Đoković is a good actor.
So OP you think it would have been better if he just stayed there? Djokovic was being a good sportsman, I hate how everyone drops on anything on any of the big players trying to make it sound negative.
It didn't seem forced to me. And he's always hugged his opponents at the net. You're obviously trying to villianize him any way you can... :-?chill out gaiz! i'm just saying it seemed forced...
if you combine it with how he hugs all his opponents at the net lately,
it's obvious he's trying to move away from being the atp clown...
nothing wrong with that, but he's overdoing it a bit
chill out gaiz! i'm just saying it seemed forced...
if you combine it with how he hugs all his opponents at the net lately,
it's obvious he's trying to move away from being the atp clown...
nothing wrong with that, but he's overdoing it a bit
It didn't seem forced to me. And he's always hugged his opponents at the net. You're obviously trying to villianize him any way you can... :-?
It didn't seem forced to me. And he's always hugged his opponents at the net. You're obviously trying to villianize him any way you can... :-?
chill out gaiz! i'm just saying it seemed forced...
if you combine it with how he hugs all his opponents at the net lately,
it's obvious he's trying to move away from being the atp clown...
nothing wrong with that, but he's overdoing it a bit
It didn't seem forced to me. And he's always hugged his opponents at the net. You're obviously trying to villianize him any way you can... :-?
Djokovic can't do nothing good.Can he? 'd you say the same thing if it was Fed?
I know it's not a word but if it was one it would be exactly what you are doing.wtf is villianize?
Djokovic can't do nothing good.Can he? 'd you say the same thing if it was Fed?
I know it's not a word but if it was one it would be exactly what you are doing.
Maybe he wouldn't, but I'm pretty some *******s would.
What do you mean by that? And who are those "*******s" you're referring to?
ROFL. you have no idea what you are talking about do you? Stop with your BS. No one says this stuff because djokovic and nadal beat federer at a GS. Heck, Federer owns both. How many slams does djokovic have? 1. federer? 14. That is obviously not the case.The problem is that both Rafa and Nole have committed the crime of beating Fed at a slam so they will be bashed for this for not allowing Fed to have 20 slams already Wait 'til Murray beats Fed at a slam and he will be bashed like there is no tomorrow.
Murray has been bashed ever since US open 2008 SFThe problem is that both Rafa and Nole have committed the crime of beating Fed at a slam so they will be bashed for this for not allowing Fed to have 20 slams already Wait 'til Murray beats Fed at a slam and he will be bashed like there is no tomorrow.
Murray has been bashed ever since US open 2008 SF
This picture is more apt for this thread.
Fed "owns" Nadal?ROFL. you have no idea what you are talking about do you? Stop with your BS. No one says this stuff because djokovic and nadal beat federer at a GS. Heck, Federer owns both. How many slams does djokovic have? 1. federer? 14. That is obviously not the case.
Murray has been bashed ever since US open 2008 SF
I am talking specifically about the grand slam tally. 14 >6>1Fed "owns" Nadal?
ROFL. you have no idea what you are talking about do you? Stop with your BS. No one says this stuff because djokovic and nadal beat federer at a GS. Heck, Federer owns both. How many slams does djokovic have? 1. federer? 14. That is obviously not the case.
I am talking specifically about the grand slam tally. 14 >6>1
There will be criticism on fed's behalf and praise on Murray's people will say Murray is a warrior and can beat federer at any slam at best of 5 and if he does win Wimbledon then he becomes number 1 then you will have maximo here 24/7 talking about how Murray owns Federer and nadal and how he will dominate tennis for 4 years and so on.....Yeah but the bashing will become unbearable once Murray beats Fed at a slam.....
So? H2H says otherwise. Fed has more slams than anyone on tour but there are players like Rafa and Murray that own him in the H2H...
Yeah. Lets see. Nadal is legit because he has beaten federer at slams and smaller tournaments but Murray is nothing compared to federer at all. If he beats federer at slam then we can talk about this. Murray has bigger troubles to worry such as being able to get past players like verdasco and gonzalez at slams. Federer has 14 slams and nadal has 6 and is already crying about his knees.So? H2H says otherwise. Fed has more slams than anyone on tour but there are players like Rafa and Murray that own him in the H2H...
The same can be said about Fed before he turned 23.At that age Nadal already won 6 slams.I am talking specifically about the grand slam tally. 14 >6>1
Yeah. Lets see. Nadal is legit because he has beaten federer at slams and smaller tournaments but Murray is nothing compared to federer at all. If he beats federer at slam then we can talk about this. Murray has bigger troubles to worry such as being able to get past players like verdasco and gonzalez at slams. Federer has 14 slams and nadal has 6 and is already crying about his knees.
I do think he feels frusterated at times since he feels like he gets little love from the tennis viewing public with the very popular Federer and Nadal always ranked over him, and now the new hyped up British hero Murray on the rise. I think at times it is frusterating to him. It is a shame that I think he got off on the wrong foot in some ways with his crazy parents, and he got unlucky to not take #2 atleast temporarily over either Nadal or Federer and now drops to #4 without ever rising above #3, and he is from a small country with limited tennis history, and then the U.S Open debacle after the Roddick match. I think all this has combined to give him a somewhat unfair public image and not get the public affection and support he deserves.
Djokovic seems like one of the nicest guys, on court at least. He is one of the few that applauds his opponent's good shots.
Many *******s remember his occasional Fed bashing last year, but that is done now, so a little respect now please...
I do think he feels frusterated at times since he feels like he gets little love from the tennis viewing public with the very popular Federer and Nadal always ranked over him, and now the new hyped up British hero Murray on the rise. I think at times it is frusterating to him. It is a shame that I think he got off on the wrong foot in some ways with his crazy parents, and he got unlucky to not take #2 atleast temporarily over either Nadal or Federer and now drops to #4 without ever rising above #3, and he is from a small country with limited tennis history, and then the U.S Open debacle after the Roddick match. I think all this has combined to give him a somewhat unfair public image and not get the public affection and support he deserves.