captain kirk
New User
Seriously, I remember when these shirts used to cost $40, now they're selling for $70.
Nike Men's Spring Premier Rafa Crew
Nike Men's Spring Premier Rafa Crew
inflation man. racquets didn't used to be 200 dollars now some are more than that!
inflation man. racquets didn't used to be 200 dollars now some are more than that!
Seriously, I remember when these shirts used to cost $40, now they're selling for $70.
Nike Men's Spring Premier Rafa Crew
nike pays rafa and fed a lot of $$,$$$,$$$ to wear nike gear. the costs of advertising and sponsorship get passed to the consumers.
Yeah but this was only a few years ago that they cost almost twice as less.
I've noticed it with the Free Run shoes too. In 2011 I paid $80 for a pair, now they're going at $110 for basically the same shoe. I know inflation has to be counted in, but inflation isn't that high.
I think Nike pays them a lot of money because they can then drive up prices. Not necessarily Nike needs to come up with cash to justify it, I'm sure they can pay them and them some out of just sneaker sales, nvm whatever else Nike sells.
Nike, I believe, has a fair amount of pricing power. It seems they've found that a considerable portion of their customers have inelastic demand for the products (meaning they aren't very price sensitive).
As long as they gain more profit on the remaining sales than they lose in product sold, they win.
By paying Federer and Nadal a lot of money to wear the clothing, they're changing the brand into a luxury brand that can compete against luxury brands such as Lacoste. The Air Jordan basketball shoes became a luxury brand long ago and are hugely profitable for Nike.
Seriously, I remember when these shirts used to cost $40, now they're selling for $70.
Nike Men's Spring Premier Rafa Crew
Nike, I believe, has a fair amount of pricing power. It seems they've found that a considerable portion of their customers have inelastic demand for the products (meaning they aren't very price sensitive).
As long as they gain more profit on the remaining sales than they lose in product sold, they win.
By paying Federer and Nadal a lot of money to wear the clothing, they're changing the brand into a luxury brand that can compete against luxury brands such as Lacoste. The Air Jordan basketball shoes became a luxury brand long ago and are hugely profitable for Nike.
It's a combo of what Nike pays their stars and what consumers are willing to pay. Me? I generally wait until the garment goes on sale. Mostly shorts and shoes. Shirts, I generally buy from REI they have a great line of shirts with similar fabrics and they cost a fraction of Nike's.
Supply and Demand. Rafa and Fed are Nike's Dynamic Duo. Their stuff will always sell, and we will always buy. I'm just wondering if the Lunars are taking a hit due to their extreme price and Rafa not wearing them.
inflation man. racquets didn't used to be 200 dollars now some are more than that!
Actually, graphite racquet used to cost $300 in the 1970's so $200 today is a bargain and a huge drop in price (less than $100 in 1970's dollars).inflation man. racquets didn't used to be 200 dollars now some are more than that!
The Nike polos worn by Federer went from $45 to $50 to $60 to $65 to $70 to $80 and now they are $90. Totally ridiculous and not worth it!
Higher taxation and government regulation--corporations don't pay taxes, people do--any increases are passed along in the form of higher prices. Companies compete for customers, one way is lower prices. Unfortunately the tax man and politicians don't have to compete. Have a nice April 15th, April Fools is the warm-up. The cost of everything is going up primarily due to government/politician greed.
Haha. Listened to talksport today. They blasted Nike for charging consumers $150 for the new England World Cup jersey. I find it funny too how some rec tennis players have to have all Nike gear (or Adidas, or whatever) like they are sponsored. I buy what's on sale. I can say a polyester shirt is way better than a cotton one in terms of comfort to play with.
Cotton is better than polyester for everyday wear, but cotton becomes heavy and wet when playing due to perspiration and makes you feel even hotter as the fabric sticks to the skin.
Cotton is better than polyester for everyday wear, but cotton becomes heavy and wet when playing due to perspiration and makes you feel even hotter as the fabric sticks to the skin.
The treated polyester they use in sports shirts keeps you cool and dry so they are much better for tennis especially when its warm or during the daytime.
Thick cotton shirts this is true but thinner cotton is fantastic. I have some premium light cotton shirts and I prefer them much more to polyester. Cotton is more breathable than a polyester shirt you can't compare.
There is NO WAY a polyester shirt is better than cotton. Not even close, cotton is always more expensive fabric or textile. Cotton is true quality.
Like I said simple just wear cotton and polyester underwear for one day and see which is dryer and more comfortable by end of the day. Cotton is a clear, clear answer. Cotton breathes 100x more than polyester.
Polyester is crap.
I shake the hands of my opponents and they smell like skunks.
Better than very light, extra fine cotton and much more better than polyester is TENCEL (Lyocell), yarn made in Austria.
I wear these made in Germany shirts:
http://www.trigema.de/shop/product/...8083E5FB09AABD7B828F365FABA82D1?origin=extern
The chinese color in this n.ke crap is eating your skin. Sometimes you turn even yellow.
KR
^^hopefully you also wear that scarf when you play
Thick cotton shirts this is true but thinner cotton is fantastic. I have some premium light cotton shirts and I prefer them much more to polyester. Cotton is more breathable than a polyester shirt you can't compare.
Come on. Resistance is futile. Do your part to help the World Economy.I cried some GOATy tears today when I checked the Nike store.
I would imagine it's expensive because of Fed and Rafa, they both have expensive taste.