FogerRederer
Rookie
Seeing as the other thread is bloated with a trivial debate over wristbands, I've started a new thread where we can share our thoughts on anything related to this new racquet that has grabbed our attention lately.
My big question is what is the benefit of textreme material for new prince rackets.......
Once more people try it out, I'd be interested to know if anyone can make comparisons to the following frames:
1. Pacific X Feel Pro 90 Vacuum
2. Pacific X Force Pro
3. Head IG Prestige Mid
4. Redondo 93
5. Dunlop MW200G
All of the above are currently in my bag and have very similar specs.
Once more people try it out, I'd be interested to know if anyone can make comparisons to the following frames:
1. Pacific X Feel Pro 90 Vacuum
2. Pacific X Force Pro
3. Head IG Prestige Mid
4. Redondo 93
5. Dunlop MW200G
All of the above are currently in my bag and have very similar specs.
tried out this frame today. Really liked it. Will play with it for a full week, but I'm thinking this may be my next "everyday" frame. we will see.
Potentially over the RF97?
Rf97a wasn't necessarily my "Everyday" frame. I love it because of all the attributes it has, power, stability, spin, control, etc. I also love the feel of it, however, I have been gravitating little by little to flexier frames. I have other racquets in my bag that I currently rotate which include pt57a and h22 both in 16/19 patterns. We will see how this frame does when I stringing it with gut/poly.
My big question is what is the benefit of textreme material for new prince rackets.......
Textreme feels very light but solid.
You feel Textreme Tour 95 swining like a 11oz strung racquet but still feel the solid of 12oz racquet.
is this better that Tour 95 that Yellow racket that Bryans are using for Doubles ?
I currently using the Blade 98 2015 18x20 and Graphene Speed Pro and wonder if you had a chance to play with either and can provide a comparison.
I think the best feeling racquet I demoed was the Yonex RDX500 98. It was just so perfect. So I saved my money and three months later I went to Swetka and it was gone so I bought the RDS 001 90 and then I bought the VCore Tour 89. I like both of the but I wish they played softer like my Wilson Ceramic 85 from High School. I hope that this Textreme 95 play softer than those Yonexs and more like the Ceramic and RDX 500. I would buy it for sure.
I just got mine today and will string it up to see how it plays. I love the paint job on the racquet and I like the balance of the racquet so far. Time will tell when I string this up and hit with it tomorrow.
Rf97a wasn't necessarily my "Everyday" frame. I love it because of all the attributes it has, power, stability, spin, control, etc. I also love the feel of it, however, I have been gravitating little by little to flexier frames. I have other racquets in my bag that I currently rotate which include pt57a and h22 both in 16/19 patterns. We will see how this frame does when I stringing it with gut/poly.
How would the tour 95 compare to the prostaff 95? I found the prostaff 95 realllyyyyyyyyyy lower powered, even after adding some lead at 3 and 9.
I haven't played with the Tex95 however judging by the specs (60RA average on TW website, 63RA on TWU) I'd guess it will be noticeably softer but not plush like some other 60RA frames.Hello, just wondering if you have an update. I love stiff frames but my elbow may need something softer. Currently playing with the PSC 4.2 which is extremely stiff. But I am not in my twenties anymore and my elbow feels it. I am very stubborn about switching and will only switch if the pain becomes really bad. Also recently bought the Pure Drive Tour which I love but may also be too stiff for me. How do you feel the comfort level is on the RF97 which is also on my radar?
I played with the PS97 for a while but developed elbow issues. So i started looking for less stifffer frames. The (yellow) Tour 95 (RA 58) felt pretty good and you could definitely feel the plushness and the flexible feeling and was much more comfortable for my arms. I tried the Textreme Tour 95 as the RA rating was 60 but it doesn't feel remotely as flexible as the (yellow) Tour 95. The racquet though is beautifully balanced, the feel is crisp, stable. I ended up getting the Textreme Tour 95 but my arms aren't as happy as they were with the (yellow) Tour 95.For those that have hit with it is it really flexible? The 60 stiffness rating would indicate that. I like stiffer racquets but TW review did mention it feels firmer than the rating.
I had a chance to hit with this racquet for about an hour. I strung it up with Head Hawk Touch at 52lbs and then realize that even though it's not a 16x19 string pattern, the smaller head size makes the string pattern a little tighter.
This was noticeable when hitting a ball. It's not really a open string pattern at least not like it is when you have it on a 98 or 100 sq in. racquet.
The racquet is rated at 60 stiffness but I didn't feel that softness compared to the Exo Tour racquet. I would say it's neither harsh or stiff but it definitely is more of a firm crisp feel to the racquet. It's not a plush and flexible racquet and the dwell time on the strings isn't as good as my current 2015 Blade 98 18x20 racquet.
For ground strokes, it hits a pretty solid ball and you can feel the impact of the ball on your string bed. It definitely is more crisp and firm feel to the racquet and nothing like the more flexible Prince Exo3 Tour line.
After adding the strings, dampener, and over grip, the racquet came out to 12.15oz.
Once the string bed has a little more time to bring in and another few hours on the court, I will be able to provide insight.
I played with the PS97 for a while but developed elbow issues. So i started looking for less stifffer frames. The (yellow) Tour 95 (RA 58) felt pretty good and you could definitely feel the plushness and the flexible feeling and was much more comfortable for my arms. I tried the Textreme Tour 95 as the RA rating was 60 but it doesn't feel remotely as flexible as the (yellow) Tour 95. The racquet though is beautifully balanced, the feel is crisp, stable. I ended up getting the Textreme Tour 95 but my arms aren't as happy as they were with the (yellow) Tour 95.
Okay so I am not the only one who feels this racquet is more on the crisp and firm side even though the RA is 60. This definitely feels like a different Prince racquet given most Prince racquets have a more plush feel to them.
It hits like a PS 95 but with a bit more stability but definitely feel the same hollowness of the PS 95.
Okay so I am not the only one who feels this racquet is more on the crisp and firm side even though the RA is 60. This definitely feels like a different Prince racquet given most Prince racquets have a more plush feel to them.
It hits like a PS 95 but with a bit more stability but definitely feel the same hollowness of the PS 95.
Hollowness? Relative to what?
How do you feel the comfort level is on the RF97 which is also on my radar?
I have the old Tour 95 and an RF97 (as well as the PS97). I haven't had the chance to try the new TexTour 95. The old Tour 95 is more comfortable than the RF97, but not by a huge margin. The mass of the RF97 helps offset the stiffness. The Tour 95 is much less powerful and also less work to wield than the RF97 -- I would consider that more than the comfort when deciding between the two.
I see some comments about the flexibility and launch angle of the old Tour 95 vs. the TexTour 95, but what about the power? Similar? Prince rates them the same.