samprasvsfederer123
Banned
which one owuld you buy and why
Why not go and download both for free?
Better yet, get the Federer-Sampras 2001 4th round match DVD.
Federer shows Sampras who's the REAL King of Grass.
H2H: Federer > Sampras7 Wimbledons > 5 Wimbledons, Sampras is the undisputed grass court GOAT.
Just like you *********s use the H2H argument to claim that Nadal > Federer. OK, I'll play your game. That means that Federer > Sampras. That is indisputable. It's in the books.
H2H: Federer > Sampras
Just like you *********s use the H2H argument to claim that Nadal > Federer. OK, I'll play your game. That means that Federer > Sampras. That is indisputable. It's in the books.
BTW, 8 Wimbledons > 7 Wimbledons because that's how many Federer will have, at least, by the time he's done.
And Federer already has more consecutive grass court wins than Sampras ever had.
i was going to answer ivanisevic-rafter... but i still have the tape !which one owuld you buy and why
How about buying all 7 of Sampras' Wimbledon finals.
Sampras will always be the king of Wimbledon/Grass because no one else will win that many Wimbledons AND be undefeated in Wimbledon finals.
How about buying all 7 of Sampras' Wimbledon finals.
Sampras will always be the king of Wimbledon/Grass because no one else will win that many Wimbledons AND be undefeated in Wimbledon finals.
You're saying Fed will reach, at least, 5 more Wimbledon finals?And you know no one will win so many Wimbledons because? Say, if Fed wins 4 more Wimbys, bringing his totall tally up to 9, but loses another final, making him having lost 2 finals... I'd say he's better than Sampras on grass. 9W2L > 7W0L. There's no argument. Now of course, whether Fed can win so many more Wimbys is the real question.
How about buying all 7 of Sampras' Wimbledon finals.
Sampras will always be the king of Wimbledon/Grass because no one else will win that many Wimbledons AND be undefeated in Wimbledon finals.
Probably down to genuinely weak competition. Nadal has an overall winning record against Federer. I can't remember Sampras ever playing a Wimbledon final against someone with a winning h2h against him. Maybe you can.
thats because sampras was dominating his main rivals
remind me of feds h2h with nadal and murray or even djoko in the last 2 years (when djoko became a top player)
Hello? It's MUCH worse to lose in the 4th round than it is to lose in the final. Just ask anyone who has never made it past the 4th round. Ask Federer if he would have rather lost in the 4th round last year.How about buying all 7 of Sampras' Wimbledon finals.
Sampras will always be the king of Wimbledon/Grass because no one else will win that many Wimbledons AND be undefeated in Wimbledon finals.