CioabaRaul
New User
Did Fed ever show up at the FO?
Must have missed it ....zzzzzzzzzzzz
You must be 15 or less
Did Fed ever show up at the FO?
Must have missed it ....zzzzzzzzzzzz
honest to god i have no idea how this guy is not permabanned yet!!!
Patient enough then TDK will show his true face...
True to my words. Posts #32, 37, and 38. Your own words, ...or mine, TDK?
Hypocrite, liar, and flip-flopper of the worst kind, and the list goes on.
So the FO where Fed beat Soderling, and your beloved Rafa lost to that weakling Soderling? Still gave you ulcers, didn't it? Is it 2009 to now? Wow, 3 years? A VERY LONG TIME to suffer, and as long as record books exist, these ulcers never stop, you know. Pity!
Now I kinda of understand why you kept referring to that FO in other threads. Pity on your soul (or more on your stomach).
People troll with you for the sake of having a good time. Absolutely no problem about it. However your slip-of-tongue comments about player's wife/girlfriend, pathetic arguments for your defense including the appeal to the 1st constitutional right, just show what a loser you truly are.
As I said, who gives a rat's ass about your Fed bashing arguments. You had all the time cooking them in your dark basement. Just like a politician well-rehearsed speech. Where the ugly snake head of yours reared up its hideous head was when you slipped. Yup, like"have both in bed with me, same fantasy like the majority of this board, just a guy, so what, no biggie..."
2 words: PATHETIC LOSER. And I may add:FO 2009
All of Fedal's slams pre-djokovic were boring.
You must be 15 or less
Rearing up your ugly head again, huh?I think you should change your name fro Vphuck to ImaPhuck.
I think sports illustrated would disagree.....
2008 Wimbledon labeled greatest match of all time .
Rearing up your ugly head again, huh?
Gotta hurt when your true name got called out!
I see another priceless thread of yours "Nadal and Graf" today. Wow. Nevertheless, gotta wonder with so many younger female tennis players, why Graf?
Oh, these dark recesses of your fantasy?!!!
Keep on going though. Enlighten us more with your dazzling mind and knowledge.
Uraphuc
...
Thanks but FO 2009 with Fed as a winner still stands, boring or not. Arghhh, these ulcers will just not go away, will they not?
Yup, but I'm NOT the one propping up thread after thread to bash Fed.2008 Wimbledon .... Ouch.... U r Vphucked
Anything that Rafa didn't win, especially when Fed was the winner, is boring.Nadal's presence as a pro has concurred with every single slam that Roger has ever won. Rafa went pro in 2001. Fed won his first slam in 2003. Nadal had been playing as a pro for two years alreeady before Roger won his first slam. So, how can any of Federer's slams have been "pre-Nadal?"
Anything that Rafa didn't win, especially when Fed was the winner, is boring.
Hope that I'm wrong.
Your thoughts, TDK?
Anything that Rafa didn't win, especially when Fed was the winner, is boring.
Hope that I'm wrong.
Your thoughts, TDK?
Nadal's presence as a pro has concurred with every single slam that Roger has ever won. Rafa went pro in 2001. Fed won his first slam in 2003. Nadal had been playing as a pro for two years alreeady before Roger won his first slam. So, how can any of Federer's slams have been "pre-Nadal?"
There we go again with the "5-set-or crap" argument.Shall I go on......usually you need at 5 sets or a tiebreaker or something to make things exciting.
But Feds slams.....no competiton
There we go again with the "5-set-or crap" argument.
Not enough to start a thread and trolling everyone for X # of pages, you propped this one up and morphed it in the continuity of the other one.
There is Fed hate and there is TDK, isn't it?
Still ulcerating over that FO 2009. Stop watching the re-run and the ulcers will go away, trust me.
Someone suggested you to go away, train for some challengers since you're worn out your welcome here. Please don't let me be the one to say it.
OP, I think you've worn out your welcome with the TW poasters. Perhaps you should consider taking a break, and playing some ATP challengers in Florida and Europe? I heard they pay good cash, and as a cherry on top of the sundae, cause a lot of mourning and sadness due to your absence.
I suggest you strongly consider it.
You think three sets in a grand slam are more exciting than 5 sets??
All the most exciting slams were five sets...
Nadal Federer 2007 2008
Joker nadal AO 2012
For you, 'exciting' means only when Rafa was the winner. Regardless of how long the match lasted. It could be one shot for that matter.
Sorry, perhaps it has to be to infinity since Rafa is a beast and no one can outlast him. Yup, I forgot that one.
Hey, be a tennis fan instead of a sick, twisted guy.
Grow up and grow out of your fantasies, would you?
Contradicting the title of your own thread? Borg-McEnroe 1st Wimby, not pre-Rafa?Actually Phuck,
I said the second most exciting match I've ever seem was Federer Nadal Wimbledon 2007 .....in fact here's my personal list of most exciting matches
1- 2008 Wimbledon
2- 2007 Wimbledon
3- Borg McEnroe the first Wimbledon
3- 2012 Joker Nadal AO
Contradicting the title of your own thread? Borg-McEnroe 1st Wimby, not pre-Rafa?
Weaving too much and you get lost in your own twisted logic, huh?
And why boring? Right, right, the weak era, no Djoker, Rafa hasn't developed yet, only lucky pretenders against Fed, perhaps Fed won in all 3-4 sets and not the >6 hr marathon as AO12...
All to say in your eyes, Fed achievements are simply pure luck. Yup, one lucky bast*** indeed.
Show us the pic of your time machine. The one you will use to right all the wrong done to your beloved Rafa
You didn't even watch borg x mcenroe. I could bet my house and my car on that.
That list shows that you haven't watched tennis before 2008. There are soo many better matches, for both quality and drama, depending on what poison you want.
Actually Phuck,
I said the second most exciting match I've ever seem was Federer Nadal Wimbledon 2007 .....in fact here's my personal list of most exciting matches
1- 2008 Wimbledon
2- 2007 Wimbledon
3- Borg McEnroe the first Wimbledon
3- 2012 Joker Nadal AO
Pre Nadal days doesn't signal the Pre Djokovic days, when it actually became interesting, and Nadal had to started earning slams against a player who could actually give him competition.
Pre Nadal days, and Nadal days but Pre Djokovic are just are horrendous and void of any competition.
You seem like a guy that relishes good competition. You should be thrilled that Novak is here to entertain you, and make Nadal earn slams for a change.
You should be thankful that Djokovic turned up to the party, if you seek competition and depth. If no Djokovic, Nadal wins slam after slam after slam for two years straight.
What is so exciting about two guys grinding for 6 hours, when it could've have been easily been 4 at the most without time wasting?
You didn't think Borg Mcenroe was exciting?
Nadal would be on 14 majors now if Djesus hadn't made an appearance. Grrrrr :evil:
Yeah but Nadal is lucky....joker will force Rafa to improve his game.
Yes, in other ways it's more satisfying to see how Nadal has responded to the challenge in 2012 so far. He's come out fighting, big time. The Australian Open final was crucial, even though Nadal lost in the end.
Its still boring really.. Who outside the top 3 are still even capable of winning a slam? ROFL
Post #17 and post #18 (your own words):"Was there tennis from 2003-2006? I must have missed it ."Phuck,
I said all of Feds slams pre "Nadal".....where the contradiction ?
Nadal would be on 14 majors now if Djesus hadn't made an appearance. Grrrrr :evil:
And Federer would be on 20+ if not for Nadal
3>1
...It was the same with Borg McEnroe connors
Nadal would be on 14 majors now if Djesus hadn't made an appearance. Grrrrr :evil:
oh ok so you would rather be a butt picker and an idiot who groans and moans and has no good speaking skills rather than a multi-lingual classy, elegant athelete who makes way more and is the face of tennis?? Oh ok that makes senseOk phuk,
I'm sorry. I had said that 11 slams is greater than 16 the same way as I would rather be with Rafas girlfriend even though there is more of Mirka.
I apologize .....I was thinking about it and I would now like to change my statement.....
I'd rather be with Rafas girl friend 11 times than Be with Mirka 16 times.
Ok? Peace?
Roger would have been on 18 slams if not for Djokovic. I mean who else could have taken possibly the AO 2008 and AO 2011?
Also, it's not a given that Roger would have lost to Rafa in US Open 2011..
oh ok so you would rather be a butt picker and an idiot who groans and moans and has no good speaking skills rather than a multi-lingual classy, elegant athelete who makes way more and is the face of tennis?? Oh ok that makes sense
You're going to be kicked out of Rafa's church, and the kicker will be none other than TDK. You're warned, my friend!
Wear good padding
oh ok so you would rather be a butt picker and an idiot who groans and moans and has no good speaking skills rather than a multi-lingual classy, elegant athelete who makes way more and is the face of tennis?? Oh ok that makes sense