winner of what? Not of titles for sure neither of head to heads vs the top 10...
You do realize that talent != results.
If one person has a better natural feel for the game, and it comes easier for them, that person is generally speaking, more talented.
If someone has a better proclivity or aptitude for tennis, we say that person is the more "talented" tennis player. It's much like intelligence. If someone learns more quickly, figures tngs out more easily, and can think on their feet faster, that person is more 'intelligent.' That doesn't mean that he'll have a more successful career and a better job than someone less intelligent.
Pure talent doesn't exist, just my opinion. There's talent, hard work and mental abilities. You can't separate the 3, they're all needed and all play a part in the final result.
Of course Nadal can volley, I guess you haven't watched many of his matches at W to make such a silly statement.
Yes you can. The most talented player in the world would not win a point if he simply stood there on the court and let balls fly past him. That doesn't do a thing to diminish his ability/potential to play tennis. That's just a critique against his effort and mental fortitude.
Could you potentially claim that effort/mental fortitude is part of 'talent'? Sure, if you want to change the parameters of what most people consider 'talent,' yes. But in isolating "tennis talent," we're talking about how inclined a player towards playing quality tennis. Just like how in isolating IQ or intelligence, we're isolating a person's ability to solve new problems (i.e. fluid intelligence).
I like Djokovic too. I don't see Nadal and Djokovic as being mutually exclusive! I hope we'll have a lot of Djoko-Nadal matches in the future as I find the matchup very entertaining. I still think Djokovic has some progress to make to reach Nadal's current level on other surfaces than hard court.
Again, has nothing to do with talent.