Everyone was talking about how Fed was gonna win all 4 grand slams for like 2-3 years straight. Result? Didn't happen. But the difference is, Nadal doesn't have someone that can consistently beat him right now. So this is a tough one to call.
You're right about that. I guess the only difference is the timing of the USO being at the end of the year, whereas Federer's incomplete slam was apparent in the middle of the year.
So Nadal, assuming he wins the FO and Wimby, will be coming into the USO with more momentum than Federer had going into the FO in his 2004, 2006, and 2007 three-quarters slam years.
That and Nadal's beating his toughest competition consistently, whereas Federer could not beat Nadal on clay when it really mattered (and only really did it once in 2007 in Hamburg).
The hype over Nadal's potential grand slam is a little soon, but is not as unfounded as the hype over Federer's potentials grand slams as the FO is a lock for Nadal and he is the heavy favourite in Wimby. And he's show that he can win a hardcourt GS, even though he exited in the semi's in unusual fashion the year before (lost to tsonga in 2008 AO, but won 2009 AO = lost to murray in 2008 USO, wins 2009 USO?)
If Nadal does go on to win FO and Wimby, and then goes on to meet Fed in the USO final we'll all have to get ready for the ultimate hype in the tennis media as we'll have the brink of history in the final match of the USO; Nadal complete a Grand Slam or Federer matches the Slam Record and wins USO 6 consecutive times.
Makes the year alot more interesting, i'd say!