No one cares about wholly subjective "expectations" when all is said and done. In the grand scheme of things, if slam counts are the strongest consideration of a recongnized "great" status, then you have invalidated your Henin with the very same criteria you set for Serena. There's no squirming out of this, MM.
Mother Marjorie never claimed that Queen Justine Henin was one of the greatest tennis players of all-time, like you have Serena Williams, oh no she didn't. What Mother Marjorie said was that this generation was the worst in women's tennis history:
In order to better understand the natural progression of women's tennis, you must first look at its history. From its inception, there has always been some player in every generation of women's tennis to
challenge its predecessors mark on tennis history (exception in the 1940's when Grand Slam play in Europe was suspended due to WWII). The current generation in the WTA has usurped history and has not been able to field a player consistent enough to challenge the historical greats records in the sport of women's tennis:
(1887-1893) Lottie Dodd 5 GS singles titles
(1886-1900) Blanche Bingley 6 GS singles titles
(1903-1914) Dorothea Douglass 7 GS singles titles
(1915-1926) Molla Bjurstedt 8 GS singles titles
(1919-1926) Suzanne Lenglen 8 GS singles titles
(1923-1938) Helen Wills Moody 19 GS singles titles
(1951-1953) Maureen Connolly Brinker 9 GS singles titles*
(*1st calendar year GS in women's tennis history, yes Maureen single-handedly saved this generation)
(1960-1973) Margaret Court 24 GS singles titles*
(*second calendar year GS in women's tennis history)
(1974-1986) Chris Evert 18 GS singles titles
(best winning percentage in Open Era, most consecutive wins on clay in history, record French Open wins)
(1978-1990) Martina Navrátilová 18 GS singles titles
(won most singles titles in women's tennis history, including a record number of Wimbledon titles)
(1987-1999) Steffi Graf 22 GS singles titles*
(*first Golden calendar year GS in women's tennis history, most weeks at number one, first to win all four majors on four different occasions)
(1999-2010) Serena Williams 13 GS singles titles
Mother Marjorie believes there is a direct corrolation between the decline in interest in televised women's tennis since Stefanie Graf's retirement in 1999, and the subsequent inability of the current generation to challenge the accomplishments of their predecessors marks on history:
Let's take a look at arguably the most watched and historic tennis tournament on Earth, Wimbledon (US Nielsen Ratings):
1987 3.95 NBC NAVRATILOVA/GRAF (RU)
1988 4.29 NBC GRAF
1989 4.56 NBC GRAF
1991 4.65 NBC GRAF
1992 4.48 NBC GRAF
1993 3.74 NBC GRAF
1995 3.54 NBC GRAF
1996 2.91 NBC GRAF
1999 3.38 NBC DAVENPORT/GRAF (RU)
2000 4.07 NBC V. WILLIAMS
2001 3.20 NBC V. WILLIAMS
2002 2.71 NBC S. WILLIAMS/V. WILLIAMS RU
2003 2.49 NBC S. WILLIAMS/V. WILLIAMS RU
2004 2.54 NBC SHARAPOVA/S. WILLIAMS RU
2005 2.49 NBC V. WILLIAMS
2007 2.29 NBC V. WILLIAMS
2008 2.64 NBC V. WILLIAMS/S. WILLIAMS RU
2009 S. WILLIAMS/V. WILLIAMS RU
2010 1.6 NBC S. WILLIAMS
Given the improvement in tennis technology, travel, and increased television coverage of tennis, it would appear as though the current generation of women would enjoy better ratings and popularity, but it never culminated.
All of these technological improvements haven't transformed tennis in the way that a glowing tennis star that challenges tennis history could.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK4M1_JQaT4&feature=related
So you ask yourself, "Why would Mother Marjorie say such a thing about any generation of women's tennis players?"
Well, Mother Marjorie notes that not all of the current generation of tennis players are of "tennis shape" which might have something to do with their lack of being able approach their predecessors historical marks. With the exception of players like V. Williams and Queen Justine Henin, some of the others are more athletic but carry so many more pounds. You can't be a big girl and expect to make history in the sport of tennis. Oh, no you cannot.
Mother Marjorie tears-up thinking of how some from this generation have abandoned the challenge of tennis history to walk the red carpet in big girl sizes. Bigger is not always better. No, it is not.
As it stands, if both retired today, allegedly "anemic" Serena--with her particular number of majors is still considered one of the greatest players in history (we have read enough articles and heard commentators repeatedly say this), while Henin--again, by your own standards of judgement--must be a minor footnote.
Again, the difference between Queen Justine and Serena Williams is that Queen Justine exceeded her expectations/potential, while Serena squandered hers in favor of celebrity and outside interests. Not to mention that Queen Justine still holds a winning record against Serena Williams in grand slam singles matches.
Serena's inability to fully commit to the sport of tennis doesn't make her one of the all-time greats. She's simply not. Not when she's won only a handful of tournaments when compared to the greats of the sport, or was ranked number one less than half the time some of her predecessors were, or only finished the year ranked number one on TWO occasions. The numbers aren't there, and you know it. Where are the record-setting performances? What historical marks has she broken when compared to her predecessors?
The more Mother Marjorie thinks about it, the more she's coming to the conclusion that Serena Williams just didn't have the psychological prowess or the tennis physique to approach her predecessors historically. How sad that is. But true.
Mother Marjorie A 2 the nn
Queen of Talk Tennis Warehouse