Ralph's 2010: Not that good, really...

Sid_Vicious

G.O.A.T.
Have you ever heard of sarcasm?
I-dunno-lol1.jpg
 

Speranza

Hall of Fame
Holmes: Hmmm, not sure if it was or wasn't. Either way, seeing Ralph in a thread title makes me smile, still. ;)
 

Nadalfan89

Hall of Fame
Nadal sweeps the entire clay season, wins three grandslams on three different surfaces (consecutively) and his year wasn't good?

Tell me more, *******!
 

Nadalfan89

Hall of Fame
It was good. Just not as good as Federer's 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, when you also factor in the all important W-L.

All those years Federer could barely get a win on clay. He didn't even win one French open in all those years and they were better than Nada's 2010? Yeah okay...
 
All those years Federer could barely get a win on clay. He didn't even win one French open in all those years and they were better than Nada's 2010? Yeah okay...

I believe in those years Federer really only lost to Nadal on clay. Check 2006. Nadal ONLY won FO's in all those years. The only reason he had such great 2008 and 2010 was due to Fed injuries.
 

Nadalfan89

Hall of Fame
I believe in those years Federer really only lost to Nadal on clay. Check 2006. Nadal ONLY won FO's in all those years. The only reason he had such great 2008 and 2010 was due to Fed injuries.

Oh, please enlighten us on what injuries allowed Nadal to sweep three grandslams in a row?
 
Oh, please enlighten us on what injuries allowed Nadal to sweep three grandslams in a row?

Fed had a lung infection at the beginning of the year and leg injury during W10. Rafa won USO10 legitimately however, with a cakewalk draw. We'll see what happens when the law of averages takes over.
 

aphex

Banned
Nadal sweeps the entire clay season, wins three grandslams on three different surfaces (consecutively) and his year wasn't good?

Tell me more, *******!

What do you wanna know Ralphette?

How many players have had years with fewer than 10 losses and a better W/L ratio?
 

Manus Domini

Hall of Fame
All those years Federer could barely get a win on clay. He didn't even win one French open in all those years and they were better than Nada's 2010? Yeah okay...

I'm not saying that Rafa's year wasn't good when I say what I am saying, but bear with me:

Fed's 3 slams and a slam final is better than 3 slams and a non-slam final, especially when Fed could make the finals of RG consecutively for years...
 

ksbh

Banned
ROFL X 2500, V!

See, Roger Federer is a truly unique player ... he can play high level tennis with mono yet when the light diminishes ever so slightly, as it did in the Wimbledon final 2008 against Rafa, he can't play good enough, losing in 5 sets! ROFL!

my friend got mono recently,I'm hoping it's the Roger Federer type where you can play top level tennis and get cured when you win a slam title
 
my friend got mono recently,I'm hoping it's the Roger Federer type where you can play top level tennis and get cured when you win a slam title

Certainly, but the real miracles is having tendonitis that allows you to destroy Hewitt in a Major and then at the same time allows you to use it as an excuse for skipping Wimbledon. Now that's magic!
 

viduka0101

Hall of Fame
ROFL X 2500, V!

See, Roger Federer is a truly unique player ... he can play high level tennis with mono yet when the light diminishes ever so slightly, as it did in the Wimbledon final 2008 against Rafa, he can't play good enough, losing in 5 sets! ROFL!

IMHO they shouldn't have let Rafa wear those night vision goggles, that was just unfair
 

P_Agony

Banned
Oh, please enlighten us on what injuries allowed Nadal to sweep three grandslams in a row?

Well, Nadal's own "injury" at Wimbledon's 3rd round allowed him to win that match. In fact, Nadal should thank the "injuries", or "injury timeouts" I should say. Nadal won many titles BECAUSE he was "injured". The most fake champion of all time.
 

viduka0101

Hall of Fame
Smart? Maybe. But with that he is also fake and a cheater. If you are willing to respect a person like that then have fun. I know I can't.

yeah,everyone knows that,really
you can shut up for a while with that and post something else for a change
 

nadalbestclass

Hall of Fame
I'm not saying that Rafa's year wasn't good when I say what I am saying, but bear with me:

Fed's 3 slams and a slam final is better than 3 slams and a non-slam final, especially when Fed could make the finals of RG consecutively for years...

Where did Fed come in?

Nadal had a great year. He came back from a lot of injury and a really BAD 11 months. To come back in style like that, beats any other numbers. What a true champion.
 

nadalbestclass

Hall of Fame
Well, Nadal's own "injury" at Wimbledon's 3rd round allowed him to win that match. In fact, Nadal should thank the "injuries", or "injury timeouts" I should say. Nadal won many titles BECAUSE he was "injured". The most fake champion of all time.

1) Get over it.

2) LOL at the idea that Nadal would have lost that match. Sorry but Petz's streak was about over when Rafa took his MTO. Result would have been no different.
 

Andres

G.O.A.T.
Well, Nadal's own "injury" at Wimbledon's 3rd round allowed him to win that match. In fact, Nadal should thank the "injuries", or "injury timeouts" I should say. Nadal won many titles BECAUSE he was "injured". The most fake champion of all time.
You remind me of the babe
 

P_Agony

Banned
1) Get over it.

2) LOL at the idea that Nadal would have lost that match. Sorry but Petz's streak was about over when Rafa took his MTO. Result would have been no different.

I love it how all the Nards reply with the likes of "shut up" or "get over it" because obviously they don't have any valid points to add. Anyway, let's focus at the AO, if Nadal wins that he would have completed the "Cheater Slam".
 
Top