It's all fun and games until federer misses out on his only opportunity at a gold medal in history. And when Nadal ends up with a leading H2H, the most weeks of wait before declaring retirement, federer will long be remembered as a Steffi Graf Player. Lots of records and great by outlasting his younger rivals
I doubt the roof will be over the federer-Murray match, so indoor conditions won't be able to save him this time...
It's all fun and games until federer misses out on his only opportunity at a gold medal in history. And when Nadal ends up with a leading H2H, the most slams, the most masters shields AND at least one Olympic gold medal in singles (and a calendar year grand slam), federer will long be remembered as a Jimmy Connors or Ivan Lendl-type player. Lots of records but largely irrelevant in the best-of-all-time discussion.
No disrespect to Murray, but I think most people would say that guy has no clue what he's talking about..
From same article he also said this in 2011
"I don't see any reason why he won't have a fantastic clay court season."
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying how can we possibly ever know.
You can say Federer has 17 slams and all these records and sublime skills but I've also seen Murray legitimately bagel Nadal for the loss of only 4 points in the set and Nadal said Murray was completely unplayable.
What I'm saying is would Federer's A game stand up to that.
Truth is we don't really know.
I don't care which dude wins. I just hope whichever one it is they beat Lance in the final. The very thought of witnessing another ape impersonation while he puts his grubby hands on yet another trophy makes me want to puke.
LOL Lance is the best nickname yet. And don't worry, I have a good feeling about this tournament. Murray is looking very fit (he got HUGE over the offseason, maybe he should be called Lance) and hasn't dropped a set. Roger got his bad match of the tournament out of his system and I don't think he will serve that poorly again. Whichever one of them meets Armstrong in the final has a great chance.
" I am getting closer"
...He is playing superb tennis, much more aggressive, much less antics.
Murray has only faced one player in the top 30-40??? What a joke
Yeah, that's completely crap. Murray's "most difficult draw of the top 4" has disintegrated and become a cakewalk. How dare he not demand a re-draw or swap with federer. Murray's fault.
True, but also true that his draw has been weak. Even the most ardent Murray supporters know that. Not that nobody else in history has ever had a weak draw mind you.
Yeah, that's completely crap. Murray's "most difficult draw of the top 4" has disintegrated and become a cakewalk. How dare he not demand a re-draw or swap with federer. Murray's fault.
Murray's gonna take this, no doubt. Either that or Fed will win.
Murray's gonna take this, no doubt. Either that or Fed will win.
I don't care which dude wins. I just hope whichever one it is they beat Lance in the final. The very thought of witnessing another ape impersonation while he puts his grubby hands on yet another trophy makes me want to puke.
I'm neutral on Nole, but the CVAC/Lance blasts are pretty funny.
I think Roger and Murray are going to wear each other out, giving Nole a clear path. Even if Ferrer gives Nole a tough match, Nole will have that extra day of rest for the final. I think the US Open result was a bit fluky with the wind, and I just felt like subconsciously Novak didn't want it that bad, sort of like Fed at the Olympics.
Look whom he has faced: Haase, Sousa, Berankis, Simon, Chardy! Puhleeeeze!
How can you even classify it as "superb" when he hasn't face one challenge yet?
With Fed's A game, the only person I give a chance is Nadal on clay. It really doesn't matter otherwise, he's capable of destroying Djoker, Murray etc.
But of course, that Fed only shows up for maybe a few games in a match nowdays.
If Roger is to lose, I want to see him get beaten by superb play from Muzza, not because of stupid lapses and mistakes like wasting bp's and getting broken when leading 40-0, which as we all know Fed specializes in these days.
Basically, I want Muzza to earn it if he's to win, that will result in a nice match. Although of course I want Fed to win !!
I agree with you, Murray's beaten nobody. Much like Federer's AO title runs where he didn't have to face a top 4 player apart from JC Ferrero in 2004. He won 2006, 2007 and 2010 ALL without having to face a top 4 opponent.
He also won a couple of WImbledon's with this method. No wonder he's got so many major titles...
I agree with you, Murray's beaten nobody. Much like Federer's AO title runs where he didn't have to face a top 4 player apart from JC Ferrero in 2004. He won 2006, 2007 and 2010 ALL without having to face a top 4 opponent.
He also won a couple of WImbledon's with this method. No wonder he's got so many major titles...
Hell TRUE! When fed plays at his best there is no one that can beat him apart from nadal on clay.Like in Rg 2011 semis.
yeah, no, murray was ranked #4 in 2010 and roddick #4 in 2007 as well ....( yeah, draw changes based on the seedings, but not the calibre of the player)
I suppose tsonga yesterday , nalbandian in AO 2004, agassi in AO 2005 , davydenko in AO 2006 , gonzalez in AO 2007, davydenko in AO 2010 were also weak opponents ... bwahahaha ...
Weren't you also saying federer would fall before the quarters this time ? LOL, another fail ....
While we're at it, where's your thread comparing nadal's and hewitt's returning ? :lol:
Weren't you saying nadal's return is better than hewitt's ? :lol:
....there's a reason Rafa has 11 majors and DOMINATES the top 4 in slam h2h.....
Yeah that was before the draw came out. Ah well nobody is always right, I know you're certainly wrong more often than right though.
It was Nadal's BH vs Hewitt's not the return. I'm not surprised a bunch of Fed warehouse people come barging in to talk up Hewitt only because they despise Nadal.
Hewitt's pushing style CC BH is not as good as Rafa's there's a reason Rafa has 11 majors and DOMINATES the top 4 in slam h2h compared to Hewitt who only has a couple of majors, one of which was a cakewalk Wimbledon draw.
According to you Hewitt has a far better return, better BH, just as good defense, and better volleys. LOL, you would think he'd have a few more titles if that was the case...
You refer to Hewitt having better returns based on his success against Roddick's serve, tell me what's Hewitt record against Ivo Karlovic compared to Nadal who even beat Ivo on carpet in 2004 lol. Nadal has also never lost to Isner whereas Hewitt has. Hewitt and Roddick are 7 all head to head whereas Rafa leads Roddick 7-3. So if Hewitt is a FAR better returner combined witth all those other better attributes than Nadal that I listed why is it that Nadal has beaten all these rocket servers more comfortably than Hewitt? Not to mention how well Rafa handles Fed's serve compared to Hewitt.
Seedings are tournament rankings that's what matters most. And besides that there are still FOUR majors Fed has won without having to beat a ranked 4 opponent.
Yeah that was before the draw came out. Ah well nobody is always right, I know you're certainly wrong more often than right though.
It was Nadal's BH vs Hewitt's not the return. I'm not surprised a bunch of Fed warehouse people come barging in to talk up Hewitt only because they despise Nadal.
Hewitt's pushing style CC BH is not as good as Rafa's there's a reason Rafa has 11 majors and DOMINATES the top 4 in slam h2h compared to Hewitt who only has a couple of majors, one of which was a cakewalk Wimbledon draw.
According to you Hewitt has a far better return, better BH, just as good defense, and better volleys. LOL, you would think he'd have a few more titles if that was the case...
You refer to Hewitt having better returns based on his success against Roddick's serve, tell me what's Hewitt record against Ivo Karlovic compared to Nadal who even beat Ivo on carpet in 2004 with a breadstick third set lol. Nadal has also never lost to Isner whereas Hewitt has. Hewitt and Roddick are 7 all head to head whereas Rafa leads Roddick 7-3. So if Hewitt is a FAR better returner combined witth all those other better attributes than Nadal that I listed why is it that Nadal has beaten all these rocket servers more comfortably than Hewitt? Not to mention how well Rafa handles Fed's serve compared to Hewitt.
The first time Nadal played Ivo was 2008 Queens. He won that match but there were no breadsticks. He's also never played Ivo on carpet.
The Olympics Final at Wimbledon was the first match in which I saw Murray completely outplay federer in a best of 5 sets match. The best federer could manage was losing a 6-4 set. So federer would do well to try to lose a 7-5 or 7-6 set this time, or perhaps even win a set.
eh, really ? he had davydenko in 2R, tomic in 3R and raonic in 4R ... that's certainly not anywhere close to easy for those rounds ...
eh, I know you created the thread comparing their BHs. Pretty sure very few "put down" nadal's BH ... they just stated the reality ,which is that hewitt's BH and rafa's BH were on similar level
But you were also saying rafa's return was better than hewitt's, which is why I asked where is the thread comparing their returns :lol:..
In case you still didn't get it, I meant when were you going to start that thread comparing their returns !
what a load of cr*p. Have you even watched hewitt play that much ?
hewitt's BH was no "push" ... he could get sufficient pace and depth on it and he went DTL wayyy more than rafa did ...his main problem in the ground game was his FH was not big enough ...
I said their BHs were on a similar level ....rafa has a way better FH, better serve ....defense is comparable, rafa is slightly better ...
I said hewitt has a clearly better return based on actually watching them both return, him having clearly superior percentage of return games won on grass and hard ... based on him handling a variety of servers darn well ( from sampras to henman to rafter to roddick to federer ) only exception being karlovic ... not one factor ....
Hewitt handled federer's serve slightly better than nadal did ( and nadal's returning vs federer is better than what you'd expect when you consider his returning vs the field ) ... you actually need to go and watch .....
nadal is 4-3 vs roddick off clay, hewitt is 7 all overall (at one stage he was 5-1), in 2004-05, when both were playing well, it was 3-2 to hewitt ...
Seedings are tournament rankings that's what matters most. And besides that there are still FOUR majors Fed has won without having to beat a ranked 4 opponent.
again, we're talking about the "calibre", not the draw when talking about top 4 opponents ...
again, like I said he faced players who were playing better than the others in the top 4 - nalbandian in AO 2004, agassi in AO 2005, davydenko in AO 2006, AO 2010, gonzalez in AO 2007, tsonga yesterday ...
would federer face #4 ferrer or an on-song tsonga like yesterday ?
pretty sure #15 seed stan gave djok a much sterner test than ferrer will .....
out of those 4 majors without a top 4 opponent -
Wimbledon 2003, he faced the other 2 best grass-courters that time - roddick, philippoussis
USO 2004 - hewitt was #5, but had come through to the finals without dropping a set , agassi was playing well as well , roddick was upset by JJ, federer would've handled him obviously had they met ...
FO 2009 - delpo played darn well , much better than #4 murray ever did on clay ) and better than anything #3 djoker had shown at that time on clay ...haas and soderling were no pushovers either ...
AO 2006 was relatively the weakest, but he still did go through an in-form davy ( apart from baggy, haas )
LOL Davydenko is WELL past it, I'm sure he'll have another good Doha run next year unless he retires. Raonic was injured. Tomic is an arrogant brat and I enjoyed watching Fed beat him.
Yeah, sure there's no Nadal haters on this website...
Typical Hewitt rally, CC BH x 10 unless he hits the net.
Ah so by watching you've come up with Hewitt is a far better returner. Oh well, let's never mind the results then ok. So Rafa magically returns better against Ivo and Federer. Comparing to Rafter and Sampras isn't justifiable since Rafa didn't play them. He did breadstick Henman on HC though.
And Rafa is 5-3 vs Roddick off clay and that includes beating him 7-5 6-4 on GRASS. In any case there is no proof whatsoever that Hewitt handles Roddick better than Nadal. You only have your opinion which is based on nothing more than your hatred of Nadal, I hope it's not because Nadal smashes Fed in majors is it?
Listen you can try your best to justify it as much as you want, the truth is those guys are clowns compared to Federer, Rafa, Murray and Novak in terms of consistency at slam level. Delpo is the only one with potential to consistently make and possibly win slam finals.
Djoker in 09 pushed Rafa to the limit in Madrid which is far more than what Delpo ever showed on clay.
If prime Rafa was given Fed's draws at WIM03 & 09 or Fed's draw at AO04,06 and 07 he would win them. The only questionable one would be AO2010 because Murray proved he was too good for Rafa in that one, but then again that was a QF, in the final probably would've been a different story, I can't see Murray playing his best match of the year in a major final back in 2010.
LOL, raonic must be taking lessons from rafa - excuses and injury reports come up after the match ...
tomic being arrogant or not , you enjoying it or not is irrelevant ...
point was it wasn't an easy draw by any means ...
since when did nearly no hateful comments on that thread equate to no nadal haters ? Only in the mind of the disordered !
typical ignorance ...
Can you even read ? I said watching+ backed up by the return stats >> but then you remain the same as ever, clueless and can't read fully or cherry pick ....
hewitt is in the discussion of the best returners ever, nadal isn't close ..you are just proving yourself dumber and stubborn here ...
since when did having a better h2h equate to better returning ?
I don't hate nadal, lol, I think he has ATG movement, passing shots, FH , very clutch and yes, a a serve that is pretty good as well .....
The 2 parts of his game that are relatively the weakest are his 2nd serve and his returning ... Its just reality ...
Nah, he got them from Federer whinging after his embarrassing WIM2010 loss.
so past it Davy, cocky Tomic (who has beaten NOBODY) and injured Raonic is hard? lol.
Yet Agassi one of the best returners of all time said Nadal's second serve was incredibly hard to return. LOL.
Hewitt's a good returner no doubt, but he's hardly had far more success against the best servers than Nadal has. In fact his only win over Ivo was on clay and even that he nearly lost.
we aren't talking about consistency here . we're talking about who was playing well .. pretty sure soderling's/tsonga's level when playing well tops that of "consistent" ferrer
besides if we're only talking about these top 4 - fed,nadal,djoker, murray, that's from 2009 onwards ... that's a different thing ... you were just talking about facing the top 4 players in the draw ...
AO 2004, 06,2007 .... fed would've beaten any of the others in the top 4 ... he just happened to beat more in-form players
so you fail here as well ....
eh, no ... delpo in RG 2009 SF played by some distance better than djoker did in madrid 2009 ... also delpo breadsticked nadal on clay @ the davis cup and took him farther than djoker ever has in a best of 5 ...
LOL no ... nadal would be in trouble vs roddick/scud in wim 03, nalbandian in AO 2004/davydenko in AO 2006 ( and those 2 match up far better vs rafa than vs fed, if they gave fed tough matches, nadal sure as heck would be in trouble ) ... gonzo would be big trouble in AO 2007 given he was playing darn well
relatively easiest would be AO 2006 ...
yeah, only federer was taping up @ the wimbledon IIRC and it was obvious he had problems, and that was his worst wimbledon in 10 years .....
except for wawrinka who actually showed up, who else would be harder from 2R to 4R ?
he easily had the toughest quarter final match as well and won
IIRC, agassi didn't say rafa's 2nd serve was incredibly hard to return, he said it was tougher to return than it looked due to the spin
hewitt isn't just a good returner, at his peak, he was one of the very best of all time ...
here is a quote from sampras :
"He returned and passed about as well as anyone I've ever played," Sampras said. "He's got the best return and the best wheels in the game."
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/tennis/2001/us_open/news/2001/09/09/usopen_sunday_ap/
if you actually watched him play @ his peak, you'd know ...
google for more info on hewitt and his returning at his peak ... look at the short list for best returners ever, you'll find hewitt inevitably in those lists ...
Fed would've beaten them would he? Tell me what is his record vs top 4 opponents at the AO?
So Delpo is a better clay courter than Novak now? lol.
Djoker had match points against Nadal in a 4 hour epic 3 setter and Delpo played better in the RG semi? LMAO he was gassed by the time the fifth started the only reason he broke back was because he is a fighter and found something extra but by then it was too late.
Nadal has beaten Roddick comfortably on grass and also beaten Philippousis at US Open in straights all with getting a break of serve. You are delusional because you think Rafa struggles everytime he faces a bomb server but the FACTS show that this clearly isn't the case.
As for Davy giving Rafa trouble lol. seriously look at Murray's record vs Fed in the mickey mouse tournaments and tell me that has been a factor in their slam matches. Nadal lost to Davydenko in succession in late 09 and very early 2010. Davydenko was playing a well below his best Nadal.
With Nalbandian, he would give Rafa trouble, but I'd still back Rafa to beat him.
As for Gonzo, lol. He destroyed Nadal in 07 but that was after Rafa played a gruelling 5 setter against Murray, at the time, Rafa was only able to back up on clay, on HC it was a different story it takes a heavier toll on the body and Nadal was still only 20 at the time. Put 2009-2012 form Rafa there and he'd beat Gonzo for sure.