There is something in what he says. Maybe it's just that today there is too much corruption (adulteration of construction material).No man today can construct these monuments because they were generally built by kings spending people's tax money like water, using what was practically slave labor, and taking decades to build something. The main purpose was to impress upon the people the divine connection between the king and the great powers above and give him the right to rule.
There is nothign in that temples construction that could not be replicated if it was so desired.
but with enough money that could be built today and be more durable. There is no doubt in my mind.
Don't know about taxes, but something like that always existed. They were called "tributes" or whatever.
but they were often erected to show off a King's superiority,.
There is nothign in that temples construction that could not be replicated if it was so desired.
Slave conditions or whatever aside. The amazement in these structures is the size and scale and how it corelates to the time involved in building such a thing.
but with enough money that could be built today and be more durable. There is no doubt in my mind.
That is fair.
But coming back to the point, all such monuments have been shown to have been constructed using simple tools and a lot of time and labor. No need for ancient aliens and their laser machining equipment.
Yeah right...
How do you lift those pyramid stones with the technology they hade at that time?
For me, this is the truly fascinating thing. I'm not an engineer, but this really is an amazing story.
S., I'm sure you're passionate, but there is the question lingering of what extent some of the "people" actually shared in the desire to form monuments, etc. Consider prehistoric times.
I simply wonder at what skills we as a people have lost over time.
Think of how the railroad bridges, etc., were built in Switzerland without computers; how the moonshot took place with a minimal computing base, etc.
Then why the so called Kings represented their buddhist culture carving the statues of Buddha instead of themselves ? stupid argument i say or you just trollign
And also, why even build something so difficult?
Come on!! we know we cant build those kind of monuments/ structures / temples with all the money as those were build with some extreme engineering skills as it was proved and it was also pointed out that materials/tools they used are many times better than what we use today. Also its just not about construction techniques but they also represented some spiritual advancement for them . this is the top view of the buddhist Borobudur temple in indonesia i am talking about
Apparently it represents some buddhist mandala with perfect geometry and it is one of the main structures mainly used for meditation techniques
now tell me we can do that
Don't say someone is trolling if you disagree with them, please. Just stick to the facts.
Kings have done both - made statues of themselves and of gods, to show that they have the divine right to rule. One boosts the other.
The other reason is to propagate their religion. The South Asian temples were constructed in times when Hinduism and Buddhism were vying for popularity. Big monuments served to boost one side or the other.
Ok enough internet for me today that is the most stupid argument i have ever seen , so are you suggesting that there were no temples until when hinduism waited for buddhism to appear many centuries later and then the kings waited for it to come and build them out of competition lol....its not that if someones life is boring they go to places like these or admire them ..and you produce every argument like you have seen everything in person or lived in some kings body :lol:
Don't say someone is trolling if you disagree with them, please. Just stick to the facts.
Kings have done both - made statues of themselves and of gods, to show that they have the divine right to rule. One boosts the other.
The other reason is to propagate their religion. The South Asian temples were constructed in times when Hinduism and Buddhism were vying for popularity. Big monuments served to boost one side or the other.
You are exactly the audience the show targets.
How the stones were lifted has been well studied. You can find them yourself.
I was told since childhood that it was impossible to build them using any known technology. But I don't believe that any more.
Well I've asked many of my engineers and architects friends about the subject and all the studies you seem to refer to are only theories.
There are no solid proof or explenation of how those pyramids were built.
now tell me we can do that
I can't believe people just can't give credit to the aliens when there is no simpler explanation. Trying to come out with some coc and bull story about canals and slopes for getting huge slabs to the top of a mountain a thousand miles away just to give credit to some humans in loincloths without even air-conditioning or microwave.
FCS, the truth is staring us in the face. The aliens were here. It's on the cave walls, even. They did stuff for the ancients and then went back to Betelguese.
^ Yeah, I have read of Indian scriptures that have details of all kinds of crafts that can rise silently, hover, and so forth. Not sure whether that was the science fiction/fantasy of the day or what.
The aliens taught us Sanskrit. These secrets are cleverly coded into the scriptures to fool people of lesser intelligence like you. But smart alecs like me can see through layers of code. They gave advanced wireless television technology to Dhritrashtra in his condo to see the Mahabharata war far away. Those hundred sons were through in-vitro fertilization.Or could they have been due to ................. ancient aliens???????
The aliens taught us Sanskrit. These secrets are cleverly coded into the scriptures to fool people of lesser intelligence like you. But smart alecs like me can see through layers of code. They gave advanced wireless television technology to Dhritrashtra in his condo to see the Mahabharata war far away. Those hundred sons were through in-vitro fertilization.
many believe we evolved from monkeys or something around 5000 years ago or so as darwin likes us to believe.
Former Knicks guard Baron Davis recounts 'alien abduction'
:roll: oh dear, Sanjaya was the installation guy. He was a bonafide alien.No, actually they gave it to Sanjaya.
WTF did I just read?
not 5000 dude more like 500000 years since we started diverging from apes
Not this apes#it again !humans did exist from many thousands of years before > 10000 yrs atleast as many archaeological theories are now uncovering ........
The fact that people take this show seriously is greatly diminishing science as a whole.
These are must watches.
Dr. Greer's UFO disclosure
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUk
Bob Lazar interview
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VWmNm6J09M
Lord Siva and Krishna were from Pandora.That is exactly what I am saying. Modern humans are around 200,000 years old.
Actually, we can do better than that. For example, take the Moscow Metro.
It has 188 stations (one of which is on a bridge above the Moscow River), 313 km of track, and transports 7 million passengers on an average day. And, it's almost entirely underground. http://www.mosmetro.ru/about/
Do you seriously think that an underground station with pictures on it matches the borobudur architecture with statues carved out of pure rock that stood the test of time with considerations of how the top view and every view should be and constructed with geometry and advanced tools that modern scientists cannot even fathom and get a hold of 'em and there is no blueprint of it anywhere Think not !
Do you seriously think that an underground station with pictures on it matches the borobudur architecture with statues carved out of pure rock that stood the test of time with considerations of how the top view and every view should be and constructed with geometry and advanced tools that modern scientists cannot even fathom and get a hold of 'em and there is no blueprint of it anywhere Think not !
^^^ That technology was given to us by ancient aliens
^^^ So there we have conclusive proof of ancient aliens. Hubble may have been one of them.