Recent content by abmk

Fed loses 1 set to DJoko combined in 3 matches in 07-09 USO. Djoko loses 5 sets to fed 10,11,15 and 2 other sets literally have MPs The closest match Djokovic lost (USO 08) is less close than the least closest match he won (USO 15) Peakest djoko has to save 2 MPs vs 7th best USO fed in USO 11...

I saw the full match live on TV. I can describe that djokovic had couple of SPs for a bagel. Got broken and set became 6-2. 2nd set was close and Djokovic just edged it out. Now you do MC 2006 final (last 3 sets) and MC 2008 semi.

The problem is Fed got mono in 08. And djoko would've lost in 09/10 to fed at the AO, but lost before meeting him. Djoko has brought prime level himself only once from age of 29 onwards at AO for the slam - 2019. I count those 3 matches (AO 08/AO 11/AO 16) while considering Djoko's prime level...

Its like the crazy has spread like wildfire in the djoko fanbase. (smh)

both didn't say Berdych was weak in that MC 2015 final. But worse than wawa of MC 14 final. That's enough for a difference b/w a win and a loss in this case.

Of course he doesn't. No, I don't spend most of my time trying to nullify his achievements at all. Just spending part of TTW exposing the nonsense of so many of the Djoko fanbase since they have turned it to a dustbin to an significant extent with rampant nonsense. Let me know which one of...

Who denied those were strong level wins by Djokovic? All 3 were strong wins, all 3 among his top 5-top 7 wins at AO. Point is none of them were against anything close to prime level fed. But prime fed would've been a slight fav over DJoko of AO 08 if not for mono. 29 yo old Djoko was losing to...

vast difference in the subjective nature of the arguments. Not all subjective arguments are equal or make sense. so basically you got nothing. :-D :-D I apply the same standards when evaluating That's the point. Its hilariously funny how many Djokovic fans can't even admit djokovic isn't at...

I already gave Djoko his due as far as RG goes mentioning him taking prime Nadal to 5 sets at RG 13. Nadal was weaker at MC 13 than in MC 06-08. That's reality. Yes, Djokovic matches up better on clay, but you and others exaggerate the difference when it comes to a prime Nadal. I also mentioned...

pandemic and a whole slam is very different from having MP in a semi, LOL. Of course Djokovic wasn't there in AO 09/AO 10 when he'd have lost to fed at the AO. How can fed beat djoko after AO 07 if he wasn't close to prime form when he met Djokovic. And yes, fed was the best player at the AO...

nadal was in good form in RG 2021? by what standards? LOLOL. he was way below par by prime standards. not even close. He played a good 1st set, a decent 3rd set level wise, slightly above that overall considering the fight. A rubbish 4th set and a below par 2nd set. Soderling played a bad first...

yeah, fed was essentially a point away from a 4-peat at the AO, LOL. Fed was stopped by peakest safin, peakest Nadal and peak Djokovic (monoFed). Who was there to stop djokovic in his 5/7 WImbledons, LOL. Only one worthy of even remotely anywhere near above 3 is Nadal Wim 18 and even that was...

Both have 4 finals at Monte Carlo. Djokovic converted 2 because of facing weaker version of Nadal in 13 (compared to 06-08) and Berdych(15) as opposed to Wawrinka(14) Fed is also 2-0 vs Djokovic at Monte Carlo (excluding their 2006 match because djoko was young) Also Djokovic is 1-3 vs Fed at...

because delpo of RG 2009 > anyone djokovic faced at RG 2021 level wise. Fed also faced and beat Soderling, PHM, Monfils, Haas. Heck, Acusaso was bettter than Berretini of RG 21. LOL @ calling fed's RG 2009 competition as mugs and then bringing it Berretini . lololololololo The djoko fanboyism...

LOL, no. Fed's RG 09 run > Djoko's RG 2021 run, both level of competition wise and level wise. Only point in favour of Djoko impressiveness is the age. that's it. Djokovic didn't get the W vs Fed in 11 RG or vs Stan in 15 RG. Djoko went 5 sets vs delpo in Wim 13 when he was playing...