And yet, he won three slams in a row. Absolutely top 5 in the open era.
Who cares when the guy is in top-1 of the most humble humans, animals or plants of all time.
I lol at these statements. Have you ever heard of Arthur Ashe?Who cares when the guy is in top-1 of the most humble players of all time.
I lol at these statements. Have you ever heard of Arthur Ashe?
Have you ever heard of sarcasm?
It is very similar to Federer's 2007 record. 68-9 W-L, 3 grand slams, and 8 titles. Nadal just had 1 less title.
And 2007 was not even Feds best !!
71 wins-10 losses
That's probably not even top 5 in the open era...
Worst player in the world yet he shows up in many TW discussions.
Worst player in the world yet he shows up in many TW discussions.
Lot of them started by Fediots... Like this one.
Nadal sweeps the entire clay season, wins three grandslams on three different surfaces (consecutively) and his year wasn't good?
Tell me more, *******!
It was good. Just not as good as Federer's 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, when you also factor in the all important W-L.
All those years Federer could barely get a win on clay. He didn't even win one French open in all those years and they were better than Nada's 2010? Yeah okay...
I believe in those years Federer really only lost to Nadal on clay. Check 2006. Nadal ONLY won FO's in all those years. The only reason he had such great 2008 and 2010 was due to Fed injuries.
Oh, please enlighten us on what injuries allowed Nadal to sweep three grandslams in a row?
I believe the right expression is BOO HOO.Fed had a lung infection at the beginning of the year and leg injury during W10. Rafa won USO10 legitimately however, with a cakewalk draw. We'll see what happens when the law of averages takes over.
I believe the right expression is BOO HOO.
Yes, kinda likeYeah kinda like in 2009 when Rafa skipped out due to "injuries"?
Just because you have fingers it doesn't mean you have to type, as this thread clearly shows.
Nadal sweeps the entire clay season, wins three grandslams on three different surfaces (consecutively) and his year wasn't good?
Tell me more, *******!
Yeah kinda like in 2009 when Rafa skipped out due to "injuries"?
my friend got mono recently,I'm hoping it's the Roger Federer type where you can play top level tennis and get cured when you win a slam title
You mean 9 months later? Yeah, me too.
All those years Federer could barely get a win on clay. He didn't even win one French open in all those years and they were better than Nada's 2010? Yeah okay...
my friend got mono recently,I'm hoping it's the Roger Federer type where you can play top level tennis and get cured when you win a slam title
my friend got mono recently,I'm hoping it's the Roger Federer type where you can play top level tennis and get cured when you win a slam title
And yet, he won three slams in a row. Absolutely top 5 in the open era.
ROFL X 2500, V!
See, Roger Federer is a truly unique player ... he can play high level tennis with mono yet when the light diminishes ever so slightly, as it did in the Wimbledon final 2008 against Rafa, he can't play good enough, losing in 5 sets! ROFL!
Who cares when the guy is in top-1 of the most fake players of all time.
Certainly, but the real miracles is having tendonitis that allows you to destroy Hewitt in a Major and then at the same time allows you to use it as an excuse for skipping Wimbledon. Now that's magic!
Oh, please enlighten us on what injuries allowed Nadal to sweep three grandslams in a row?
Won 2, cheated to win at Wimbledon.
that's called being smart
Smart? Maybe. But with that he is also fake and a cheater. If you are willing to respect a person like that then have fun. I know I can't.
I'm not saying that Rafa's year wasn't good when I say what I am saying, but bear with me:
Fed's 3 slams and a slam final is better than 3 slams and a non-slam final, especially when Fed could make the finals of RG consecutively for years...
Where did Fed come in?
Nadal had a great year. He came back from a lot of injury and a really BAD 11 months. To come back in style like that, beats any other numbers. What a true champion.
Well, Nadal's own "injury" at Wimbledon's 3rd round allowed him to win that match. In fact, Nadal should thank the "injuries", or "injury timeouts" I should say. Nadal won many titles BECAUSE he was "injured". The most fake champion of all time.
yeah,everyone knows that,really
you can shut up for a while with that and post something else for a change
You remind me of the babeWell, Nadal's own "injury" at Wimbledon's 3rd round allowed him to win that match. In fact, Nadal should thank the "injuries", or "injury timeouts" I should say. Nadal won many titles BECAUSE he was "injured". The most fake champion of all time.
1) Get over it.
2) LOL at the idea that Nadal would have lost that match. Sorry but Petz's streak was about over when Rafa took his MTO. Result would have been no different.
You remind me of the babe