I like the Clarkster, just pointing out that sometimes people's opinion of others are based on whether they like "their favorite pro" is a tad shallow. In this case, Arias' commentary ALONE should be the determining factor as to whether he's a good commentator, not whether or not he likes Federer. And if he likes Fed and expresses admiration for his game, well, what the heck is wrong with that?
Fed's style of play or "game" (shotmaking, movement, talent, etc.) clearly deserves admiration from anyone who loves tennis and can appreciate a special one-of-a-kind great (as is also the case with Nadal). And this appreciation of such greatness (be it Fed, Nadal, Djoko or past greats) should not be limited to shallow fanboy/fangirl "1-trick-pony" sniping.
And, why I idiotically (and idiotically) poke fun at a fanboy's "favorite pro" player: simply to bust the unreasonable "ta
rds'" chops. They deserve it....besides, it's fun. ; -)
Oh btw, fwiw, Jimmy Arias in his day WAS the real deal....and probably knows a thing or two about tennis.