Thats a little unfair dont you think? Hes got 27 titles, usually when he is losing finals it is to fantastic players like Federer ,Del Potro
And the same is he should have twice that much or close to it..
27 titles isnt a whole heck of a lot for a 10'er for around a decade now. Thats actually Underachieving. And whos the guy above that mentioned Courier's name? Courier had a short prime/peak and fell just short of 4 titles to Roddick's only 27 and Roddick has been in the top 10 for almost a decade now.
And not to mention Courier has many more slams than Roddick has or will achieve And courier was on top for how long.. Hell Hewitt has been just as successful in titles and has more slams.. And Hewitt was in top form for how long?
Roddick should have more titles and more slams than most of these guys considering his longevity on top.
THATS THE WHOLE POINT!!!!!
But after playing Fed all these times, Roddick should more or less know what to expect. Hes blown a few slam matches that were his against Fed, but again couldnt perform well in the clutch. 2-19 is inexcusable for a top 10'er for a decade.
Give Courier or Hewitt a decade at the top. Both achieve much more