1. Nadal
2. Ferrer
3. Djokovic
4. Federer (he has lost many matches after having had match points recently, he lost after being 2 sets up vs. Djokovic and Tsonga, also after having being 2 sets to 1 up against Del Potro in a match he should have won and he has a huge mental block against Nadal which makes him choke on BPs)
The rest are mental midgets.
Your no.2 certainly has a great H2H with no.4 on the list which proves his mental strength.
How about the impeccable performances in the finals he has played? He won 14 out of 29.
Your no.2 certainly has a great H2H with no.4 on the list which proves his mental strength.
How about the impeccable performances in the finals he has played? He won 14 out of 29.
Why, you mean that percentage of finals won is relevant to assess mental strength? Without bothering about the opponents? Let's have a look at Ferrer's vanquishers in final:
Before 2007, he lost 3 finals to Andreev, Moya, and Coria. Andreev is not a very fierce player, but he beat Nadal on clay the same year (2005.
After 2007, he lost:
- One masters cup against Federer
- five final against a player named Nadal
- two against a certain Djokovic
- one against Murray, Soderling, and Ferrero
The bigger names he beat in finals are Verdasco, Nalbandian and Almagro.
It seems to me that this resume shows how strong mentally he is to beat inferior opponents, and how limited his game is to beat superior opponents. Anyway, I dont' think his loss can be explained by mental weakness!
lololol
Ferrer over Djokovic/Federer.
Only on TW..
Ferrer after losing the first set 79-199 (28.4%)
Federer after losing the first set 90-134 (40.2%)
Djokovic after losing the first set 56-97 (36.6%)
Like winning important points, controlling their temper, not being streaky during matches.
For me it would be
1. Nadal
2. Ferrer
3. Djokovic
4. Federer
5. Berdych
6. Isner
7. Del Potro
8. Tipsarevic
9. Tsonga
10. Murray
Nadal can't even play tennis without picking his ass before every point. That isn't mental strength.
His mental strength in big points is an illusion anyway. He just pushes and is VERY good at it. You don't need to be calm to implement that style. It's different for shotmakers.
While I agree with your overall point, I disagree with your supporting evidence. The statistic you used does not account for the fact that Fed/Djokovic are overall better/more skilled players so they are expected to win more matches being 1 set down anyway. Federer winning from 1 set down yesterday is more about the fact that his true level is multiple times higher than his opponent than a mental strength thing.
To have an apples to apples comparison, you need to eliminate the gap in skills/talent factor between Ferrer and Djoker/Fed i.e. one way to do it would be to limit the above stat to opponents ranked outside the top 50. That way we know that all these players are 'expected' to win.
Another way would be to look at 5-set records although that then brings in physical fitness as well.
I disagree. That is great statistic to analyze mental prowess on a tennis court. From the large sample sizes we have, recovering from a first set loss statistically favors a loss rather than a win. Even great players like Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic are in 35-40% ranges.
Gap in talent and skill? Federer and Djokovic did not win those matches from a set down with beautiful looking groundstrokes. They played the big points well and won the matches. Mental strength and physical talent are related somewhat , IMO. Federer/Djokovic perform better in bigger matches because they know how good they are and that gives them the confidence to push the odds in their favor.
You say we should eliminate the gap between them in talent... why should we do that? There is no point in looking at mental strength if it does not give you any results. I can say that I am mentally tougher than Federer/Djokovic, but for an apples to apples comparison, you must eliminate the talent gap between me and Federer/Djokovic by comparing my performances against local scrub tennis players to Federer/Djokovic's performances at the grand slam level.
I don't see any reason to give Ferrer extra credit for his mental strength just because he is not as talented as Federer or Djokovic. It just does not make sense to me. It is like saying that we can't reasonably claim that Sampras was mentally tougher than Agassi because Agassi did not have as a great of a serve to rely on during big points; and for a reasonable comparison, we must have the two play a match with underhand serves to truly see who was mentally tougher. :-|
Ferrer has no excuse. In his last two matches against Nadal this year, Ferrer converted 4/25 BP against Nadal. The gap in talent is clearly not an excuse. Ferrer can clearly play his way to break points, but he folds like a cheap lawn chair and loses in straight sets every time.
Even against Federer, I remember matches where Ferrer failed to convert like 6 BP chances. I think it was WTF 2010...
1. Ferrer
2. Nadal
3. Federer
4. Djokovic
5. Del Potro
6. Berdych
7. Isner
8. Tipsarevic
9. Tsonga
10. Murray
Murray is a walking disaster. You don't get where he is without being a total headcase. I've three of his slams against the top players and he's been a disaster in every one of them.
Sorry, you are dead wrong here. Nadal's mental strength is second to none and I say that as a Federer fan.
I am a Federer fan but I have to say in terms of mental strength:
1. Nadal
then there is a gap
2. Federer
3. Djokovic
then another gap
4. Murray
5. Ferrer
and then everybody else after that and you start going into mental midget territory.
Last year though Nadal was terrible because of his 6 losses in a row to djoker has regained it a bit now
Murray #4, dont make me laugh. No way in hell is Murray mentally tougher than Ferrer, he just has a way better game. Ferrer would never play the way Murray has in his slam finals, he might get his ass whooped just as badly but it wouldnt be through playing embarassingly subpar tennis.
No, sorry, but you are wrong. It isn't.
Murray #4, dont make me laugh. No way in hell is Murray mentally tougher than Ferrer, he just has a way better game. Ferrer would never play the way Murray has in his slam finals, he might get his ass whooped just as badly but it wouldnt be through playing embarassingly subpar tennis.
No, sorry, you are wrong.
No, you are.
No, you are.
No, I am
No, you are.
No, sorry, but you are wrong. It isn't.
1. Nadal
2. Isner
3. Ferrer
4. Federer
5. Tipsarevic
6. Del Potro
7. Djokovic
8. Tsonga
9. Berdych
10. Murray
Nadal
Federer
Djokovic
(HUGE GAP)
Del Potro
Murray
(Gap)
Ferrer
Isner
Berdych
Tsonga
Tipsarevic
1. Federer
2. Djokovic
3. Del Potro
4. Nadal
5. Ferrer
6. Murray
7. Tsonga
8. Tipsarevic
9. Isner
10.Berdych
Fed's as tough as they get, 18/19 slam finals not only shows in tournament toughness but for such a long time.
Djokovic has been tougher last year but wasn't long enough.
Del Potro has been tougher but with a diminished game since the injury the confidence is lacking until lately.
Nadal has a high margin for error game with his topspin so he can stay in rallies longer than most, it looks like mental toughness but is really just the safe type of game he has.