Who are the best Freshman coming in next year?

tennisnoob3

Professional
If you look closer you will see almost 1/2 of those are 5 star wins are over younger players (graduate in 2012 and 2013) and yes, he played a few players 2 or 3 times. Same in blue chip wins - 1/2 over younger bc's. The guy couldn't win a level 1. Ya gotta look at the whole story. That is one of the things that seems off with TR - a player can get a great ranking beating 5 stars and blue chips younger than them. They say they compensate for it but it doesn't seem as scientific as it should be. He's a decent player, but missing a lot for the college game. When you don't learn how to balance school with tournament travel college is tougher than for those that have.

i cant.

whats his usta national rank?
 

ClarkC

Hall of Fame
If you look closer you will see almost 1/2 of those are 5 star wins are over younger players (graduate in 2012 and 2013) and yes, he played a few players 2 or 3 times. Same in blue chip wins - 1/2 over younger bc's. The guy couldn't win a level 1. Ya gotta look at the whole story. That is one of the things that seems off with TR - a player can get a great ranking beating 5 stars and blue chips younger than them. They say they compensate for it but it doesn't seem as scientific as it should be.

I don't think you know how the ranking system works. Search the threads here for more explanations. All matches count, but there is also a weighting of your top 8 wins. If Stineman's top 8 wins included wins over 5 star recruits who are younger than he, then he would not be a high blue chip. It looks to me like Stineman's top 8 wins include 1 win over an older blue chip (Bernstein), 4 wins over blue chips his age (2 over Wyatt McCoy, 1 each over Hunter Reese and Hunter Callahan), and the other three top 8 wins would be over younger blue chips or same-age 5 stars, depending on who is higher in the absolute rankings that we don't see.

With a 22-0 record against 5 stars, and undefeated also against 4/3/2 stars, he looks like he should be ranked as a high blue chip.

But, you could always name someone who is below him who should be above him. That would help us evaluate the TRN rankings.
 

bfactor61

Semi-Pro
what about John Morrissey? reached a career high of 30 in the world. For stanford morrissey is sneaking under the radar as a stud
 

treeman10

Semi-Pro
I hear working for dad is long term plan so college not important, I think tennis may be fading quickly in terms of priority.
 

Fedace

Banned
what about John Morrissey? reached a career high of 30 in the world. For stanford morrissey is sneaking under the radar as a stud

That is higher than Donald Young. He could carry the team to the championships this year. With Klahn at #1, championships could be a Lock.
 
That is higher than Donald Young. He could carry the team to the championships this year. With Klahn at #1, championships could be a Lock.

Being ranked 30 in juniors is not higher than being ranked 1 unless you meant numerically higher, then yes, 30 is higher than 1.
 

tennis_tater

Semi-Pro
Texas A&M adds Joshua Ward-Hibbert. He will be a solid top 6 player for the Aggies. The Aggies look to be pretty strong next season.

I don't know who is coming back from this year's team other than Junior Ore, who I believe will be a junior, but aTm already had a top 5 recruiting class this year with a number of American blue-chips already signed. Add in Ward-Hibbert, who won the boy's aussie open doubles this year, and aTm should be primed to contend for an SEC Championship in their first year in the league next season.
 

tennis_tater

Semi-Pro
There are tools called "search engines" that can help with this kind of information.

I know about search engines. If you read my post, you will see I wasn't asking anyone to provide the information I stated I didn't know. I was simply making an observation in my post that with their current recruiting class alone, which consists of two American top 10 players for this year's class, plus a top ITF world junior player, to go along with Junior Ore (who was also a top American/highly ranked ITF junior) and whoever else they may have returning, they will be one of the top teams in their new conference next season. That's all I was saying. I didn't say anyone was unexpectedly leaving the team and I didn't ask anyone to provide me any tidbit of information that could be found through a simple google search.
 

SoCal10s

Hall of Fame
if you want a real assessment of freshmen ,TRN will not provide you with it.. maybe on the women's side but you need to look at those international players coming in.. IE: USC got a handfull of freshmen last year and the 2 that was a factor were Quiroz and Hanfmann,the other 3 are all super players and would have made some impact on any other team ,but USC was just too deep this year.. look for Peter Smith to recruit more international players to fill in for Johnson and Nguyen ,which won't register at TRN... Stanford always get the best rated ,but it's been too long since they made any waves at the national title ..
 

tennis_tater

Semi-Pro
I don't know who is coming back from this year's team other than Junior Ore, who I believe will be a junior, but aTm already had a top 5 recruiting class this year with a number of American blue-chips already signed. Add in Ward-Hibbert, who won the boy's aussie open doubles this year, and aTm should be primed to contend for an SEC Championship in their first year in the league next season.

I read Clemson Tigers post about Kruguer possibly going pro, but if they can keep ward-hibbert (orange bowl and aussie open dubs winner) and vincent, they should still be loaded with recruits from last 2 classes. From a & m article:

The 2011-12 recruiting class joins the likes of Blue Chip Aggie recruits such as sophomore Junior Ore who was ranked as high as No. 3 in the country, redshirt freshman Jackson Withrow who was ranked as high as No. 6 in the land, and current true freshman Jeremy Efferding who was ranked as high as No. 5.
 

tennis_tater

Semi-Pro
Krueger into the semis of Wimbledon junior. He's had a pretty good showing this spring/early summer. Not sure if there is anything official on him going pro or not, but given his recent results, I don't think anyone could fault him if he decided to give the pro route a shot.
 

ClarkC

Hall of Fame
Krueger into the semis of Wimbledon junior. He's had a pretty good showing this spring/early summer. Not sure if there is anything official on him going pro or not, but given his recent results, I don't think anyone could fault him if he decided to give the pro route a shot.

Even though I am a Virginia fan, not a Texas A&M fan, I hope Krueger plays at least one year of college. I think it is the best thing for just about every American junior player. If he were guaranteed to go undefeated in NCAA tennis and be bored to death, that would be a different story.
 

db379

Hall of Fame
Anyone heard or seen in action these new recruits for Stanford?
Nolan Paige
Anthony Tsodikov

I hope there's really good because Stanford lost their 2 top players this year, and my worst nightmare is to see Kandath play #1 next season...!!!
 

ClarkC

Hall of Fame
Anyone heard or seen in action these new recruits for Stanford?
Nolan Paige
Anthony Tsodikov

I hope there's really good because Stanford lost their 2 top players this year, and my worst nightmare is to see Kandath play #1 next season...!!!

Nolan Paige will not play ahead of Kandath. Trey Strobel and Tsodikov are similar in ability to Paige. The Polish recruit is the wild card, but #1 as a freshman would probably be a stretch.

Stanford will have a deep team but will not have elite guys like Clayton, Klahn, and Thacher available in the top half of the lineup. Third place in the Pac-12 would be an excellent season for them.
 

tball2day

Semi-Pro
I don't know him, but I see it's just a verbal on his profile, so that's certainly easy to change.
 
Last edited:

Joeyg

Semi-Pro
It should actually be fun going to a few "Standford" matches this year. I think 3rd in the very deep Pac12 (10, 8 whatever) would be a good showing.
 

ClarkC

Hall of Fame
Until they enroll it is easy to change. No rules against decommitting from a Letter of Intent. Unethical maybe, but not a binding agreement.

False. Rules can be found at the NCAA letter of intent page.

What is the National Letter of Intent (NLI)?

The NLI is a binding agreement between a prospective student-athlete and an NLI member institution

A prospective student-athlete agrees to attend the institution full-time for one academic year (two semesters or three quarters).
The institution agrees to provide athletics financial aid for one academic year (two semesters or three quarters).
Basic penalty for not fulfilling the NLI agreement: A student-athlete has to serve one year in residence (full-time, two semesters or three quarters) at the next NLI member institution and lose one season of competition in all sports.

However, Adams has apparently not signed an LOI.
 

ClarkC

Hall of Fame
I suppose that Mitchell Krueger turning pro could have freed up scholarship money at Texas A&M. Still, Harrison Adams is from Austin and supposedly has been interested in Texas for a long time. He wanted to start in January at Texas. We will see how this plays out.
 

10isplayer

Semi-Pro
Harrison Adams tweeted "For anyone who didn't know already I have changed my commitment from UT to A&M." I wonder if his plan is to still go to school in January.
 

tball2day

Semi-Pro
False. Rules can be found at the NCAA letter of intent page.



However, Adams has apparently not signed an LOI.

Thanks for posting Clark. Yes, only verbals can be changed "easily," (still a lot of angst and emotion involved generally even to change a verbal). But the NLOI is a contract, and while not impossible, much more difficult to undo without serious repercussions.
 

ClarkC

Hall of Fame
That may be, however it runs contrary to multuple coaches I've spoken with recently. One of them has been a head coach for over 30 years and currently at a top 10 program year in and year out.

This has been the situation with an LOI in all sports for decades. I think you had a communication problem with the coaches you spoke to.
 

andfor

Legend
This has been the situation with an LOI in all sports for decades. I think you had a communication problem with the coaches you spoke to.

I always admire the way you put things when in disagreement. I'll go back and confirm my communication problem. Ha ha
 

SoCal10s

Hall of Fame
Anyone heard or seen in action these new recruits for Stanford?
Nolan Paige
Anthony Tsodikov

I hope there's really good because Stanford lost their 2 top players this year, and my worst nightmare is to see Kandath play #1 next season...!!!

Tsodikov lost 1st round @K-Zoo already he's still in the back draw..the kid who beat him lost(retired)the next round..
 
Hey Clark,

I have liked your previous analyses on each year's big 3 potential recruits who have the ability to immediately impact a team's lineup. For this past college season, the best possible recruits you indicated were Jack Sock, Mitchell Frank, and Marcos Giron. I was wondering who you thought the best possible 3 recruits were this year? Was it Bjorn Fratangelo, Mitchell Kruger, and Mac Styslinger? and Who do you think are the big 3 for this next recruiting season?
 

mikej

Hall of Fame
Well Redlicki just beat styslinger in kalamazoo so he has to be considered in that list.

yeah, #2 seed at the zoo, with wins over the likes of ouellette, simmonds, venus, and former illini ruben gonzales (twice) in the past three months...probably belongs in that list
 

ClarkC

Hall of Fame
Hey Clark,

I have liked your previous analyses on each year's big 3 potential recruits who have the ability to immediately impact a team's lineup. For this past college season, the best possible recruits you indicated were Jack Sock, Mitchell Frank, and Marcos Giron. I was wondering who you thought the best possible 3 recruits were this year? Was it Bjorn Fratangelo, Mitchell Kruger, and Mac Styslinger? and Who do you think are the big 3 for this next recruiting season?

This year, the big three all turned pro: Fratangelo, Peliwo, Krueger. That is pretty unusual. I think that leave a lot of very good players who were originally in the #4-#8 range, and we will have to see which ones become the best this spring. None of the guys who actually went to college were in the elite level where people are speculating that they might skip college. That is not to say that none of them will be college stars, because a couple probably will.

This year, it looks like Ronnie Schneider (early UNC commit), Mackenzie McDonald (northern California kid), and Connor Farren (also northern California, been sick lately, I think), although the group right behind them has some guys who are very competitive with them. Will be interesting to see if Stanford can keep one of the northern Cal elite kids home.
 
Top