That's what I think is so good about Jimmy Arias. Give the players hell if you think they deserve it. I can't stand the equivocation* I hear in so much TV commentary. For example -- "I'm not sure if that's such a good idea at this time". You just said nothing, so next time literally keep your mouth shut.
* To avoid committing oneself in what one says
I think a better choice here may have been "hedging." Equivocating in commentary--at least in my opinion--is more when someone falsely, or unnecessarily gives equal weight to each side of an argument, usually when one is a minority position.
Hedging usually sounds something like, "So, Bobby, is Rafa gonna take this set if he holds right here?"
"Good question, Rod. See, if we're talking about Rafa playing a good game, then yeah, you can expect a hold, but if we see Rafa tighten up, like he's prone to doing then he might not. So on one hand, there is no way he loses, but the serve is crucial. But, if he fails to following it up by dictating with his forehand, then, well, Fognini might have a chance."
"I think you really hit on something there, Bobby, especially about Fognini--"
You get the idea. Endless circles of nonsense. Maybe that's a good example, maybe it's a bad one--I don't know--but I'm sticking by it.