I agree, the last pull is the worse due to the tie off but it doesn't feel like it affect or have any difference for me. It's too far away from the impact zone.
That sounds really accurate. I wanted to try the fish scale method too but I never had one.
It's just a frame of reference thing. I look at stringing from both a client and provider side. If you string for others (service provider), the last string can be an indicator of quality. I agree with you that it's more or less a non-issue for play purposes, but clients can (and have often) use(d) the "check the outer mains" as a reality check to see if you're a "good stringer' or not. It's silly, but it happens. I nitpick on these things because it matters in some scenarios. I agree with you, though. If you string for yourself, it really shouldn't make any difference (and actually might make more sense in practice -- look up proportional stringing).
Digital fishing scales are super cheap, and it's a nice tool to have in your repertoire (<$10 online)
OP: I think the "secret" here is that you learn to live with what your machine gives you at the ostensible tension. Once I had to work with two stringers: one man's 64 pounds was very different from the other's. I learned to tell him to go 62.
I'm still confused, by the way, that somehow you've found the Kmate to be off the mark; how this happened.
That's way too logical, max
It's a funny thing -- as stringers, the concept of reference tension should be very intuitive, but as customers, it's not obvious that this is the case. "I've strung my racquets for 60 lbs for years! Why are your string jobs so tight/loose?!" I've found that there are just customers that really don't want to be educated.
I don't know what to tell u. According to my fish scale, my kmate is off by 1 lb 4 oz. I dont think thats too bad though. Do you? Or maybe the fish scale IS off like you suggested.
Note: "According to my fish scale..."
It's entirely possible that your fish scale is offset, although accurate (linearity wise). Note that there is/was some standard that the scale was calibrated against. You should be using at least one reality check measure to confirm your scale. Generally speaking, dropweights should be VERY accurate at horizontal, within margin of manufacturing tolerance (which should translate into negligible offset). The tension pulled is simple physics -- the loss you should account for is friction loss in a frame. If you're calibrating "through" a frame (aka with a frame mounted), that could explain the difference. What's your calibration scheme/setup look like?
With no frame
OR
with a frame in the machine, stringing the calibrator through the frame (mains).
Generally, you'd calibrate without a frame, but I personally like to calibrate with a frame
[When calibrating at a tournament, though, I'll match calibration procedures to the rest of the machines]