Fugazi
Professional
Indeed, ZeroSkid is manic on these boards since Fed won Wimby...Poor you! Your man's non-performance at Wimbledon vs Fed's stellar achievements is really discombobulating you - lol
Indeed, ZeroSkid is manic on these boards since Fed won Wimby...Poor you! Your man's non-performance at Wimbledon vs Fed's stellar achievements is really discombobulating you - lol
Indeed, ZeroSkid is manic on these boards since Fed won Wimby...
That would not change because Nads would never give Feds the chance to change it by "loosing" early... Ala USO
Fed 4:0 Nadal indoors
2011 ATP World Tour Finals (6-3, 6-0)
2010 ATP World Tour Finals (6-3, 3-6, 6-1)
2007 Tennis Masters Cup (6-4, 6-1)
2006 Tennis Masters Cup (6-4, 7-5)
Nuff said.
Fed 4:0 Nadal indoors
2011 ATP World Tour Finals (6-3, 6-0)
2010 ATP World Tour Finals (6-3, 3-6, 6-1)
2007 Tennis Masters Cup (6-4, 6-1)
2006 Tennis Masters Cup (6-4, 7-5)
Nuff said.
The wtf is only a little below at grand slam and we know nadal really wants to win it, and he is 0-4 agaist federer in it.
I honestly think Nadal was more concerned with the Davis Cup final than the World Tour Finals last year.
I'd give Nadal a 55/45 chance of winning.
The indoor conditions will work to Federer's advantage, but we all know how much of a knack he has for losing to Nadal in Grand Slams.
It's 8-2, but it should be 9-2 come US Open.
Come on. I thought that everybody knew that h2h of Nadal/Federer is uneven because the majority of encounters was on Nadal's favorite surface and almost none on Federer's favorite.
Do you think that if they faced 10 times in Cinci/Toronto/US Open Nadal would have won more than 2 times?
hows about the other years? hows about 2010 when he had won everything and got to the finals of every important tournament that year, including WTF?
thats understating it a bit but yes, true.Nadal went all out for the title in 2010. Wasn't quite good enough and lost to Federer, and had an extremely close match with Murray in the semi finals.
there you go applying logic and reason again.
thats understating it a bit but yes, true.
Nadal leads Federer 8-2 in majors, 3-2 on non-clay surfaces.}
It is not understating it at all. Nadal was at 1 set all in the final. That's close.
wasnt the question what would happen indoors?
0-4 indoors is telling.
Federer leads Nadal head-to-head in their non-clay matches, yet Nadal has still won most of the big ones. 2-0 at the Australian Open, for example.
AO still favors nadal greatly with the slow court and high bounce.
lets examine their head to head at cincinnatti, WTF and USO
all those mean nothing when it is a 5 set grand slam match, but I just thought i might add that rafa has won the beijing gold medal for singles which was played on a very fast surface, but not Federer.
Nadal leads Federer 8-2 in majors, 3-2 on non-clay surfaces.
3-2 on Non-Clay, ok, but 2 on slow high-boucing surface of Australian Open that favors A LOT Nadal's game and you know that.
Come on. The last meeting of the two in WTF (wich isn't even that fast as cinci, for example) Federer BAGLED Nadal.
Come on, this is ludicrous. Some Federer fans don't want to count clay, yet don't want to count some hardcourts either. Why count anything?
Is so hard to admit that Nadal failed to go trough and meet Federer in his best surfaces (indoor and fast hard courts)?
How many times they've encountered on Paris, Cinci, Canada Masters or US Open?
Is so hard to admit that Nadal failed to go trough and meet Federer in his best surfaces (indoor and fast hard courts)?
How many times they've encountered on Paris, Cinci, Canada Masters or US Open?
Nadal has beaten Federer 8 times in majors at 3 different venues. There's no getting around that, if you're honest. As for the US Open, it's Federer who has blown match points in semi finals against Djokovic in the previous 2 years.
ok, but where was rafa 05-09.
be looking forward to the showdown between rafa and roger at bercy again.
Is it true that Nadal was bagled in that final?Is this the tournament where Federer didn't past the quarter finals until 2011 while Nadal was in the 2007 final?
Is this the tournament where Federer didn't past the quarter finals until 2011 while Nadal was in the 2007 final?
If there was an indoor grand slam would nadal still dominate Federer? I would say definitely, when it comes to the big events nadal has that extra gear to beat Federer, regardless of the surface.
If there was an indoor grand slam would nadal still dominate Federer? I would say definitely, when it comes to the big events nadal has that extra gear to beat Federer, regardless of the surface.
That's exactly why Nadal always easily beats Federer at that 5th most prestigious event of the year, the WTF.
That's gona change this year this year,dudeski
I still waiting for the awnser.
That's exactly why Nadal always easily beats Federer at that 5th most prestigious event of the year, the WTF.
you mean the olympics :lol:
you mean the olympics :lol:
you mean the olympics :lol:
That's gona change this year this year,dudeski
you mean the olympics :lol:
I gotta hand it to you...you have put in work since the wimby final.
its like you have taken up the mantle where NSK, the dark knight, analysis king and all the other minor rafa ****s have left off.
cheers.