why is tsonga not using pure strike tour??

Lukhas

Legend
He has customized it. His is 325g unstrung with a custom handle to make it longer. The lighter the base racquet, the more easy it is to customize it. Not to mention that he most likely wanted to keep the 100in² headsize and 16/19 pattern he's accustomed with.
 
I think it has more to do with advertising and the consumer audience. Not a lot of people are able to handle the "Tour" version. Since the standard version fits a bigger variety of players, it would make sense to emphasize its endorsement more.
 

kingcheetah

Hall of Fame
I agree with greystar. Tsonga's the second biggest name using Babolat, so they are going to want to capitalize on the money they're sending him and use him to try to make people try and buy pure strikes... since the 100 is the one most people would be able to use effectively, that's the one they advertise.
 

Fed Kennedy

Legend
He has customized it. His is 325g unstrung with a custom handle to make it longer. The lighter the base racquet, the more easy it is to customize it. Not to mention that he most likely wanted to keep the 100in² headsize and 16/19 pattern he's accustomed with.

This is your answer. It has nothing to do with marketing to hackers
 

Kalin

Legend
He sucks, that's why!

Just kidding, he probably has it customized just the way he likes it; the paintjob was most likely decided by Babolat's marketing team
 

degrease

Rookie
I do like how some people are just sooo sceptical. Paint job is the default setting. The distinctive throat of an apd looks nothing like a conventional racket yet they still say paint job. If tsonga used a cricket bat they would say it a paint job of his old apd
 

Phalagoo

Rookie
Well like the others said, Tsonga's rackets, like any other players' rackets, are customized. And plus, it's not like the stock form Tsonga's previous racket was that heavy. Tsonga is known to put long strips of lead tape on his rackets.
 

Phalagoo

Rookie
I should have included that basically, weight and balance are customizable and not to worry about. It's the specifications like the beam width, string pattern, and head size that aren't able to be customized easily.
 
I do like how some people are just sooo sceptical. Paint job is the default setting. The distinctive throat of an apd looks nothing like a conventional racket yet they still say paint job. If tsonga used a cricket bat they would say it a paint job of his old apd

Man, it is not even tsonga out there. Underneath the fit, french biracial guy with curly dark hair, it is shane warne. just a really good paintjob.
 
Thanks, i don't know why i thought of an australian cricketer. Must've been during the oz oipen.
Could have gone with someone more popular in france and the us. Like jerry lewis.

Back on topic.
It has to be the string pattern. Jo is used to having 16 mains. His APDs were/are generally loaded up with a ton of silicone in the handle and upwards of 12g of lead in the head. So i am sure what he is packing is specd out much heavier than a tour, but w the sotring oattern and headsize of a strike 100.

I am going to get a pair of the strike 16x18 when it comes out in may. Probably do the silicone and lead thing, too.
 
Last edited:

Axtkampfer

New User
I purchased, played with and eventually sold the PST for the best part of two months. Loved the racquet once I tweaked it to be more headlight, but I never felt "connected" to the ball, as much as I did with the Blade 93.

Different beasts - one that I've managed to tame, and one that (for my game) I will admire from afar.

Props to Babolat for introducing the Strike line of racquets. If not for the lack of "feel" I'd have switched to the PST in a heartbeat.
 
Top