**Correction
Federer did something and one and a half hours that Novak couldn't in 4 hours, BECAUSE Novak couldn't in 4 hours!!!
Umm... that's what the title means. It means' Novak couldn't do it, and Federer could in less time.
**Correction
Federer did something and one and a half hours that Novak couldn't in 4 hours, BECAUSE Novak couldn't in 4 hours!!!
It doesn`t matter if Federer wins his match or looses it,he will never play a 3 setter in 4 hours.If there is something that Nadal should work in his game is finishing the points faster.
It wasn't even 4 hours yesterday if you count all the excess...
Umm... that's what the title means. It means' Novak couldn't do it, and Federer could in less time.
yea of course there shouldnt be !!! a 4 hours match in a best of 3 set match..
it was definetely an exception..but still what ı think is djokovic could have beat nadal yesterday with a smarter tactic just like roger'S one
I suppose you could say that there's two ways to beat Nadal now... although both require so much effort it's virtually impossible to pull off. The first is Djoker style, have a real solid groundie game and a good service, attack 2nd serve, and be patient, be mentally tough, hang in there, and outgrind Nadal. The second is Fed style, huge serving (as in effectiveness, not speed), mental toughness on saving bp's, be aggressive against serve and when trying to convert bp's, then end points quickly. I suppose the fundamental difference is whether you want to end points quick or drag it out. Both work, it just requires almost superhuman efforts...