C
celoft
Guest
He also could hit double digits at the master series in 2012.
He will have to beat Cvac to do it. He is the only player standing in his way of winning a slam. Maybe Fed as well,so if he can get through both of them he has a shot.
What about Nadal? He lost to Nadal in last 2 grand slams. Fed, Djoker, Nadal are problem for him for important matches. He needs to get over this pressure to win a slam.
Last 3, beat him the French too :/
Murray can beat Nadal in a slam, we know that, but so far he hasn't shown he's capable of overcoming Federer or Djokovic.
His best chances are in the AO and the USO, if he gets a good draw, and can sort his head out, he could make it this year.
What about Nadal? He lost to Nadal in last 2 grand slams. Fed, Djoker, Nadal are problem for him for important matches. He needs to get over this pressure to win a slam.
He's only played Novak and Fed in finals. I have no real way of knowing this but I think he'd put up a better showing against them in an earlier rd (at least be able to take a set).
I think Murray winning Wimbledon would be amazing.
Murray is more than capable of beating Nadal in slams or anywhere else for that matter. He needs to worry about how he will beat Cvac or Fed. He doesn't need to worry about Nadal whatsoever.
What kind of statement is this when Nadal beat him at the last 3 slams straight? If u don't think he has to worry about him, that's your opinion, but adding "whatsoever" to the end made it complete NONSENSE. 2 out of 3 matches, Nadal beats Murray.
No, Nadal, Djokovic and Delpo will dominate with Murray getting to 2 or 3 slam finals.
No, he can't. We've already decided that 2012 will be the year for Nadal to win his YCGS. The golden one because the this year is Olympic.
Where does Murray have better chances? AO or USO?
No, he can't. We've already decided that 2012 will be the year for Nadal to win his YCGS. The golden one because the this year is Olympic.
By the way IMO 2012 will be year when everyone will be convinced that lendy/Andy or whatever murray is not going to win a slam.
From next year onwards Henman hill will be officially renamed as Murray mud at wimbledon.
Sorry andy just focus at playstation. you look very happy over there.
He will have to beat Cvac to do it. He is the only player standing in his way of winning a slam. Maybe Fed as well,so if he can get through both of them he has a shot.
In fact, Murray hasn't even been able to take Rafa to 5 sets in those last 3 slam semis. He matches up a lot better with Djokovic.
Looks like he will then, based on the closeness of his SF at the AO vs Djokovic. Although Nadal has a much bigger mental edge over Murray. Imagine Murray beating Nadal in a GS final :lol: after not being able to beat Nadal in 3 GS semis last year....
Is that so? I've a better idea. How about you stick to playstation rather than boring us all on here with your rather puerile comments!
Murrya can beat Nadal much easier than he can beat Djesus. I don't see Nadal being much of an obstacle this year when they meet. The tables turned in that match-up after Nadal lost badly in the final in Tokyo.
And my comment still stands. Murrya will have to go through Djesus if he wants to win a slam. It still remains to be seen if he can do it or not.
Oh,I would like to ask you just how many accounts you have on this forum,Bullzilla? It's got to be more than a dozen by now. :lol:
as much as I love Murray, I disagree that Novak and Andy are 'almost identical'. Novak is a better player. Better 1st and 2nd serve, MUCH BETTER FH and that's a big deal. Nole covers the court better (although Murray is great too). Djokovic simply is doing everything a bit better than Andy.That should be funny, because that was pretty much the same situation with Djokovic until 2011.
IMO Murray and Djokovic are almost identical, so if Murray somehow overcomes that mental block, he'd be as poor a matchup for Nadal as Djokovic is.
However, if Rafa finds an answer to Djokovic, Rafa can employ virtually the same strategy against Murray.
Looks like a potential win-all or lose-all situation for Rafa.
we might see a tired Nadal and Djoker heading into the USO after the RG/Wimbly/Olympics swing.
That could be advantage Federer as well.
Not in my opinon. This is not 2008. I really don't think Federer is winning a Slam again, even if Djoker and Nadal are tired from Olympics and he draws Lendy in the final. Lendy Murray Version 2012 will not lose 3-0 to Fed in a Slam final again.
Of course this is just my opinion and I could be wrong. Time will tell...
Why are you so much obsessed with murray and i didn't suggest you anything so please don't advice me what should i do.
I'm not obsessed with Murray but I do get irritated when posters like you show him no respect. You felt free to offer him 'advice' about sticking to playstation, why? Would you advise all the other players ranked below him to do the same, the vast majority of whom have never and probably will never come as close to winning a Slam as Murray has?
No-one's asking you to like Murray or expect you to say he will win a Slam, just to treat him with the respect justified by his #4 ranking and achievements to date.
If you can't do that then go and post on another thread about a player you do like!
It is a matter of time before Murray wins a slam. There will be a lot of threads to be bumped and crow to be eaten when that happens
The amount of disrespect I see for Murray EVERYWHERE online is disgusting. I'm not a huge fan but I respect the guy a lot, he has had some great matches/tourneys and just hasn't pulled off a Slam *yet*. Totally believe in him, though. Can't believe some other idiot Delpo fans claiming that Delpo is "real" Top 4 now that he's back. What bull****. Even as a Delpo fan I feel that Murray is the more crafty player and more consistent and has a better overall career so far. Plus, Murray has much more respectable H2H against Feds, ******, Djoker than Delpo does.
Just don't listen to these trolls. Lendy's time is coming.