Recent content by AngryBirds

  1. A

    Federer is clearly more accomplished at ATP Tour Finals than Sampras and Nadal COMBINED

    Fed accumulated most of his titles against Roddick, Blake and Hewitt. Sampras regularly dominated guys who are great fast court players like Becker and Agassi. I'd say Sampras' 5 titles are more impressive.
  2. A

    Federer is clearly more accomplished at ATP Tour Finals than Sampras and Nadal COMBINED

    There's nothing to debate against Nadal at RG. He's the best, period. But Fed vs Sampras at WTF is still debatable. 6-5 is not like 3-10.
  3. A

    Federer is clearly more accomplished at ATP Tour Finals than Sampras and Nadal COMBINED

    Those guys actually won RG. Nadal didn't win anything at WTF. Zero 0.
  4. A

    Federer is clearly more accomplished at ATP Tour Finals than Sampras and Nadal COMBINED

    You can remove Nadal from the discussion. He is a complete non factor in this debate.
  5. A

    Which version of federer was better?

    2012 had faster movement and more explosive forehand. Still, both versions are not anywhere close to his peak.
  6. A

    What could Nadal do to match up better against Federer?

    A 17 year old body would suffice for Nadal. The kid was a physical freak.
  7. A

    What could Nadal do to match up better against Federer?

    He didn't have to play like he did in 2005-2008. Fed also has declined a lot. He just has to play at 80% of that, which should be enough to beat Grandperer.
  8. A

    What could Nadal do to match up better against Federer?

    Nadal needs to watch how his 2005-2008 version spanked peakest of peak Federer. He knew exactly what to do to beat Federer, but he didn't bring that kind of game.
  9. A

    Nadal withdraws from Basel

    It's always better to skip 500s and focus on 1000 events. I think Nadal is serious about the YE#1 ranking now.
  10. A

    federer and lendl/connors/sampras

    Noone is arguing that. This thread is about the records that Fed cannot match.
  11. A

    federer and lendl/connors/sampras

    Sampras won his US Open in his teens, 20s and 30s. Only Nadal at RG could match that.
  12. A

    Just how long until Federer's A game won't be good enough to win him big titles?

    Fed doesn't have A game anymore. He's playing at his B level at best, but it's more than good enough to dominate the current garbage field.
  13. A

    Article: The Secret Behind Federer’s Five-Match Win Streak Against Nadal

    Peak Fed would have bagelled and breadsticked all over current Nadal no joke.
  14. A

    Article: The Secret Behind Federer’s Five-Match Win Streak Against Nadal

    Nadal 2004-2005 would have beaten 36 years old Fed easily. Nadal is about 3 steps slower now and that makes all the difference.
Top