of nadal on hard courts. No need to get defensive, it's not like your boy doesn't have 3 times the slams safin does.
If the Old Safin was that great, he would've won more then 2 slams in his career. What he did to Sampras was impressive but that is just one match. Not the norm for him.
2008 Nadal was quite nice on HC....so I would say it would be a competitive match up maybe 4 sets.......unless Marat was playing at his best and he would straight set Nadal.
Clay isn't worth mentioning we all know the answer
Indoor again close...problem I see with Safin is that he struggled quite alot with focus and himself to be quite honest even when at his best.....
Where Nadal is highly consistant week in week out!
Nadal plays a totally different way. Hard to know how Safin would be able to handle a player that brings so many balls back.Oh Nadal wouldnt have stood a chance with Safin 00 USO at the AO. It would have been a massacre.
How could Nadal of dealt with this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iR-TkvFWkM&feature=related
Safin at his peak would hammer Nadal on any type of hard or carpet. Nadal would win on clay, but Marat could trouble him. When Marat was peak he played on fast grass, so how can you compare? Nadal won Wimbledon on green clay.
with what, great passing shots imho i dont think nadal is a serve and voley type of player so he wouldnt have to deal with that and nadal is a better serve returner than sampras was, again it would be a 50-50 matchOh Nadal wouldnt have stood a chance with Safin 00 USO at the AO. It would have been a massacre.
How could Nadal of dealt with this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iR-TkvFWkM&feature=related
Oh Nadal wouldnt have stood a chance with Safin 00 USO at the AO. It would have been a massacre.
How could Nadal of dealt with this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iR-TkvFWkM&feature=related
You're right, it would have been 80-20 for Nadal on hard court. I still have no idea why Safin is so overrated on this board just because he played well a couple of times in his career.50-50 on hard : HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Next thing you know, they're gonna tell you that Safin is a "patient" player lol. Safin is a ball basher, Nadal would have outsmarted him like he did Blake twice in 2008.Nadal plays a totally different way. Hard to know how Safin would be able to handle a player that brings so many balls back.
Safin 00 USO could defeat anyone today on Hardcourts with ease. But hes always been an up and down player. If he could have maintained what he did at the USO in 00 and brought it through the whole season, who knows?
You're right, it would have been 80-20 for Nadal on hard court. I still have no idea why Safin is so overrated on this board just because he played well a couple of times in his career.
Nadal would win easily on any surface, no question. Safin had a very easy opponent in his first GS final who was only there because of home country crowd support. Nadal meanwhile defeated someone who can actually hit a shot other than the serve.
This was a completely unbiassed statement actuallyCould you be ANY more biased?
This was a completely unbiassed statement actually
That's just a hillarious post.Nadal would win easily on any surface, no question. Safin had a very easy opponent in his first GS final who was only there because of home country crowd support. Nadal meanwhile defeated someone who can actually hit a shot other than the serve.
Oh Nadal wouldnt have stood a chance with Safin 00 USO at the AO. It would have been a massacre.
How could Nadal of dealt with this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iR-TkvFWkM&feature=related
Oh Nadal wouldnt have stood a chance with Safin 00 USO at the AO. It would have been a massacre.
How could Nadal of dealt with this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iR-TkvFWkM&feature=related
Why did you put a link to that game? If Safin played like that for a match, Nadal would destroy him. All that clip showed was a Safin who couldn't hit a first serve, who was making unforced errors, who had to save 2 breakpoints, and who was capitalizing on terrible approach shots by Sampras. Those types of approaches may have worked in the 90s, but they're just sitting ducks for guys like Safin, Federer, and Nadal. If anything, matches like that showed that serve and volley was coming to an end.
Safin won almost 60% against the best 2nd serve of all time on one of the fastest courts. Of course some approaches of Sampras were bad, but you've got to get the serve back in the first place to win a point, and Safin does that very effectively when he plays well.
As you know, Nadal's favorite serve is the one going to a righthanders backhand, and Safin is tall and has (or had) one of the best two-handers ever.
I think you've got no idea what thath Safin could do to Nadal's 2nd serve... Safin wouldn't net those serve like Federer tends to do.
To beat Nadal on hardcourt you need bruteforce, not a great tactical brain. Monfils showed that very well just before the AO, the gameplan is simple:
Pound Nadal's forehand to get a short, loopy reply and hit the winner off it or get a put-away.
Safin could get short forehands from Nadal from both his forehand and backhand.
Unlike Federer/Monfils/Tsonga who have to run around their backhands, which makes them predictable and vulnerable.
It is simple, it's all about the execution. Monfils did it like that only a few weeks ago.It's easy to say these things when you know that there can never be a match between the 'real' Safin and Nadal. Obviously, all Safin would have to do is pound Nadal's forehand and then hit a winner on the next shot. It would be the easiest thing in the world.
Gimme a break guys. Sampras even at 30 was a better Hardcourt player than Nadal is currently at least Nadal of the USO. When Nadal reaches a USO final then you can talk. Sampras won 5 USO titles and was humiliated in the final of the USO 00. Im not saying Safin could win consistently on HCs. But if he were to bring the game to Nadal or Fed that he did Sampras in the 00 USO final, he DESTROYS Nadal at the USO bottom line. Im not drinking the Nadal HC kool-aid yet. Beating Fed is one thing. Beating Safin who was playing his best tennis ever at the USO 2000 is another story.
Im not even so sure Nadal could handle 05 AO Safin. Its a game of matchups. Safin could deal with Nadal's topspin with his 2 handed BH better than Fed.
So.. Lets see Nadal even reach a USO final first before we can say he would beat USO 2000 Safin.
Nadal at the USO does NOT BEAT Safin of the 2000 USO playing the best tennis of his career. He cant even get by Murray
Jeeze some of you lot are weird...No doubt if 2008 Rafa played Safin of 00 USO final then he would probably loose.
But I bet if they played ten times in 00 Nadal would be at least 6-4 ahead and more likely 7-3....he is just too consistant and focused for Safin.
To try and insult Nadal because he lost to Murray after having a great year is stupid imo especially as he won the olympics on HC and Murray is a top 5 player now....
Im just bringing a degree of reality here. The Nadal flavor-aid is getting too much to handle just because he won one damn HC slam. WHOOPIDTY DOO!! One HC slam isnt some Hall Of Fame accomplishment. He hasnt proved he is an all time great Hardcourt player just because he won ONE HC slam. If he cant handle Murray at the USO, I dont think he is getting even a set off an on fire Safin at the USO 00 who played probably the best tennis hes ever played.
2000 USO Safin Smokes Nadal at the USO.. PERIOD!!!
Reread the original question the OP asked, he asked about the whole year not just one match....thats why people are replying as they are!
Nadal is doing fine and WILL be in the HOF....his career isn't over yet.
He is a very good hardcourt player he has 1 Slam, 1 Olympic and a few masters on HC....
He played a bad match at the USO so what?
You're just hating...Safin/Sampras/Fed/Nadal they are all great in their own way.
Yes.. Nadal should pick up a few wins off Safin circa 00. But not at a HC slam IMO especially the USO.
My problem with Nadal his fanatical fanbase. He wins ONE WIMBELDON and people want to crown his one of the best grass courters ever. He wins ONE AUSTRALIAN and now people want to crown him one of the best HC players ever. It just doesnt work that way. Hes not on Fed or Pete's level yet. Pete dominated Wimby and USO for years and picked up 2 AO's. Fed's dominated the USO, AO, Wimbeldon for years. When Nadal picks up more slams on grass and HC's than he deserves to be in the discussion.
Im just bringing a degree of reality here. The Nadal flavor-aid is getting too much to handle just because he won one damn HC slam. WHOOPIDTY DOO!! One HC slam isnt some Hall Of Fame accomplishment. He hasnt proved he is an all time great Hardcourt player just because he won ONE HC slam. If he cant handle Murray at the USO, I dont think he is getting even a set off an on fire Safin at the USO 00 who played probably the best tennis hes ever played.
2000 USO Safin Smokes Nadal at the USO.. PERIOD!!!
You're not bringing any reality, your speculating, yet again! So, Nadal is a nobody because he only has 1 HC slam, and Safin is a hall of famer because he has 2?
Just because Safin made Sampras look like a club player in that final doesn't mean he would destroy anyone. What happened to those unreturnable 2nd serves of Sampras' anyway?...enlighten us! It's about match ups.
And don't come arguing that Safin will would blast winners off Nadal's serves.
Here's a bit of reality for you... http://www.atpworldtour.com/tennis/...d/default.asp?playernum1=S741&playernum2=S424
You're right, it would have been 80-20 for Nadal on hard court. I still have no idea why Safin is so overrated on this board just because he played well a couple of times in his career.
You're not bringing any reality, your speculating, yet again! So, Nadal is a nobody because he only has 1 HC slam, and Safin is a hall of famer because he has 2?
Just because Safin made Sampras look like a club player in that final doesn't mean he would destroy anyone. What happened to those unreturnable 2nd serves of Sampras' anyway?...enlighten us! It's about match ups.
And don't come arguing that Safin will would blast winners off Nadal's serves.
Here's a bit of reality for you... http://www.atpworldtour.com/tennis/...d/default.asp?playernum1=S741&playernum2=S424